Why the USA should Outlaw Islam.

Vic Biorseth, Thursday, October 07, 2010
https://www.catholicamericanthinker.com

Why outlaw Islam? For the same reason we recommended Outlawing Marxism. There is and can be no middle ground between Marxism and the American Declaration of Independence and the American Constitution. There can be no compromise here. There is no room to negotiate. You cannot meet any Marxist notion, such as Equality Via Redistribution, part way and still support the Declaration and the Constitution. The same things can be said of Islam. Being forced to submit and convert, become a specially taxed slave, or be executed, is not compatible with the inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

America has always been a nation of free-wheeling free-thinkers. We have here legally established rights to freedom of speech, press, religion, assembly, petition, etc. That’s why some of our debates get pretty heated on occasion; over time we become more and more diverse in our thinking and life direction. This diversity of thought has good points and it has bad points, which can be argued well from either standpoint. However, when one ideology arises among the many that seeks and intends to replace all other ideologies and establish itself as the supreme ideology, destroying all opposition, we need to pause and study it. That thinking does not fit the American model, because it would in the future deny the very freedom that protects it today.

Do we want to remain the Constitutional nation as founded, or do we want to become something else? Question: Is our national foundation – the Declaration of Independence – and is our defining legal document – the Constitution – worthy of preserving intact, with all of our citizen rights, or is it time to replace it all with something else?

Now, everybody wants to tip-toe around any notion of outlawing Islam because of the religion clause in Amendment I of the Constitution. However, Islam is not merely a religion; it is a theocracy – a radical combination of Church and state. And, it is not merely a theocracy, but an aggressive, domineering and barbaric theocracy hell bent on forcing the entire world into submission to itself.

What this means is that Islam seeks not only to convert everyone to the religion of Islam, by any means necessary including force; but Islam also seeks to transform every other government and every other legal system into absolute submission to Islam. That necessarily means the end of not only our religion, but the end of our Declaration of Independence and the end of our Constitution, and the end of all of our legislated law. Are you really ready for that?

Islam’s Koran would make a system that is the reverse of all that we are and all that we stand for. Rather than a system of freedom that recognizes the rights of man, those of us who survive would become a conquering horde intent on forcing others into submission to Islam.

I submit that the main theme in the Koran aims at the destruction of America as founded, the negation of the American Declaration of Independence and the negation of the American Constitution and the Bill of Rights. It aims at the elimination of our religion, our ethos and our morality, and at turning us into enslavers and murderers. We talked about the nature of Islam in the The Last Barbarians Webpage.

We must outlaw the Koran just as soon as we have the legislative power to do it. We need legislation in defense of the whole of the American Ideal, including the Declaration and the Constitution. Islam is just flat out anti-American, and it seeks to destroy all that we have and all that we are. The language is just crystal clear. You can see a short-hand version of the more egregious verses in it in the Tolerating Brutal Intolerance Webpage; or, read the Koran itself. Islam doesn’t make any bones about what it intends to do to us.

Jews and Christians, as “people of the book,” are singled out for special treatment. Early verses seem especially peaceful toward us, but later verses are downright brutal. The reason is that Mohammed failed to win the Jews and the Christians over, and then had himself a little hissy-fit and wrote the later and harsher verses. He did that sort of thing a lot. Moslem theology insists that whatever verses he authored later automatically overrode and superseded any previous verses that they conflicted with. Therefore, the brutal verses are the ones that stand.

All good Moslems are to strike off our fingers and/or our heads, to make a wide slaughter among us, to enslave survivors, to torture us with fire and with boiling water, and to make continuous war against all unbelievers until no other religion exists except Islam. There can be no compromise here. This is held to be the irreformable word of Allah. No one is ever going to negotiate those verses out of the Koran.

No one who holds to Islam, in part or in whole, can honestly take and keep an oath of office involving the defense and safeguarding of the Constitution. These are opposite and antagonistic ideologies. Any elected or appointed official whose office is subject to such an oath should step down or be removed from office. No candidate for any such office who is identifiably Moslem should be held to be qualified for the office.

No member of the American armed forces who holds to Islam, in part or in whole, can honestly take and keep the oath of office for entry into the military, because Islam and the Constitution are opposites and antagonists. Any such member of the military should step down or be removed from uniform. No candidate for military service who is identifiably Moslem should be held to be qualified for service.

People should still be free to talk Islam all they want to; but we need to preclude Moslems from office and from military service, and we need to preclude any Islamic goals from American legislation.

No need to burn Korans as any part of outlawing the Koran, any more than there would be a need to burn the Communist Manifesto if we were to Outlaw Marxism. It is the principles and goals contained in the document that are to be outlawed. Libraries and private citizens should be free to keep the Koran so that people can see what it is. What, then, should be outlawed, besides Moslems holding office or entering the military? What restrictions should there be?

