Consequences of Breaking the System and Restoring the Constitution.

Assessing the good, bad and ugly consequences of breaking the system of political corruption and returning America to Constitutional Rule.

Vic Biorseth, Tuesday, September 13, 2016
https://www.catholicamericanthinker.com/

"You break it, you bought it!" says the stern look on the face of the shopkeeper as you handle his costly but fragile items for sale.  Which is only right, after all, because it's his business.  Most Americans may be blithely unaware of the fact that our nation's actual earliest motto was "Mind Your Business."  And that didn't mean, solely, to keep your nose out of other people's business.  It meant to mind yours. 

To be constantly attentive, prudent and frugal in your affairs.  Maybe you don't consider yourself to be "in business", but if you are an American, you are supposed to be in your own business.  That doesn't mean you've started some kind of company.  It means that every household has a budget, some income, some needs, some contributors, and some necessary costs.  That is your business, and every member of the household has a personal interest in that business, and every household has a head-of-household.  Even if you're a loner, you had better pay close attention to your budget.  That's your business. 

In early America, you were on your own.  You made your own way.  And that was the "draw".  It was the irresistible attraction that drew new citizens from all over Europe, because everywhere else, your business was the State's business, and everyone served a crowned head or a noble, first, before tending his own business.  And what was his was not necessarily what was his.  His business was the State's business, first. 

Only being self-dependent and self-reliant translates into true Liberty. 

That was the state of affairs in America before she allowed Political Parties to come into being, and her Political Parties wrested political and legal control of the nation away from the Constitution.  The whole unconstitutional process is described among the Political Parties Pages. 

The original Parties were born of factions that coalesced into formal, organized Parties over the Slavery issue.  The problem is, after the Civil War when the question was settled, the Parties did not disband and disappear, since they no longer had any purpose for being.  Both the losing and the winning Party grew, and "evolved" different agendas and political aims. 

And the chief aim, for both Parties, became the usurpation of raw Political Power from each other, from the Constitution and from the People.  To give Government a new purpose:  To Rule.  Politics became a lucrative profession, and building the power of the Party became a near obsession, on both sides.  Until today, when almost everything the American government does is outside the Constitutional rules of operation for the American government. 

Parties are not supposed to run the Government; Government is not supposed to rule.  The Constitution is supposed to rule, and the government is supposed to be subject to it, as are the people.  That's why elected officers of the government swear an oath of allegiance to the Constitution before assuming office.  Even the President is supposed to stand equal to the lowest citizen before the Supreme Law of the Land, which is the Constitution. 

What's supposed to be and what is are now two entirely different things. 

What we have now is a "system" that is universally accepted as "the way things work" in America.  It's how stuff gets done, and it is now, rightly or wrongly, considered to be the norm; the "American Way". 

That is the system that needs to be broken, and it will not be broken without resistance from all quarters, and it will not be broken without very serious consequences, both good and bad.  Hopefully the good will outweigh the bad, but none of this "breakage" is going to come without cost, nor will it all come without the strong possibility even of major bloodshed.  Feelings are that strong.  The "Party System" is solidly established; the Constitution is very nearly forgotten. 

The question is this:  Is America ever to return to being a Constitutional Republic, as designed, or not?  That is a yes or no question.  Marxist, Islamic and all other Globalist Ideologies say no.  American Constitutional Ideology says yes.  For those non-ideologues, who never thought about it, or who never developed any political ideology, Simple Common Sense says that we, and the whole world, would be better off if America were operating under the American Constitution as ratified than under any other system ever tried.  But we will never get there without breaking the Party System and everything related to it, and outlawing Political Parties. 

So, we need to take a deep breath and consider the consequences of all of the required, "Breakings", one a a time, and each of us needs to make a decision about it. 

---

Breaking the Parties:  What happens when we take the Political Parties out of governmental existence, and break the "Crony" relationship between the Party-Donor Ruling Class and the Political Parties themselves, and the actual running of the American government? 

The Good: 

1. American government will be closer to the original designed-in national intent of Constitutional Rule, and further away from Rule Of Men.  The Parties may still exist, but only as private enterprises, divorced from any official government authority. 
   
2. Politicians and candidates for office would run on how they would support, oppose or interpret Constitutional points of law.  Congressional Committees would be comprised of best-men-for-the-job, not by Party politics.  Rules operation of both houses would change for the better. 
   
3. The Congress and the States will go back to putting forward candidates for high office, and the Electoral College would elect the President solely from among those candidates. 
   
4. No more Party Primaries, Party Conventions or Party Delegates. 
   

The Bad: 

1. The Parties and their big-money owners will continually work to undermine and control the government.  They will not stand still for this. 
   
2. Within the government, many of those office holders who are not impeached from office will remain Party operatives underground.  They will still take their orders from their donor-owners and still seek to wrest control from the Constitution.  Cronyism will still exist, but it will be more hidden, and potentially even more treacherous. 
   

The Ugly: 

1. The convinced, Useful-Idiot Moron Vote voter-base of the Marxocrat Party will go nuts.  Many will join the really wild revolutionary-anarchist branches of Leftism, such as Occupy Wall Street, Black Lives Matter, etc. 
   
2. The Karl Rove - James Carville type "Consultant Class" Party operatives who make millions on political contests, win lose or draw, will redirect their efforts; some of them to aid revolutionary-anarchist movements, some of them to aid subversive ops in government, paid by owner-donors. 
   
3. Party Owner-Donors will seek other avenues for their big money efforts at achieving Crony Political Power.  Some of that will be revolutionary-anarchistic.  Some of them are doing that already, along with high level Party Cronyism.  (George Soros, for example, currently plays both ends of anti-Americanism against the middle.)
   

---

Breaking the Media:  There are only three branches of government, and the Media is not one of them.  The Media is not any part of the Constitutional government.  So, what happens when we take the News Media essentially out of governmental existence, and break the "Crony" relationship between Big Media companies and the whole Field of Journalism, and the actual running of the American Government? 

The Good: 

1. The highly privileged "Media" would lose their privileged status and go back to being private sector entities, like the rest of us who are not in government.  They would then have the same access to power that the rest of us have.  No recognized special press credentials, no office space in the White House or any other government buildings, Air Force One, etc., no inclusion in travel entourages, and no access to power any different than yours and mine.  They could just try to elbow their way into the citizen's gallery, and stay behind the rope-line, like the rest of us. 
   
2. Politicians and competing candidates would get their messages out to the public via government publishing, new government broadcast channels, websites and social media, without the need for Media "press conferences" not of their choosing.  No need for any Press Secretary or for any dealings with the Media at all, scheduled or otherwise. 
   
3. No Media "Monitors" for debates.  A simple time-keeper is all that is necessary, and even that could be a robotic, electro-mechanical activity.  Debaters draw straws to see who goes first, second, third, fourth, etc.   Each in turn makes an opening statement; then, each debater, in turn, gets his limited time to speak, after which his microphone and camera are turned off and the next one's microphone and camera are turned on.  No audience; no audience response; no "probing" questions from any non-debater; no one speaking out of turn; just debaters going at it, one at a time.  Recorded, for all time, published, broadcast and posted, unedited, on-line, in full video and in full English transcript, for all to read and replay.  Permanently. 
   