• No building of any new mosques.
• No repairing or expanding any existing mosques.
• No praying in public in the Moslem manner.
• No audible Islamic call to prayer.
• No immigration of Moslems.
• No travel, work or student visas granted to Moslems.
• All Moslems to register as Moslems.
• All Moslem convicts to be deported after serving any prison sentence.

Islam is just as treacherous, underhanded, sneaky and deceptive as is Marxism in seeking to destroy nations from within. Islam slowly builds little enclaves into larger ones, ultimately claiming a territory that it considers to be under Sharia law, and then its attitude changes and becomes more belligerent to the host country. Islam, like Marxism, is a cancer on society. It declared war on the whole of the non-Islamic world over 1,300 years ago, and it’s taken this long for the non-Islamic world to begin to recognize that simple fact. It needs to be outlawed in America.

That’s my argument; what’s yours?

=====

Sarcastic Acronym Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" it over a link without clicking just to see the simple acronym interpretation. Click any footnote link to see the acronym and a detailed explanation; "Hover" the mouse over it just to see the simple interpretation.)

SLIMC¹ Secularist Liberal Intellectual Media Complex
GESGOEAEOT² Gradually, Ever So Gradually, Over Eons And Eons Of Time
PEWAG³ Punctuated Equilibrium's Wild-Assed Guess
TTRSTF⁴ Them There Real Scientifical-Type Fellers
TTRSPTF⁵ Them There Real Smart Perfesser-Type Fellers
TTRSJTF⁶ Them There Real Smart Journalistical-Type Fellers
SNRTACBT⁷ Surely No Right Thinking Adult Could Believe Today
STNSEACPB⁸ Surely Today No Serious Educated Adult Could Possibly Believe
WDN⁹ We Don't Know
BMDFP¹⁰ Baboons, Mongrel Dogs, Filthy Pigs and ...
HBAACOTE¹¹ Human Beings Are A Cancer On The Earth
ACLU¹² Anti-Christian Litigation Union
FLORMPORIF¹³ Flagrant Liar, Or, Mindless Parrot, Or, Innocent Fool
MEJTML¹⁴ Marxist Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar
IEJTML¹⁵ Islamic Ends-Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar
MPAV¹⁶ Marxist Principles And Values
WBESSWG¹⁷ Wise, Benign, Elite, Super-Scientific World Governance
TRMITM¹⁸ The Reason Man's In This Mess
IYI¹⁹ Intellectual Yet Idiotic
TTRSCBTF²⁰ Them There Real Smart Catholic Bishop Type Fellers
IACMPVND²¹ Illegal-Alien-Criminal Marxocrat-Party-Voting Nation-Destroyers
PEJTML²² Palestinian Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar
PSYOP²³ "Psychological Operation" Mind Trick
CDC²⁴ Covid Developmentally Challenged
LGBTQ+ Every Letter Represents A Serious Psychotic sexual Identity Disorder
HEJTML²⁶ Hedonist Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar
SEJTML²⁷ Scientistic Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar

Reference Material

[All Web Pages listed in Site Map by date-of-publication;
oldest at the top, newest at the bottom of the list.]

Culture=Religion+Politics;  Who Are We?  Vic Biorseth

The Brilliantly Conceived Organization of the USA;  Vic Biorseth

Live Interviews

Return to the BLOG page

Return to the HOME PAGE

Subscribe to our Free E-Zine News Letter

---

Date: Sun Oct 10 10:31:46 2010
From: Mahmoud
Email:
Location: NY NY
Comment:

Victor, this is crazy, intolerant and illegal in America. The constitution forbids it as violation of freedom of religion. You cannot “outlaw” a religion in America. Not all Muslims are terrorists; you need to differentiate between good and bad in any religion. Your religion has bad people also, and you cannot outlaw your religion.

---

Date: Sun Oct 10 12:43:17 2010
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

Mahmoud:

I do not seek to outlaw a religion; what I seek to outlaw is a belligerent and invasive theocracy that is committed to world conquest and religious domination.

US Constitution, Amendment I:

In simple English, this is a legal prohibition on the government, saying that the government may not impose any particular theology on anyone. Every state in America has an Amendment similar to this on in its State Constitution. It is the law of that land, at the federal level and at the state level. (I have always interpreted it to mean further that the government may not impose the theology of atheism on anyone.)

What Islam proposes to do is impose its theology on America, impose Islamic government over American government, and impose Islamic law over all law in America. In plain English, Islam intends to do exactly what it is specifically prohibited by law from doing by Amendment I, and a whole lot more besides.

The Koran clearly directs all Moslems to make war against us until no other religion exists except Islam (2:139; 8:39; 9:29). Are you prepared to stand there in public with your bare face hanging out and tell me either that that order from Mohammed to make continuous war is not in the Koran, or that the words in the Koran are not held by Moslems to be the incorruptible and irreformable words of Allah?

Do you really think we’re that stupid?

Regards,

Vic

---

Date: Wed Dec 22 11:22:07 2010
From: justin
Email:
Location: USA
Comment:

I respect you. All Moslems should be executed brutally by the USA government.

---

Date: Wed Dec 22 18:55:24 2010
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

Justin:

That is what a Marxist government might do, and that is what a Moslem government might do. But we are not Marxists, and we are not Moslems. We are Americans, and as Americans we are called to a higher dignity.

Regards,

Vic

---

Date: Mon Oct 03 06:48:18 2011
From: PeteWaldo
Email:

christian 2 muslims@yahoo.com
Location:
Comment:

You seem to be in direct opposition the Roman Catholic church. The Pope and Vatican Council on Islam:

---

Date: Tue Oct 04 05:44:2011 2011
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

PeteWaldo: Right.

I believe I may have quoted those very words somewhere, but I don’t remember where. What they describe are the beliefs and behaviors of the vast majority of Moslems who have not yet really gotten into their own faith sufficiently to have encountered the Islamic call to war, conquest, subjugation and murder – see the Refuting Mohammed page. They also refer to the public words, spoken to non-Moslems by many recognized leaders and spokesmen of Islam. But they do not reflect the more private words of those same men spoken to other Moslems strictly within the house of Islam.

The leadership of Islam thinks we are too stupid to figure out what they intend to do to us, and they appear to be largely correct. “We come in peace” is what they say in English to Western man. But the message is reversed when spoken in Arabic to followers in the Mosques and elsewhere in the house of Islam. If Islam were open, honest and decent, as we understand that word, it would look us in the eye and tell us of its true intentions toward us; but that is not the case. Islam is treacherous and deceitful, just like Marxism. The peaceful Moslem leader holds a sword behind his back.

Ranking clerics, holders of high office, political candidates and all recognized “leaders” in the West seem to feel the need to tip-toe around the issue and speak kindly to and of Islam, to be overly respectful and super-sensitive to the “feelings” of Moslems, and to avoid, with great effort, even discussing the violent history, the violent scripture and the quite consistent violent preaching of Islam. In fact, some of them will publicly deny it.

But I am no cleric, I am no office holder and I am no politician; I treat the issue straight up, directly and openly. It’s right there in front of you in black and white. History is still available to the researcher, despite the efforts of those who would erase it or re-write it. The Koran and the Haddith are available for your perusal.

Islam intends to rule all, in religion and in civil law, pure and simple.

Regards,

Vic

---

Date: Thu Oct 20 07:43:36 2011
From: PeteWaldo
Email:
Location:
Comment:

Dear Vic,

Thanks so much for the kind favor of your reply. You wrote: "What they describe are the beliefs and behaviors of the vast majority of Moslems....

They also refer to the public words, spoken to non-Moslems by many recognized leaders and spokesmen of Islam."

The Vatican Council is not ignorant to what the Quran and Hadith actually say. Nor did they simply parrot Islam's ignorant minions, or taqiyyah practitioners, but instead went so tragically far beyond that.

Read it again.

Now you and I know that couldn't be more UNTRUE, since Muhammad, and thus all of his followers, profess the EXACT OPPOSITE of the WHOLE SUBJECT of the Gospel.

Indeed the most egregious - and only unpardonable - sin in Muhammad's cult is committed when a Muslim confesses that Jesus is the Son of God.

That's 1.5 billion antichrists in the world today - just in Islam - not even counting atheists and other antichrists! The reward?

The Pope and Vatican council didn't say "Muslims BELIEVE they worship the one true God..." or "Muslims BELIEVE they submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees..."

So what they wrote couldn't be more UNTRUE, of which I thought exposing UNTRUTH is the purpose of your site.

What if instead of the cowardly declarations above - and the pope literally kissing the antichrist Quran and even praying in a mosque that points to the Quraish pagan's black stone idol in Mecca, in an act of reconciliation to apologize for the TRUTH that was spoken by one of their own clergy - what if they had offered a genuine Christian response instead?

What if the pope and Vatican council had stood up for Jesus instead, and declared Islam to profess the EXACT OPPOSITE of the WHOLE SUBJECT of the Gospel, so all those deluded people that you suggested that call themselves Muslims but remain in abject ignorance to their own religion, could have had perhaps their first opportunity to be shown the truth?

The Pope was in the enviable position of being in the bully pulpit, with the perfect opportunity to begin a massive global dialogue, not unlike when Ronald Reagan went against all of the appeasing liberals and media elite and TOLD THE TRUTH, that the Soviet Union was indeed an EVIL EMPIRE.