The Bad: 

1. This will be resisted as much as breaking the Parties, if not more.  The Media will have many allies among sitting elected government officers who are and have been highly dependent upon the Media for their positions.  They have a mutual interest in keeping the Media in high public esteem. 
2. A lot of politicians - perhaps most of them - are actually more actors than real people.  The Media provides their only "stage".  Without Media support, many of these politicians will be revealed as nothing but empty suits and polished political smiles. 
3. There will be a lot of political screaming about "freedom of the press".  But the press will still be free.  Just no longer an operative part of the government.  They can write anything they want to write, publish anything they want to publish, broadcast anything they want to broadcast.  They just won't have any more access to government than Thomas Payne had, and no one in the government will be required to kiss the Media's ring. 

The Ugly: 

1. The Media will rapidly lose market-share to government-established broadcast channels, publishing, on-line websites and social media.  New public channels to keep the public informed may open up for individual elected officials and competing candidates, as well as channels for whole branches of Constitutional government. 
   
2. A "Crony" relationship may still exist between various office holders and various journalists related to debts owed, and some of these Crony debts may be large indeed.  There may develop subterranean cooperation to "scoop" opposition politicians and keep the Media on top of "News" reporting.  But nothing they publicly say will be "official".  Big-time news media will be destroyed. 
   
3. Many fired, disenfranchised, once-upon-a-time millionaire journalists may join the ranks of the anti-American revolutionary-anarchist groups they helped to create, feed and prop up over many decades. 
   

---

Breaking Taxation:  What happens when we put the Fair tax on the Fast Track and suddenly, overnight, eliminate the Income Tax, the Inheritance Tax, Property Tax, and every other form of tax except for a retail sales tax, paid at the cash register? 

The Good: 

1. No more worry about getting your 501(c)(3) approval, or anything like it.  No more charitable deductions; no more non-profit or not-for-profit complexities to work out.  No more deductions, because, there is no more income tax to deduct them from.  All those IRS rules of behavior are out the window. 
   
2. No more filing any annual tax statements, for there are no more income taxes.  Your net income is your gross income.  What you make is none of the government's business.  The IRS is rendered obsolete. 
   
3. Everyone pays it.  Priests, Ministers, Rabbis, Criminals, Smugglers, Criminal Aliens, no exceptions; everyone who buys anything at retail pays at the cash register. 
   
4. The entire government is fully funded, including Social Security.  No more SS deductions from paychecks. 
   
5. The entire tax code is out the window and in the dumpster. 
   
6. If you want to start a business, just start one.  You don't have to say a word to the federal government. 
   
7. Off-shore and international business would nearly stampede to the US; we would be required to seriously vet and restrict approval of those businesses that want to establish or re-establish factories or facilities in America to keep from being overloaded with new major companies. 
   
8. This would be the biggest single crushing blow to Cronyism as it exists between government and big billionaire and big business today.  Evil men like George Soros, and evil enterprises like Microsoft, Google, Ford Foundation, etc., would all quite suddenly lose their ongoing, ever-growing hold on sitting politicians, except for "debts owed" from previous Crony deals.  Almost the whole reason for our incredibly huge and incredibly complex tax code is to hide all the corruption and Cronyism between the sitting government and the established Ruling Class Club. 
   
9. The "Crony" relationship between elected government officials and IRS regulating bureaucrats will be broken, for now.  The IRS could be mostly if not totally shut down, with no effect on voting patterns, because IRS employees are almost totally solid Marxocrat Party-dependent voters.  That will not change, but if it does, it will be for the better. 
   
10. All American citizens would receive their monthly Fair-Tax "Prebate" payments, amounting to more than the Communist government's fixed wages of Cuban workers, but without having to work for them.  It's a monthly payment from the US government to the US citizenry. 
    

The Bad: 

1. Every "Establishment" office holder who has not yet been impeached from office, no matter what Party, will fight against this tooth and tong.  The Crony Club that today owns the Parties will spend gazillions to defeat the effort.  Embedded Illegal Corruption will go to the wall in opposition to anything like the Fair Tax, which will take the whole tax code out of existence.  Riches, corporations and even whole industries and many livelihoods depend on it.  All who feed at the US Treasury feeding trough will fight like hell to keep the taxes flowing, and ever increasing.  It's the biggest flow of money on earth. 
   

The Ugly: 

1. Many among the newly unemployed IRS bureaucrats who have suddenly joined the ranks of the unemployed will be moved to join radical anti-American revolutionary and anarchistic groups.  Many if not most will become chronically unemployed, because they don't know how to make a living on their own.  There are millions of them, and they are all exploitable by evil Marxists, Moslems and Globalists. 
   

---

Breaking Regulation:  What happens when we begin shutting down gigantic federal agencies and bureaucracies and firing untold millions of government drones and petty bureaucrats?  Will the earth die for lack of bureaucratic control?  Will farmers be able to farm on their own, and will other businesses be able to run themselves without government regulation?  Will America cease to function due to lack of government expertise on everything? 

The Good: 

1. Harmful and unconstitutional entities like the EPA and harmful unconstitutional laws and regulations like the DDT ban would simply be declared null and taken out of existence.  If it isn't in Article 1 Section 8 it is unconstitutional, short of any Constitutional Amendment to make it constitutional.  Millions of lives could be saved every year from mosquito and biting fly born diseases ranging from Malaria and Zika, with the simple lifting of the ban on harmless-to-the-planet DDT.  And that's just one small example. 
   
   I will go one farther than I went at Declare It Null.  A President alone, or a Congress alone, should be able to simply declare any law, legal precedent, regulation, action or federal government entity null and void, if it is in fact unconstitutional on its face.  That's what the Supreme Court did in Maybury v Madison, and there is no valid legal reason that the other two co-equal branches of government could not do the exact same thing.  The Constitution nowhere grants any one branch any constitutional  interpretive authority above that of the other two co-equal branches. 
   
2. Billions of dollars would be saved for each bureaucracy closed.  Deficit spending would end.  Existing regulations would die with the unconstitutional bureaucracies that unconstitutionally created them and that unconstitutionally enforces them. 
   
3. The completely unconstitutional passage of regulations, with full force of law behind them, by nameless, faceless, unelected, unrepresentative and unaccountable bureaucrats would end.  Laws would go back to originating in Congress, being enforced by the Presidency and being adjudicated by the judiciary.  Very simple; nothing to it. 
   
4. The hidden tendency toward "Sovietizing" America would end.  Our bureaucracies are exactly like the old Soviet Union's pyramid of bureaucracies (soviets) that all reported upward to the Supreme Soviet (akin to our Cabinet), which in turn reported to the Dictator (akin to our President).  Constantly growing Bureaucracy is a sneaky way of moving America out from under her Constitution and into a Dictatorship, disguised as ever increasingly benign and caring social government.  The Dictator proposes, the Soviet disposes.  Unconstitutionally. 
   