If the Pope had done the same, how many Muslims do you think might have gotten that first spark of cognitive dissonance, and the first step to a new heart?

It need not be complicated. It could have been done very easily through the single Quran verse that REJECTS the WHOLE SUBJECT of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Your brother in Christ Jesus,

Pete

(if you could put a couple spaces and maybe 2 lines in my email address in the prior post, I would appreciate it, so internet spiders and bots can't catalog it. Thanks a lot bro.

---

Date: Fri Oct 21 05:50:30 2011
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

PeteWaldo:

You are quite correct in what you say. I have disagreed with the Pope before, as shown in The Pope On Globalism page in this site. Let me make three points regarding “the Pope and the Vatican”:

1. The Pope is human and is as free as the rest of us to err on matters outside the Deposit of Faith laid down by our Lord and His Apostles. He is kept from error only when speaking on matters of faith and morals.
2. The false religion of Islam was not invented until multiple centuries after the death of the last Apostle. The Pope may be ignorant of the true nature of Islam, or, more likely, he may fear for the peace of the world. Or some combination of the two.
3. The Pope is in a delicate position of being a peaceful global diplomat facing a blood-thirsty menace that cannot take being hit in the face with the Truth without reacting with violence.

Regarding the Evil Empire of the Soviet Union, John Paul the Great did indeed do the same. He went into the belly of the beast, preaching the Gospel on Communist ground while it was still Communist. It was John Paul the Great just as much as it was Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher who brought down the Soviet Union.

That being said, I still agree with you. The Pope should make a brief, clear and simple statement regarding the true nature of Islam.

Regards,

Vic

---

Date: Thu Dec 15 21:40:11 2011
From: Dwayne M.
Email:
Location: Rochester NY
Comment:

The Conservative’s Forum says that Islam is not a religion at all, and that you are mistaken saying Islam is a religion. You should go there and participate.

---

Date: Fri Dec 16 06:43:21 2011
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

Dwayne:

I don’t have a whole lot of free time these days, and what little I have is spent right here keeping up with this website. I think at this point, all these centuries after Mohammed, with upwards of a billion practitioners in the world, it is rather foolish to not recognize Islam as a religion. It may be a false religion, but it is nevertheless a recognized world religion, with hordes of convinced followers.

The important thing about Islam is that it is not merely a religion; it is also a theocracy, which is to say, a radical combination of Church and state. And it is not merely a theocracy, but an aggressive expansionist theocracy that seeks to impose itself on all others, by force if necessary. The whole mission of Islam is to grow itself at the expense of the non-Islamic world.

Regards,

Vic

---

Date: Thu Aug 09 05:23:10 2012
From: Link Travella
Email: linktravella@hotmail.com
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Comment:

The right to freedom of religion in the US Constitution was put there UNDER THE ASSUMPTION that all religions were BENIGN. "Islam" is NOT "benign"; it promotes "SHARIA LAW", and the MURDER OF and LYING TO "infidels". Very simply, our "rights" DO NOT SUPERCEDE US LAW, or PUBLIC SAFETY; you can't promote "Sharia Law" and the MURDER of "infidels" and hide behind freedom of religion anymore than you can yell "fire!" in a crowded theatre and hide behind freedom of speech. Therefore, "Islam" does NOT fall under the Constitutional protection of "religion". ALL Muslims in the United States should be given the choice between SELF or FORCED DEPORTATION to a Muslim country, or PROSECUTION under EXISTING "RICO" STATUTES. Muslims should not be allowed to immigrate into the US. "Mosques" should be shut down and CONFISCATED the same as the property of DRUG DEALERS and other CRIMINALS. Unfortunately, this isn't going to happen; the "Islamization" of the US IS WELL UNDERWAY. Barry Soetoro (aka "Barrack Obamma") IS A MUSLIM who is LYING (according to the Koran). May the God of Israel have mercy on us. Jesus IS GOD; "Allah" is a fiction.

---

Date: Thu Aug 09 05:44:26 2012
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

Link:

Actually, as we said in the Refuting Separation of Church and State page, freedom of religion was put into the Constitution to keep Congress from establishing any official national religion, and to not allow Congress to prevent any of the thirteen Colonies from freely worshiping in accordance with the Christian denominations already pre-established as official legal state religions in each Colony, and to allow any citizen to worship or “exercise” in any Christian denomination, in any Colony.

It said (and says) nothing about any “religion” that is also another form of government and another form of law that would superimpose itself over us and over our Constitution. I no longer waste time and effort arguing about Sharia Law, or variants of it, or anything else that is extra-Koranic. It is enough for me that the Koran itself expressly calls for us all to be converted to Islam, subjugated to Islamic law, or killed. That’s what the Koran tells its readers to do to us.

Therefore, I find no disagreement with what you say, as ugly as it appears on its face. We cannot have any new law superimposed over our Constitution, which is intended to be the supreme law of the land. Islam itself is absolutely intolerant of the other. Our own toleration of Islam among us might be suicidal. It might be a bit easier to tolerate Islam over there somewhere, far away from our shores.

Regards,

Vic

---

Date: Fri Aug 17 10:33:05 2012
From: Robert D.
Email: dosvsoperator@yahoo.com
Location: St. Louis/MO/United States
Comment:

Bottom line: if Islam can be banned, so can Christianity and Judaism. Both of these have sworn enemies in this country and indeed in the West - to say nothing of the rest of the world. Do we really want to go there?

---

Date: Fri Aug 17 19:16:31 2012
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

Robert:

Not true.

Neither Christianity nor Judaism seeks to overthrow or replace the supreme law of our land, or of any other land. Only Islam seeks to dominate us, and the world. That is Islam’s whole purpose for being.

See the Refuting Mohammed page.

Regards,

Vic

---

Date: Sun Aug 19 13:15:09 2012
From: You people are insane
Email:
Location:
Comment:

America will not be overrun with Islam. If you haven't noticed, we have already been under the control of major religion- CHRISTIANITY. Christian ideals have found their way into politics to such an extent that many of our now "major issues" have Christian ties; abortion, same-sex marriage, etc. How do you look passed these hypocrisies? When will we finally move passed these insignificant issues provoked by the religious right? When will we solve real problems and move towards a brighter, more free future?

---

Date: Mon Aug 20 05:55:24 2012
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

You People …

You haven’t been paying attention. Over-running the world is the ultimate goal of Islam, by use of force. There is a world of difference between the methods of Christian evangelization and Moslem conquest.

Maybe you didn’t notice, but America started out a Christian nation and remains a Christian nation. It is our common Judeo-Christian Ethos that makes of us a “good people” as Tocqueville described us, and it is that ethos that provides our common moral code, from which we develop our representative civil law.

If our Judeo-Christian morality affects such issues as abortion, same sex marriage, etc., that is not hypocrisy; that is as it should be. It is not Christianity, but religions such as atheism and Islam that seeks to impose its will against the Christian majority.

I know how much you despise Jesus Christ, Christianity and Christians in general, but if you want to live among us you’re just going to have to get over it, and deal with us on our terms, not yours. I know how much you love abortion, same sex marriage, etc., but federal law has no constitutional business addressing such issues, regardless of how badly you wish to impose your immoral will on all the rest of us through civil law. Here, states and local jurisdictions make their own laws in accordance with community standards. If you don’t like it where you live, you can move.

If you truly believe that abortion, same sex marriage, etc., are the marks of a brighter, more free future, then your ultimate destination is hell. You may enjoy the journey, but not the destination.

Regards,

Vic

---

Note:

Thursday, September 27, 2012

As part of the ongoing effort to upgrade this whole website, upgraded this webpage to the new BB 2.0 - SBI! 3.0 release and to make use of the new reusable code features.
An earlier phase of this major conversion corrupted or adversely affected some fonts, alignments, quotes and tables in the previously published webpages. Not to worry; this phase is converting them all, one by one. Eventually, every webpage on this site will have the same look and feel as this one.
LOVE this new release!

Regards,

Vic

---

Date: Thu Sep 27 06:58:01 2012
From: Patriot1
Email:
Location:
Comment:

Vic,

In the right column of this very page you have a link called “Refuting Mohammed and his ideology of conquest masquerading as a religion” and you further describe Mohammed as “ … little more than a popular fraud among pagans.”

And yet here you call it a religion.

Why?

---

Date: Thu Sep 27 07:12:43 2012
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

Patriot1:

I do not consider Islam to be a proper religion, or a valid religion, or anything other than a fraud. However, with over a billion followers, the vast majority of whom actually think they are following a religion, and probably a majority of the non-Islamic world who also (mistakenly) think Islam is a real religion, it is just pointless to debate the point in almost any public arena. No matter what political, theatrical or other kind of podium you could speak from, you will be ignored or written off as a nut case if you try to convince the world of the invalidity of Islam as a religion.

So what I try to do is emphasize the theocratic nature of it, and emphasize that Islam is a form of government, antagonistic to every other form of government. Islam is a legal system, antagonistic to every other form of legal system. Islam seeks to impose itself on the entire world, by force, and that is what needs to be recognized.

I guess I just hit a point where it seems a complete waste of effort to try to convince the world that Islam is not a real religion. But the threat must be recognized and dealt with.

The non-Islamic world needs to pay attention to what Islam intends to do to them, regardless of their religion or lack of religion. Islam has morphed into an ideology with a plan. Like Marxism, the real Islamic plan is universal.