The Bad: 

1. Untold millions of government employees would be unemployed, many chronically unemployed, because they have never done anything useful in their lives.  The Washington Beltway and the so-called Washington-Boston-New York Corridor, which today, unlike the rest of the country, is experiencing an economic boom, will be economically devastated.  The whole economy of these cities depends almost entirely on all the highly paid government employees who live there.  They would go from boom to depression, overnight.  Every business in those areas will be in deep trouble.  It will be so bad there that there may well be blood in the streets. 
   
   All things are temporary.  Nothing good comes without cost. 
   

The Ugly: 

1. Big time bureaucrats, like big time politicians, enjoy tight Crony relationships with the Donor-Owner-Ruling-Class Establishment types, too.  That includes a tight Crony relationships with the Media, Scientism and Academia.  These are powerful forces that will not stand idly by while their sources of income and favorable regulations are hung out to dry.  There will be very loud, highly visible and even legal opposition.  Al Gore will go bananas. 
2. Again and again, Republicrats show that they are not conservative, even as they charge Trump with not being conservative enough.  His recently announced "Child Care" program shows that he is not a conservative; but, he never was.  He simply is not an ideologue, of any particular variety.  He has no political ideology.  (Neither does the Republicrat Party.)  Child Care would be another new unconstitutional social "benefit"; true enough.  But Trump doesn't know any better. 
   
   What's the Republicrat Party's excuse for merely seeking to do unconstitutional benefits better, or for limiting benefits to the "safety net" only.  Do you see any safety net in Article One Section Eight?  That's funny, neither do I.  Yet the Republicrat Party thinks there is one, and that they can manage it better than the Marxocrats. 
   
   (The Political Parties, with Marxist Ideology driving the bus, conjures the "need" for a federal government "safety net" into being.  How?
   1.  They publicly mock and unconstitutionally legally suppress the only religion whose core theological virtues are Faith, Hope, and - guess what - Charity. 
   2.  They drive the national economy into near depression, eliminating jobs and growing unemployment, poverty and homelessness, while increasing unfunded liabilities, increasing civil dependency at the expense of civil independence, and further enriching themselves in the process.  (Few are the politicians who enter office rich, but many are they who become rich in office.) 
   3.  They make those citizens who are still disposed to be charitable less charitable than they would be, because so many of them have been driven into near survival mode themselves. 
   4.  They point to all the jobless, homeless, impoverished citizens, most of whom they created, and then publicly stump for a bigger and bigger federal government Safety Net.)
   
   What's the Republicrat Party's excuse for never stopping any single unconstitutional thing Obamunism has done in the last almost 8 years?  Why are they so horrified over Trump's Child Care when they couldn't even slow down our deficit spending and wild increase in national debt and even more wild increases in unfunded liabilities?  When they took impeachment off the table?  In calling Trump "Not Conservative!" is the pot calling the kettle black here?  
   
   The Republicrat Party has been playing political defense so long, and making political compromises with Marxist bills for so many decades that they no longer recognize violations of the Constitution when they compromise them into being.
   
   That's how we got here.  They don't read the Constitution. 
   
   Either that or they are in on the treachery. 
   

---

Breaking Dissimilation:  What happens when native born Americans wake up to the fact that,

1. today's flood of "immigrants" is not coming here to assimilate or become part of us, but to escape the worse conditions elsewhere and take what they can get from us; and
   
2. the Moslems among them are coming as part of a plan of "Immigration Jihad" to eventually assimilate us into them, or just kill us; and
   
3. all of American Marxism's and Globalism's invented Divide and Conquer "disenfranchised" groups are intent on dissimilation, not assimilation, and the tearing down of America as founded? 

Thomas Sowell pointed out in "Ethnic America" the astounding fact that American blacks of slave ancestry are the only ethnic group in America that has never fully assimilated, and that is being kept from full assimilation, not by honest history, but by false indoctrination and persistent political agitation.  That evil political agitation has been so successful that this population, almost totally and quite consistently, massively votes to support the very Political Party that originally enslaved them, caused the Civil War, and fought for many, many generations to keep them down.   

America was never racist.  The Marxocrat Party alone was racist. 

American native-born blacks simply don't know that, in their majority. 

The Marxocrat Party and it's Crony donor-owners like George Soros are seeking the destruction of Constitutional America while promoting Suicidal Diversity with a social happy-face on it, and surreptitiously promoting Class Warfare under the guise of Social Justice.  

No one in government is stopping any of this.  The Republicrat Party is "Conservative" in name only.  They have gone along with and cooperated with every bit of the social destruction of Obamunism, and there is no reason to assume they will not oppose a President Trump, or anyone else who tries to shut the borders and enforce existing immigration law. 

Public statements and political speeches aside, both "Establishment" Parties fully cooperate to keep our borders open, grant amnesty and eventual citizenship to all illegal intruders, eliminate American national sovereignty and defeat Donald Trump.  That is what they are all doing, with near full support of academia and news media. 

Just as they have supported Obamunism in everything it has done, the Republicrat Party may be expected to support Madam Hillary in everything she does, and they may be expected to continue to oppose Trump just as ferociously as they are opposing him now.  Obviously, they are in on the sedition, while pretending to oppose it. 

They are not "Conservative"; they exist to exist, and to hold and grow government power, and to maintain their valued membership status in the high society Establishment Club.  They, too, are anti-American, the people know it, more and more are becoming aware of it, and that's why the Trump campaign is inexorably gaining ground. 

This law was, once upon a time, applied against Marxists in America, but, no more.  Marxism now owns the Marxocrat Party and has made serious inroads into the Republicrat Party.   Through Cultural Marxism, Ideological Marxism has now weaseled its way into the collective American psyche to such a degree that Marxism is now considered to be just another harmless political opinion, despite its unchanged violent intentions toward America and the rest of the world. 

At this level of politics, at this stage in our national destruction, saying "I disagree with what you say but will defend to the death your right to say it" is tantamount to saying "I disagree with your intent to behead me, rape and enslave my wife and crucify my children, but I will defend to the death your right to accomplish it."  We are, quite stupidly, allowing our own mortal enemies, who shouldn't even be here, to twist our national principle of Freedom of Speech into a national suicide pact.  And to twist it to speak against America and the majority only, as per the new government imposed social rules of Political Correctness. 

The Smith Act should be applied against Islam, as well as against Marxism, not so much for its religious claims as for its violent words, intent and instructions to its disciples, inciting harm, murder and mayhem against all unbelievers.  Mohammed's Koran is every bit as violently opposed to the very existence of America as is Marx's Communist Manifesto and Das Kapital.  The seditious words are right there for the reading.  Like Marxism, Islam's very purpose for being is to conquer the world by force. 