Regards,

Vic

---

Date:  Sun May 19 11:58:43 2013
From:  i<3muslims
Email:   
Location:  
Comment: 

i read this article and felt sick, this is disgusting. every religion and human is equal, stop labelling and start loving. God did not said 'love your neighbor as yourself' which is what i shall do, rather that spreading racist hate.

---

Date:  Mon May 20 06:16:03 2013
From:  Vic Biorseth
Comment:  

i<3muslims:

If you really believe that all religions and all humans are equal then you are a fool.  I know how much you despise Caucasians, but that doesn't make Caucasians racist; rather, it makes you a racist.  If you want to go spread Christian love throughout the world, start out in Egypt, where most Christians are fleeing for their lives.  Go show the Moslems your Christian love and see how they respond.  I'll wait here.  Let me know how that turns out for you. 

Regards,

Vic

---

Date:  Thu May 30 06:22:11 2013
From:  Stan
Email:   
Location:  
Comment: 

Apparently Thomas Jefferson liked Islam since he wrote an English version of the Qu'ran.  If he were to apply for citizenship today, let alone run for President, would you support him?

---

Date:  Thu May 30 09:07:24 2013
From:  Vic Biorseth
Comment:  

Stan:

You have it backwards, my friend.  Jefferson feared and despised Islam; that's why he had the Koran published in English; it was to be a warning to all who spoke English. 

Here's what I said about it in The Way, The Truth and The Life:

Go back and study America's very first war after gaining independence.  You might be surprised. 

Regards,

Vic

---

Date:  Tue Dec 10 18:18:15 2013
From:  Captain
Email:   camptaisdnd@aol.com
Location:  New York
Comment: 

Can I bring back an ancient religion like that practiced by the Aztecs which includes Human Sacrifice? And practice it in the US?

It's My religion and I can practice it legally in America!

But let's talk about ISLAM...

It's a sick cult of uneducated, lobotomized idiots...who KILL those who don't follow their cult!

"Behead Those Who Insult The Prophet" signs have been carried by Muslims.
When was the last time you saw ANY OTHER RELIGION carry such signs threatening:

Decapitation for not following their One True Belief System?
Christians? Jews? Buddhists? Taosists? Atheists? Agnostics? Scientologists? UFO Cults?

NOT ONE!

---

Date:  Wed Dec 11 05:34:11 2013
From:  Vic Biorseth
Comment:  

Captain:

Amen.

(To see what the Captain is talking about, see the Democracy V. Open-Society page.) 

Regards,

Vic

---

Date:   Wed Aug 13 2014
From:  Vic Biorseth
Comment:  

Changes pursuant to changing the website URL and name from 
Thinking Catholic Strategic Center to
Catholic American Thinker.

Pulled the trigger on the 301 MOVE IT option June 1, 2014. Working my way through all the webpages.  . 

Regards,

Vic

---

Date:  Wed Aug 13 06:31:14 2014
From:  Bokul
Email:   
Location:  
Comment: 

You said no Muslim may take oath for office or military because Muslims oppose your constitution.  You are wrong.  Holy Qur'an nowhere says that.  Show me where in Holy Qur'an or retract. 

---

Date:  Wed Aug 13 2014
From:  Vic Biorseth
Comment: 

Bokul: 

Sura 9.29 in the Koran orders all Moslems to:

What this means is that Moslems are instructed to:

1. Convert all infidels to Islam, or,
   
2. Subjugate all unconverted infidels under strict Islamic law and subject them to a special tax, or,
   
3. Kill them. 
   

All of that violates the Constitution that all American high federal office holders and all American military members are sworn to uphold and defend against all enemies, foreign or domestic. 

There is also this, in the Koran:

What is meant by "guard yourselves" and "precautions" is explained in the Commentary on the Koran thus:

This is but one of many Koranic instructions to Moslems to lie, so long as they lie to infidels.  The Koran is absolutely antagonistic and opposed to the whole of the American Constitution, as is Marx's Communist Manifesto.  Both oppose and seek to destroy all other religions/ideologies/legal systems/governments other than themselves.  Globally. 