But that's just for openers.  What about the increasing population of native dissident groups created by the Marxocrat Party program to Divide and Conquer America, the Alinskyite organizations and all the purposely invented "disenfranchised" and "aggrieved" groups who hate America, or white people, or Christianity, or men, or heterosexuals, or normal families? 

1. The Hippies and Yippies of yesterday who burned, looted and rioted, and who very publicly burned and even urinated and defecated on the American Flag to show their blind hatred of America.  To the encouragement and the applause of academia and the News Media. 
   
2. The La Raza anti-white racist "Movement" demonstrates and agitates for the usurpation of a vast amount of American sovereign territory, sometimes to "return" it to Mexico, sometimes to create a nation called Azatlan, to be dictatorially ruled by members of the race associated with the Aztecs. 
   
3. The Soros-funded Occupy Wall Street Alinskyite "movement" that demonstrated and paraded with Communist flags and banners.  (Who can forget the starry-eyed, air-headed drive-by news-babe who declared, on the air, "I haven't seen any Communist flags", as all the bright red hammer-and-sickle flags paraded past right behind her, on camera.) 
   
4. The Black Lives Matter movement, again funded by Soros, and virtually lied into being by the Marxist News Media, who's slogans and banners call for the wanton murder of police officers, and who have actually ambushed and murdered police officers. 
5. Attorneys General, Police Officials, Mayors, Governors and even the President who issued, sanctioned or stood by and allowed official orders to local police to "stand down" or back off to allow rioters to riot, loot, burn and destroy, and who falsely blamed police officers for the violence, and who in any way held back or interfered with local police from doing their sworn duty. 
   

Don't look now, but all of that is Sedition.  It is criminal activity. 

The Smith Act should be updated to add a "banishment" clause to the punishment.  Anyone convicted of sedition, besides any prison sentence, should have their American citizenship and voting rights revoked, and have their names added to a Persona Non Grata list, so that if they ever leave the country for any reason, they will never be allowed to return.  

So what happens when a new President or a new Congress actually learns or relearns what the word Sedition actually means, and begins to put a stop to all this unconstitutional, illegal, seditious and treasonous nonsense? 

The Good: 

1. The borders will be closed, borders security fiercely enforced, and all immigration stopped completely, as it was from 1924 until 1965.  Temporary student and work visas and "Green Cards" should similarly be shut down.  This would allow time to find and deport all illegals, as they were deported under FDR, Truman and Eisenhower.  And it would allow time for proper assimilation into American culture of all legal immigrants, of which there are many. 
   
2. All illegal aliens should be systematically rounded up, tried for their crimes and deported, without reservation.  There is no such thing as an "anchor baby"; that's an unconstitutional popular myth.  If any child born in America is born of illegal intruders, and is not born of American citizen parents, that child is not an American citizen.  In the interest of not breaking families up, whole families should be deported. 
   
3. Moslems should be denied citizenship; those who are citizens should have their citizenship permanently revoked.  They should be denied all rights of citizenship, especially the right to vote.  They should be removed from government employment and military ranks, denied any security clearances and work on any government contracts.  Hopefully, this would cause massive voluntary deportation. 
   
4. Moslems should be systematically rounded up and deported, as enemy aliens intent on harming the American common good and domestic tranquility.  The Koran itself instructs all Moslems to terrorize and kill unbelievers, in no uncertain terms.  Adherence to the Koran is, in and of itself, sedition.  The Koran is every bit as seditious as is the Communist Manifesto. 
   
5. Moslems should be denied visas and any access to America for any reason.  If and when legal immigration is allowed again, Moslems should be denied immigration to America, as well as student, work and travel visas. 
   
6. Ideally, everything said here about Moslems should be applied to Marxists too, but that's a tougher nut to crack.  Ideological Marxism is now so thoroughly embedded and solidly ensconced throughout American society that it may well be impossible.  We would have to deport virtually the entire Marxocrat Party, for instance.  We certainly need a "conversion" effort, through "Constitutional Evangelization" or honest education.  But died-in-the-wool revolutionaries and anarchists, when they can be identified, certainly need to be stripped of high office, military uniform, security clearance, government employment and government contract employment.  That would be a start. 
   

The Bad: 

1. Government, at all levels, is involved in the "Open Borders, End of American Sovereignty" globalist, anti-nation sedition.  Many American cities have declared themselves to be "Sanctuary Cities" open to all illegal alien intrusion.  The American President is purposely keeping the borders open and refusing to enforce immigration laws.  His Marxocrat Party actually sponsors the effort, and the "opposition" Republicrat Party agrees with it. 
   

The Ugly: 

1. The Latin illegal intruders do not come here to assimilate, or to become American and participate in Americanism, or for any altruistic or entrepreneurial reasons at all.  They are coming, partially, because of Marxocrat Party advertisements and lures and instructions on how to get food stamps, welfare benefits, free education and medical care.  And partially to escape corrupt government and the horrible economic conditions inevitably caused by corrupt government.  Environments of crime, chaos, poverty and uncertainty.  They don't even know what liberty is, or how to properly apply it, or how to take care of themselves.  They come from being poorly taken care of by government, to a place where they will be better taken care of by government. 
   
2. The claim that most Latin illegal intruders are Catholic rings hollow.  Most of them are Catholic the same way that most Americans today are Catholic, which is to say, Catholic in name only.  They will never vote Republicrat.  They are coming here for what they can get, and nothing else.  They will vote, when they vote, legally or illegally, the straight Marxocrat Party ticket.  That's the "Santa Clause" vote.  They will vote themselves more and more benefits, period.  And that's why the Marxocat Party is behind this particular project of anti-American sedition: to utterly destroy the Republicrat Party as a political entity. 
   
3. The Moslem illegal intruders are part of the new wave of Islamic Jihad, known as Immigration Jihad; the old Jihad of the sword, having failed over the last many centuries, is now Old School, within Islam.  The New School intends to migrate across our borders and eventually out-populate us, and then devour us.  Now that we have been tricked into contraception, abortion and all sorts of sterile sexual perversions, and our "natural" population growth is nearly flat and approaching non-replacement levels, if that doesn't change, they will certainly succeed.  The average Moslem man has four wives and twenty sons, every one of which is on welfare, just like their father. 
   
   That's the New School long term plan of Islamic Jihad. 
   
   The New School short term plan of Islamic Jihad involves establishing and growing enclaves, or Ummahs, all over America and all over other Western nations.  Each of these grows and gradually becomes a little mini Dar al Islam in which Sharia Law is practiced, regardless of the law of the land.  They will become "no-go" zones, which non-Moslems will enter only at their own peril.  The residents will consider it to be their own sovereign territory, and the host nation will not get that sovereign territory back without a fight.  These Islamic enclaves will grow and spread and metastasize.  And from them will emerge "pop-up" Jihadists who will terrorize the surrounding non-Islamic population from time to time, and return to the protection of the Ummah.  Just to keep the non-Moslem population properly terrorized. 
   