Regards,

Vic

---

Date:  Fri May 29 22:32:07 2015
From:  jjjake
Email:   jjjake@msn.com
Location:  ny
Comment: 

1.No extraordinary natural signs before birth of Muhammad, or predictions from past religious characters about arrival of Muhammad to save the world.
2.Islam did not exist at the time Muhammad was born. He was born to an idolater family and that’s what he followed all his childhood and teenage. That means, Muhammad, born as a Qafir (Infidel), spent 70% of his life as a proud infidel before he invented Islam.
3.His first marriage was with a Jewish woman and not with any Muslimah. So, which religious rites were followed at his marriage ceremony with a Jewish woman if Islam wasn’t yet born? Certainly, a Jewish style marriage ceremony! Even the Quran doesn’t mention anything about the Islamic ceremony of Prophet Muhammad’s first marriage. That simply shows that even Muhammad didn’t have any idea of the existence of Islam or his prophecy.
4.If Muhammad was an adorable prophet sent by Allah, then why didn't he reveal the truth about Islam, when he was a child or when he got young? Why did he waste 40 years of his life as a non-Muslim idolater? If his purpose of coming in this world was only to reveal Islam and preach it to people, then why he had to wait until more than half of his life, living like a common man and practicing idol-worship?
5.Almost all the rituals and rules of Islam mentioned in the Quran are copied from Judaism, which shows how deeply Muhammad was inspired by Judaism and attracted towards the Torah. So, he found copying and pasting from the Torah into his Quran was the easiest way to invent a new religion.
6.Muhammad spread Islam on the point of the sword and not with love and preaching. His strategy was to rule at any price.
7.Muhammad killed poor, innocent and helpless people, which can’t be justified in any sense as act of a holy prophet.
8.How to call Muhammad a holy prophet, when he sexually abused uncountable number of women, including sometimes ridiculously shamefully, like his marriage with minor Aisha and his own daughter-in-law Zainab. That proves that Muhammad was just another powerful dictator, who knew very well how to take advantage of his power and abuse everyone, anywhere and in any way.
9.Muhammad never performed any miracle, which is expected of a prophet. Instead of helping the suffering people, he used to destroy well-settled, peaceful communities, capturing their lands and making the captured children and women slave.
10.In his life, Muhammad did immense harm to humanity but that was not enough for his satanic mind. So, before dying, he left the messages of Jihad to his followers for conquering the whole world, all of humanity, in the name of Islam, which continues causing great sufferings to our lives to this day. Wouldn't a true prophet sacrifice his own life for his people, instead of destroying lives on every flimsy excuses? It shows that Muhammad was not a prophet – neither in life nor in death.

It is hard to find a holy personality in other religions, who committed atrocious crimes like those of Muhammad. Let’s have a look at some other famous religious characters from history:

Jesus Christ: He didn’t initiate any war, never killed innocent people, and didn’t abuse women like Muhammad. He has not left any question mark on his character before leaving this world.

Budha: A man who left his home, luxury life and all the advantages he could have because of his rich background, just because he was really looking for truth and peace and make them reach to the humanity, which he did without putting sword on anyone’s neck. That’s like a truly holy personality.

Ram: Even in Hinduism, Rama, the god of the idol-worshipping Hindus was a much better example than Muhammad, who spent many years of his life in jungles, leaving behind his entire luxurious kingdom. He engaged in some war, but on valid excuses. He never killed or tortured poor people on flimsy excuses as did Muhammad. He never forced someone to embrace Hinduism.

I am not justifying that any of the religions mentioned above is true, but all I want to say is that in comparison to Muhammad, those religious personalities stand higher in esteem and cleaner in character.

On the other hand, evil Muhammad did all kinds of things what civilized humanity and laws deem as criminal and barbaric. Wouldn’t you now say that Muhammad was a bloody prophet? Oh, come on! Come out of the illusion, accept the reality and be practical. A man, who cunningly declared himself a prophet, fooled the world by copying and pasting from the Torah to create his own holy book, the “Quran”, can’t be a prophet. A man, who never gave life to someone but snatched lives of innocent people, can’t be holy, can he? A man, who before leaving this world, has left so much pain, turbulence and destruction, can not be a God-sent prophet, can he?

Muhammad by his own actions has left a giant “question mark” on his character because of which he will never ever be accepted as a holy prophet by sane, educated, people, brave enough to call dirty what is dirty.

Muhammad: you are on curse of many widows, orphan children and helpless parents who got their loving children becoming victims of your cunning desires. Shame on you the blood-thirsty self-claimed prophet of no God.

---

Date:  Sat May 30 2015
From:  Vic Biorseth
Comment:  

Jjjake:

Amen.

Regards,

Vic

---

Date:  Sat Nov 14 06:39:02 2015
From:  Indonesian Christian
Email:   
Location:  
Comment: 

To this webmaster: I'm a Christian (Protestant) in Indonesia, an Islamic majority country. Yes, i believe Islam is different than Christianity (i disregard "denomination" here) to the point Allah and our God is not the same. Yes, many of the most brutal Christian persecution in the world were committed by muslims (incl. in my country)

Any tips for your brothers and sisters in faith who lives in there? I'm not yet have an opportunity and money to go to America, sir. so I never experience your country first-hand.

I personally don't think a muslim student need to be barred to study (particularly with scholarship) or work in your country (like in the Silicon Valley) simply because he or she's muslim, in this case he or she are competent. (human rights speaks here)

Any other explanation, sir?