   That's the new short term plan of Islamic Jihad.  All the phony hand-wringing and investigation into "who radicalized" the latest pop-up Jihadist who killed a bunch of citizens is misplaced; the only place you have to look is in the Koran. 
   
   "We will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they set up with Allah that for which He has sent down no authority, and their abode is the fire, and evil is the abode of the unjust." --Koran 3:151
   
   "When your Lord revealed to the angels: I am with you, therefore make firm those who believe. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them. --Koran 8:12
   
   "Leave them then till they meet that day of theirs wherein they shall be made to swoon (with terror):" --Koran 52.45
   
   "He it is Who caused those who disbelieved of the followers of the Book to go forth from their homes at the first banishment you did not think that they would go forth, while they were certain that their fortresses would defend them against Allah; but Allah came to them whence they did not expect, and cast terror into their hearts; they demolished their houses with their own hands and the hands of the believers; therefore take a lesson, O you who have eyes!" --Koran 59.2
   
4. Comrade Obama (peace be upon him) knows all this; he is participating in it.  He is enabling it.  He will never stop it.  He will cover it up and lie about it.  He is both Marxist and Moslem, and he is a Machiavellian Globalist dictator wannabe.  He is rabidly anti-American and anti-Western, and he, and his Presidency, is why all of this, and more, is happening.  If he didn't originate it, he certainly put it on steroids and amped it all up to a fevered pitch.  (See the Obamunism pages.) 
   
5. All the "Never Trumpsters" among the Republicrats and others who pretend to be conservative, but are not, who hold that Trump may be worse than Hillary, because he may turn out to be the world's worst Fascistic dictator, have a little problem with lack of evidence for that presumption.  Mohammed had his Koran; Marx had his Das Kapital and Communist Manifesto; Hitler had his Mein Kamph. 
   
   So where, pray tell, is Trump's manifesto?  When has he ever expressed any globalist, political "rule the world" ambitions or any other such anti-American or anti-liberty political sentiments? 
   
   Politically speaking, he is an innocent babe in the woods. 
   
   The Republicrat Party, on the other hand, has proved it supports Globalism by not stopping Obamunism, and its anti-Americanism by not lifting a finger to stop the systematic destruction of Constitutional America.  The only person these "conservatives" oppose is Trump, who just might upset the whole Establishment apple cart, because the Republicrat Party is in that cart, along with the Marxocrats. 
   

---

Breaking Obamacare:  If one single blatantly unconstitutional law could be the linchpin upon which revival of Constitutional Supremacy in American law swings, it is Obamacare. 

The whole Obamacare bill was Constitutionally out-of-scope to begin with, since neither medical practice, nor pharmacy, nor any kind of insurance may be found among the Article 1 Section 8 "limited and enumerated powers" of the federal government.  That makes it strictly a matter of state and lower jurisdiction, not federal. 

It was unconstitutional when it was first conceived, even before it was ever written, let alone passed, let alone signed, let alone adjudicated.  Which shows how out-of-touch with their own Constitution are all three branches of federal government, and both Political Parties, who are actually running the federal government completely outside the rules, limitations and constraints of the Constitutional anyway.  It's the Political Parties that took America off the Constitutional rails. 

• Every Senator and every Representative who voted to pass the Obamacare bill violated his sworn oath of office and violated the Constitution to do it. 
• The President who signed the Obamacare bill into law violated his sworn oath of office and violated the Constitution to do it. 
• Every Supreme Court Justice who voted to sustain the Constitutionality of the Obamacare law violated his sworn oath of office and violated the Constitution to do it. 

All that is needed to prove these statements is the ability to read. 

Federal government officials of all three branches who supported and did not oppose Obamacare are either guilty of criminal malfeasance in office, or they are malicious traitors against Constitutional America.  Which is to say, stupid, or evil; one or the other.  In either case, unfit for office. 

So what happens when a new President and/or a new Congress decides to return to rule by Constitution, get rid of all that is unconstitutional, and in the process simply declares all of Obamacare to be null, void, no law and dead? 

The Good: 

1. A new Constitutionalist President, and/or a new Constitutionalist Congress, could shut the Obamacare law down and take it out of existence by simply declaring it null and unconstitutional.  If the Court could do that, as it did in Maybury v Madison, then the President can do it, and the Congress can do it.  There is nothing in the Constitution that grants any unique interpretive authority exclusively to any one of the three co-equal branches of government. 
   
2. A Constitutionalist House would draw up articles of impeachment against every sworn officer of the federal government, all three branches, who violated his oath of office in support of Obamacare.  A Constitutionalist Senate would try those impeachment cases and remove those officers from office. 
   
3. If Congress for any reason failed to impeach these cases, a Constitutional President could order the Attorney General to bring charges against all offenders ranging from criminal malfeasance in office to treason, and seek to get these people out of office and into prison where they belong.  Every Senator and every Congressman who voted to pass Obamacare, and every Supreme Court Justice who voted to sustain it, thereby committed an act of criminal malfeasance, at the very least, violating the Constitution and their own solemnly sworn Oaths of Office. 
   

The Bad: 

1. With the nullification of Obamacare, there would be a period of great confusion in the medical/pharmaceutical/insurance markets.  The more government plays a role in it, the worse it will be; the less government interferes with it, the sooner it will straighten itself out.  The Ending Socialized Medicine pages recommended some State and lower level new legislation that could end the "Billing Code" rules that currently hamper the free practice of medicine, and to make patients themselves the sole beneficiaries of medical and pharmaceutical insurance policies.  Free market forces and open competition would then radically reduce costs of medicine, drugs and even insurance, and we would be back on the road to achieving that which we had before Obamacare:  the best health care system in the world. 
   

The Ugly: 

1. Obamacare, all by itself, proves that there is no such thing as Conservatism left in government or in any existing Political Party.  If the definition of Conservatism in America means Constitutionalism, then the Republicrat Party is certainly not Conservative.  This is proved every time any so-called conservative spokesman recommends that we "repeal and replace" Obamacare. 
   
   Replace?  Excuse me? 
   
   It's unconstitutional.  It's out of constitutional scope.  Yet, Republicrats want to replace it with a "better" unconstitutional law.  There are none so blind as they who will not see. 
   
   The whole, sole reason the Republicrat Party not only cooperated but lead the charge in defeating the Ted Cruz candidacy was not only that he loved America as Trump does, but that he knew and loved the Constitution, word for word, and intended to restore it.  Can't have that, and Party Politics too.  At least Trump didn't know the Constitution.  Yet.  But we can pray that he learns it. 
   

---

Breaking Public Education:  What happens when the American Citizenry wakes up to the fact that public (government controlled) education is loaded down with Marxist Disinformation, Indoctrination and Propaganda which is aimed against America, against Christianity, against the normative family, against private property and free markets, against men, against white people, against Nature, against sovereign nations, against liberty, and in favor of Scientism, Socialism and Globalism? 