Jesus Bless this ministry (even I'm not a Catholic)

---

Date:  Sat Nov 14 2015
From:  Vic Biorseth
Comment:  

Indonesian Christian:

I don't know what to say to fellow Christians living in predominantly Moslem lands, other than, find some way to get out of there.  Sooner or later Islam will kill or subjugate all non-Moslems. 

In America, at the moment, no one is barred from legal immigration, any kind of visa including student visa, or even illegal entry, or even invasion.  That's the problem.  We are allowing, even welcoming, our own future murderers and enslavers into our country. 

No free non-Islamic people should ever allow any Moslem to enter their country.  No free non-Islamic nation should allow any Moslems to remain free inside their borders.  That's just simple common sense, and responsible adult judgment. 

What's going on in France at this moment is typical of what happens when the doors are opened and Islam is allowed in.  That's what the Koran instructs disciples to do to non-Moslems.  That's normal Islam, in practice. 

If you think the Moslem student next door poses no threat, you haven't read the Koran.  Perhaps neither has he.  If he has read it, and he doesn't agree with what it explicitly instructs him to do to you, then, why is he still a Moslem? 

Regards,

Vic

---

Date:  Tue Dec 20 16:39:46 2016
From:  Theocratic Christian
Email:   theocrat2@hotmail
Location:  Lakewood, Ohio, America
Comment: 

Banning Islam can be done by either understanding religion in the American Constitution to mean Christianity, or by amending the Constitution, considering John 10, Leviticus 26, and other scriptures.

Thanks for speaking out.

---

Date:  Wed Dec 21 2016
From:  Vic Biorseth
Comment:  

Theocratic:

There is no need to "understand" the USA as being a theocracy, nor is there any need to amend the Constitution just to outlaw any existing menace to American national security.  The First Amendment was not intended to be any kind of a national suicide pact. 

Freedom of Speech does not grant the right to work for the elimination of Freedom of Speech. 

Freedom of Religion does not grant the right to work for the elimination of Freedom of Religion. 

Marxism and Islam, both, exist to oppose and eliminate our very purpose for being, which is, to protect citizen rights to Equality, Life, Liberty and Property.  These are not merely declared to be our national purpose, in our Declaration, but they are actual, coded-in Constitutional rights of American citizens.  These rights may not be denied any citizen without due process of law. 

Both Marxism and Islam oppose every one of them.  That makes them absolute, unrelenting, irreformable mortal enemies of the USA. 

Any President can and should outlaw Islam as a threat to American national security.  Protecting national security is his bound duty. 

All that's required here is simple common sense. 

The Authors of the Constitution never intended to "free" ideological movements or religions that intend to destroy or forcibly control all human civilization. 

Regards,

Vic

---

Date:  Tue Feb 21 22:28:31 2017
From:  loops
Email:   loop@mail.com
Location:  
Comment: 

Outlaw Islam.

It is not a theology / religion only.

It is a political system.

Communism, Marxism, Nazism, just like Islam, are political ideologies. It should be illegal.

Muslims should be deported back to the middle east. All of them.
Buddhists should be sent back to China/Tibet. Hindus back to India.

Everyone should be separated. You might think this is a bad idea. Should criminals be separated from the common citizen?

Technically whites should go back to Europe, but, out of all other ideologies, who better than whites to protect natives?

---

Date:  Wed Feb 22 2017
From:  Vic Biorseth
Comment:  

Loops:

So far as I know, Hindus and Buddhists pose no threats to anyone in the USA, and no religion or ideology that does not conflict with the Pledge of Allegiance, or with the Constitution and the Declaration should not be welcome here.  Anyone of any faith or belief system who can embrace and live in accordance with American law is a potentially good, productive and valuable American Citizen.  Just as likely to live within the law or commit some crime as anyone else. 

Only Marxism and Islam do not fit that description.  Both seek to destabilize and displace whatever is, and replace it with something else.  Both are forms of Global Revolution, in their very foundation and in their very purpose for being. 

That makes them enemies of America and enemies of Civilization. 

Very simple; nothing to it. 

Regards,

Vic

---

Date:  Tue Dec 19 21:42:53 2023
From:  Mitch
Email:   
Location:  
Comment: 

Sadly Christian Arabs & "Palestinians" as well  as Atheist Arabs have been vile Jew-Haters and Supporters of Terrorism  Not All Hatreds are Equal, Anti-Semitism, Jew-Hatred is Worse than All Other Hateds combined

---

This Form cannot be submitted until the missing fields (labelled below in red) have been filled in

ADD COMMENT

Please note that all fields followed by an asterisk must be filled in.

Name / Pseudo-Name:*

E-mail Address:

City / State / Country:

Comment:*

Please enter the word that you see below.

Copyrighted Material