We're talking all levels of education here, from Kindergarten through advanced university degrees.  For proof you need look no further than Madam Hillary's college thesis, written on the Marxist thug Saul Alinsky and his master-plan to take down American institutions, and ultimately America herself, from the inside, through "organization", deception, treachery and deceit.  She learned all that in school. 

If anyone in American politics today is more Alinskyite than Comrade President Obama (peace be upon him) it would be Madam Hillary.  Alinsky deceit and treachery forms the core of her political ideology.  She is the proud product of American Academe, and her unique ability to mesmerize, organize and incite Marxism's Useful Idiots and the typical Marxocrat Moron Vote to social and political action is the main reason she heads the Marxocrat Party today.  I mean besides being married to Billary. 

The Marxocrat Party, through Alinsky deception, creates, feeds, grows, incites and agitates various minority groups into "aggrieved" and "disenfranchised" and "discriminated against" and angered organizations, whose anger is directed at America, white people, Christians, men, heterosexuals, Republicrats, all social institutions, the majority and the status quo. 

It all begins in kindergarten. 

The plan is to either grow the number and size of enraged minorities and unite them all into a "Big Tent" majority vote, or, to incidentally and "accidentally" set the nation aflame with chaos and disorder, ripe for a Machiavellian crack down.  All of the Divide and Conquer groups are Marxist educational inventions, fed, grown, agitated and enraged by the Marxocrat Party politics.  No exceptions. 

Formal education is where journalists learn journalism, writers learn to write, politicians learn politics, historians learn history, scientist learn science, etc., etc., etc.  Marxists of all varieties know this, and that's why education is their first target. 

So what happens when a new President and/or a new Congress wakes up to the value of the Constitution as Supreme Law of the Land, recognizes the out-of-constitutional-scope nature of the Department of Education, and just shuts it down, and shuts off all federal funding of public education by simple declaration of unconstitutionality? 

The Good: 

At the formative (K-12) levl:

1. The best way to get a dependent institution, like a dependent individual citizen, off of the addiction to federal funding dependency is to break it.  Shut it off.  When it's sink or swim time, public schools will either privatize and run themselves efficiently on nothing other than competitive tuition revenues, or go under, leaving the field to home schooling and to existing (and new) private and parochial schools.  
2. Professional educators will deal with students and parents, and maybe local governments, but not the federal government.  Local governments will be put in the position of determining how much local tax revenue they can afford to pay for public education without federal funding, and perhaps go the privatization route, or close schools altogether. 
   
3. The more any school has to depend on parents paying tuition, the less they will do to displease parents.  Those public schools that privatize or public schools that survive will most likely abandon their Marxist ideology in favor of pure economic survival.  Because if mama ain't happy, ain't nobody happy.  And that's as it should be. 
   
4. Those schools, of whatever variety, that please parents will economically prosper, and classical education, in the old fashioned meaning of that term, will make a come back. 
   
5. Many existing home-schoolers will be approached by relatives and neighbors to teach their children too, and some of these may develop into new variations of schools, as happened before the invention of public (government) schools.  Home schooled children are demonstrably better educated than parochial school children, who are demonstrably better educated than public school children.  Surprise. 
   

At the advanced college and university level:

1. Comrade Obama's dictatorially established and quite unconstitutional government monopoly on the whole student loan industry must be nullified and taken out of existence.  This may mean existing student loan debt forgiveness, since the loans were illegally made.  But the government process for student loans must be ended.  It only feeds Marxist power over people by the government. 
   
2. A constitutionalist President or Congress would also cut off all government funds or grants to colleges and universities as out-of-scope federal expenditures.   Student loans and federal subsidies are what allow academia to exponentially raise tuition beyond citizen affordability, pushing students into serious debt to government, while academia is swimming in cash, out of which they overpay themselves, donate to the Marxocrat Party and ever increasingly teach Scientism, anti-Christianity and anti-Americanism to their pupils.
3. Government scientific research and/or defense contracts with universities should be terminated with all universities whose guiding principles and/or majority of faculty favor Marxist or Islamic or other Globalist principles over American Constitutional principles.  Sensitive government research contracts, especially those requiring security clearances, should be moved to institutions more favorably disposed toward America. 
   

The Bad: 

1. There would be sudden interruptions in formative education, some of them long term, and interruptions in extra curricular activities, especially sports, might even be permanent.  This may anger many citizens otherwise favorably disposed to the changes, because high-school football and other sports have become major local cultural institutions, with whole counties and even whole states full of dedicated aficionados.  This is even more true at the college level of sports. 
   
2. Schools that suddenly tried to run themselves without federal funding might have to either cut pay or cut teachers if they didn't cut extra curricular items to the bone.  Teacher's unions would ever increasingly need to somehow direct their "collective bargaining" efforts to all the individual parents who pay tuition.  A tough thing to do.  If they go on strike, they go out of business entirely. 
   
3. Many of the biggest and most expensive universities would be in dire financial straights overnight.  Very, very few student families could ever afford tuition rates as they exist, and with the government student loan scam out of operation, enrollments may dry up to near nothing.  Saddled with unbreakable gigantic salaries and benefits of tenured professors, they would have to come up with new rules of tenure, and everything else, just to survive at all. 
   
4. Loss of grants, subsidies and government contracts, combined with the end of the government student loan program, would certainly end perpetually spiraling tuition costs, but it might also result in the closing of whole departments or even whole universities. 
   
   (They could start by cutting departments of "White Privilege", "LGBTQ Studies", "Feminine Studies", "Black Studies", "Queer Therory", "New Gender Invention", "Climate Change", "Global Sustainability", "Utopian Diversity", "Evil Oil", "Toxic Waste", "Social Engineering", etc., etc., etc.  However did mankind and the earth itself survive before Marxified professors came along?) 
   

The Ugly: 

1. Many sitting politicians will strongly resist any action that threatens their own alma maters.  Many of them majored or minored in White Privilege, and/or Queer Theory and similar subjects, which explains why they support the President's unconstitutional program to legally force all American institutions to let men into lady's rooms. 
   
2. The Donor-Owner Establishment Ruling Class that owns and directs the Political Parties will not stand idly by while their primary source of indoctrinating the citizenry into blessing Globalism over national sovereignty just goes away.  Nor will their News Media.  They will put up a very public, very loud, highly visible, megabucks fight to maintain the status quo.  As usual, they will find creative ways to make their efforts not look anti-American while they work to destroy sovereign America. 
   

---

Breaking Culture Rot:  What happens when (and if) We The People suddenly one day wake up to the folly of our own unlimited mercy, our own super-toleration and our own progressive compromising with evil that brought degenerate and decadent human behavior to prominence and dominance over the whole of our formerly Christian American Culture?  Will we be strong enough to reverse the trend, and begin "uncompromising" and doing the necessary dividing to return America to simple sanity, let alone back to a decent and admirable human culture? 

Let me put it this way:  If we do not change course, American culture is doomed, and the nation, and all the high ideals of Constitutional America, are doomed with it.  Constitutional America is absolutely irreplaceable.  So we have to ask ourselves if it is worth the ugly and nasty super-divisive efforts it will take to save it, and make our decision, one way or the other.  It is a time of dividing, or of going under. 

Despite the flagrant, categorical lies of the Obama Regime, Madam Hillary, the Marxocrat Party and their wholly owned academia and news media, Islam had absolutely no part in America's history.  Islam had no part in the founding of America, the development of the American ideology, the framing and ratifying of her Constitution, or her ongoing history, outside of our first war with the Islamic Barbary Pirates and our current ongoing internal and external episodes of murderous Islamic Jihad. 

Whenever you hear the term "Radical Islamic Terrorism" you should replace that term in your mind with "Murderous Islamc Jihad" because that is a more precise term.  The only truly "radical" Moslems are those who do not do what Islam says to do, which is, to wage eternal Jihad against the whole unbelieving world.  The Koran says so in no uncertain terms. 

America came to be as a Christian nation, and nothing else.  Here are the original official Colonial denominations of Christianity: 

For openers, our first Colony of Massachusetts became about as theocratic as what that Colony's founders had been lead to escape in Europe.  You had to be Congregational before you could hold any political office, or vote; and everyone was legally required to pay tithes to the Congregational Church.  In fact, when Jesuits appeared, the Congregational population was so afraid that Catholicism would come to dominate the Colony, that they passed an edict giving Catholics three days to vacate the Colony, under pain of death. 

This fierce denominational-ism softened over the years as the Colonies prospered and hordes of mixed-denomination Christians, including Catholics, kept pouring into all of the Colonies.  As a matter of practicality, they had to become less and less theocratic when the official denomination was outnumbered by members of other denomination. 

It was the Baptists who more or less lead the way toward the initial idea of "freedom of religion" in early America.  They had this doctrine of free will, which made natural sense, and they became "trouble-makers" in multiple Colonies by refusing to pay tithes to official Churches and so forth.  They, and the Methodists, who shared that doctrine, were the up-and-coming, growing denominations that eventually became a political force to be reckoned with, everywhere. 

Free will, freedom of conscience and the requirement to voluntarily cooperate with the unmerited grace that is given, and the ability to reject it, was always present in Christian doctrine.  It had been submerged in social consciousness during and after the Reformation Wars in Europe, out of which emerged Luther's rigid combination of Church and State, in which the crowned heads of domains became the ruthless dictators of religion in their domains.  Nobility often forced the religion of the domain on the people under pain of death.  Thus, this early American "reawakening" of man's Free Will that helped form early American ideology had an affect on the ongoing development of the preexisting Catholic doctrine as well. 

By the time of the Constitution ratification proceedings most of the Colonies had abandoned theocracy as law; while some of them still had official religions, they were not enforced on the populace.  What they feared, at that time, was an emerging Federal Government establishing a federal religion as the official religion of the whole country.  Thus, the First Amendment.  The government could not establish a national religion, and the government could not interfere with anyone's religious practice. 

Freedom of religion was thus established in American federal law. 

Nevertheless, the nation was totally Christian, even if imperfectly; all the various confessions held to the same Commandments and the same Biblical teachings that flowed from them.  The Framers and Ratifiers agreed to disagree on specific denominational theology, but to agree on general and core Chrsitian doctrines held in common.  What Benjamin Franklin called "General Christianity". 

The moral and religious basis for the Declaration of Independence and it's resulting American Constitution was this General Christianity.  It is the basis for our law, and how we tell right from wrong.  And they all recognized the fact that, if the American people were to have such an important role in their own government, in which the people and the government stand equal before the Constitution, then the people had better be "good" people, which is to say, Christian. 

Tocqueville wrote glowingly of the strong relationship between the Christian goodness of the American people and the national Greatness of the American Republic.  That if that relationship were broken, America's "greatness" would cease. 

Perhaps the first fly in the American cultural soup was militant Secularism, born of "Enlightenment" thinking gone off the rails, and always threatening to take us under a politically dominating atheistic theocracy, if that makes any sense.  A legal banning of religion.  Miltiant Secularism gained its first foothold in Western Civilization through the bloody French Revolution.  Clerics and vowed religious were fed to the guillotine along with nobles and aristocrats, to the approving howls of the mobs, until, ultimately, even Robespierre himself lost his head over the nonsense. 

Secularaism was a divorce of God from Nature, which necessitated a divorce between Truth and Man.  Thus began the notion that there is no fixed Truth, there is no fixed moral norm, there is no "certainty" of anything.  There is only "Science", which might one day provide answers for all questions.  But even science had to largely abandon the scientific method, Socratic logic and even reason, in favor of democratic consensus, or Scientism, when real science kept pointing to a beginning point of everything.  That just didn't fit the secularist agenda. 

And everything - everything - became political, for the secularists. 

When Truth does not fit the political agenda, Truth itself is denied. 

Marxism hit the world stage in 1848 with publication of the Communist Manifesto.  The "Springtime of Revolution" ultimately failed in Europe, after much bloodshed, but Marxism became the hot popular topic of debate among the world's intelligentsia, and a fad among many ranking intellectuals.  In America (and everywhere) the slow steady adoption of Marxist principles put the Secularism movement on steroids.  Religion, and especially Christianity, and even more especially Catholicism, was recognized by Marxism to be its mortal enemy.  Marxism could gain no ground in world domination while men believed in God and followed God's Law. 

It may now be seen that Secularism and Marxism have joined forces and now, in practical reality, "own" most of our government, most of our Churches and most of our whole culture.  The effects are everywhere evident. 

Denominations, and even major Catholic Archdioceses, give tacit if not open blessing to everything from artificial contraception, through divorce and remarriage, homosexuality, abortion, swapping genders, Marxist redistribution, open borders and the end of nations, and every Globalist fraud on earth, from Stupid Climate Change to Stupid Unsustainability. 

As does the American legal system and the whole American court system, up and down the line.  With great consistency, the courts, all the way up to the Supreme Court, may be seen to most frequently uphold radical secularism against religion, the immoral against the moral, the organized sodomites against the Christians, the indecent and even the abominable against any local cultural moral norm, the Marxist collectivist/redistributionist agenda against the Constitution, the anti-family argument against the family and the racist minorities against the race of the majority. 

The Courts, the Parties, and even some Churches appear to hate us. 

In one of Bishop Sheen's TV lectures he said that if Satan could once get a man to accept sodomy, he could get that man to accept anything at all.  Anything.  Including even aborting people. 

Thank you, Government (Tax Payer) Paid Professional Educators, for warping young minds through so-called sex education.  Teaching the advisability, normalcy and necessary pharmaceutics and mechanics of "Safe" fornication, "Protected" sodomy, "Responsible" promiscuous casual and recreational sex, and "Discerning" imaginary new "Genders", and "Whatever" sexuality. 

Thank you, Entertainment Industry, including TV, movies, stage and recording, for so strongly establishing open public homosexuality in young minds through pop-culture. 

Thank you, Protestant Denominations who blessed homosexuality and even ordained active homosexual ministers. 

Thank you, Catholic Bishops, Priests and Deacons who opened up Parish communities welcoming unrepentant active homosexuals into Christian community, and often even full participation in Eucharist.  (In your "mixed" sodomite and Catholic Parish community, who wound up converting who?  Which way did the conversions go, between sexual perversion and Christianity?  Do you even know?  How do all the welcomed openly homosexual couples impress the Parish children?) 

Thank you, Libertarians for your "neutrality" and hands-off attitude regarding moral or "social" issues. 

Thank you, Legal Profession and Court System for so persistently and consistently pressing the "rights" of homosexuals to the point of driving Christians out of business, and simultaneously destroying American freedom of religion.  And the Constitution. 

Especially, thank you all you "silent majority" citizens, government officials and religious clerics, for all your politically correct and cowardly silence.  Mustn't rock the boat; mustn't upset anybody.  Just hide in a corner somewhere and suck your thumbs. 

It is always glaringly obvious that the Homo-Nazi Movement is doing precisely what they always falsely accuse Christians of doing to them, which is, 

It's the exact opposite.  They are forcing their immorality on Christians, and they are doing it unconstitutionally, through the corrupted homo-favoring, Christian-hating courts, and not through legislated representative law. 

I can show you the right to the free exercise of Christian religion in the Constitution.  Can anyone show me the right to commit sodomy?  How about in natural law?  Anywhere at all? 

Who is forcing who to do what? 

The unconstitutional use of the courts to establish bogus "rights" is a ploy to get around the rule of subsidiarity, because matters such as homosexual perversion are not federal matters, but subject only to state and lower jurisdictions.   Using the courts is an illegitimate path to circumvent the necessary Constitutional Amendment to establish sodomy as a right in the Constitution. 

It's unconstitutional, yes; but they have done it and gotten away with it, because nobody did anything about it.  And they keep doing it and they keep getting away with it, and sworn elected officers of the government keep not doing anything about it, so they just keep getting away with it. 

So, open public homosexuality is "normal" now.  Is everybody happy? 

Welcome to another tyranny of another minority. 

Having repeatedly failed at inciting successful "popular" revolutions, Marxist global strategy changed, and went underground, and continued it's agenda as "Cultural Marxism".  Beginning with Stalin's insidious "Popular Front" spy ring, and building on that psychological invasion through the successful efforts of the Frankfurt School, ideological Marxism began to, "scientifically", steadily destroy American morality, and with it, America's religion, in the minds of the American citizenry. 

Here is a brief description of the process by Professor Wessel of Bonn, Germany:

For a more detailed description visit The Poison of Cultural Marxism. For a historical perspective on what it has done in South America and what it is doing here, visit New Way Cultural Marxism. 

It was out of this insidious foreign immoral infection that our current immoral American culture emerged.  It did not occur naturally.  It was induced.  And every bit of it that is at the federal level is unconstitutional; it is out of scope for federal government attention, whether in legislation, regulation, executive action or adjudication. 

This applies to the "principle" of Separation of Church and State, to Artificial Contraception, to Abortion, to the Masturbation Industry, to open public homosexuality, to Homo-Marriage, and more; much more. 

Every Supreme Court Justice, President, Senator, Representative or Bureaucrat who had cooperated to bring these abominations into legal existence and protection, or failed to oppose them, violated his oath of office, violated the Constitution and committed an act of criminal malfeasance in office, at the very least, in doing so.  An impeachable criminal offense against America. 

These are all matters properly under State and Local jurisdiction as a matter of simple subsidiarity.  The federal government is not Constituted to handle every question under the sun.  The problem is, our federal government no longer considers itself to be under the Constitution. 

So what happens when a new President and/or a new Congress wakes up to the unconstitutional nature of laws, edicts, regulations and legal precedents contributing to American Culture Rot, and just shuts it all down, and shuts off all federal funding of public abomination by simple declarations of unconstitutionality? 

The Good: 

1. Christian religion will be strengthened and evil will be weakened. 
   
2. National Politics will be moved more out of corruption and back under the Constitution. 
   
3. Judaeo-Christian morality will begin to make a come-back. 
   

The Bad: 

1. Resistance from the top will be fierce.  Crony-Donor Class financiers of evil social disorder like George Soros and all of his sneaky Alinskyite-Marxist Community Organizers, the Marxocrat Party's program of Progressive Socialism, and our almost totally Secularized and Marxified Academia and News Industry will oppose this movement with everything they have. 
   
2. "Aggrieved" groups who have been mal-educated and indoctrinated into being "Disenfranchised" and "Oppressed" will be out in the streets in force, "demonstrating" for the social acceptance and public blessing of evil.  The Femi-Nazis, the Homo-Nazis, the Eco-Nazis and the Racial-Nazis will not go quietly into retirement. 
   
3. Many in these groups have been so successfully artificially radicalized, agitated and antagonized to action that they have no idea that they have become what they believe their own "oppressors" are imagined to be.  Racists, for instance, and Sexists.  In inventing metal illnesses, usually in the form of some phobia or other, with which to brand opponents of their programs, they fail to realize they are making of themselves pretty much what they are branding their opposition with.  None of them see themselves as Catholiphobic, Christaphobic, Judaphobic, or Heterophobic, and yet they are far closer to those imaginary mental illnesses than their hated and despised opposite numbers are to actually being Islamaphobic or Homophobic.  Members of Black Lives Matter, for instance, have been made into stark, raving Honkyphobes and Copaphobes. 
   

The Ugly: 

1. There are always those evil men waiting in the wings for the opportune moment for a Machiavellian crack-down, suspension of the Constitution and establishment of a "benign" dictatorship.  Every Soros-Funded, Marxocrat Party operative Organized anti-American "demonstration" provides just such an opportunity, if it is big enough.  The goal is always to make them bigger and bigger. 
   
2. The coming election, if Trump wins, could provide just such an opportunity, because the Left, top to bottom, would literally go nuts. 
   
3. Both Protestantism and Catholicism are infected with this same insidious Marxist parasite.  Alinsky-Marxism literally invented the CCHD, and I believe it virtually owns the USCCB American Catholic Political Party.  Look at the Perverted Catholic Teaching pages, and the Papal Imperfections pages, and tell me that Marxist ideology has not made its impression on the establishment Catholic hierarchy. 
   

---

Breaking Unions:  What happens when We The People finally wake up and recognize the fact that "Organized Labor" was the first successfully organized Marxist grass-roots revolutionary movement, born of the closing line, "Workers of the World, Unite!", of Karl Marx's 1848 Communist Manifesto? 

What happens when most of America's proud Union Members discover that they, like their fathers before them, are merely pawns in a larger anti-institution game of international revolution? 

What happens when the mobsters and criminal element who think they are running various unions and monopolizing certain union-controlled industries and geographic areas figure out that they, too, are mere pawns of a larger and now not-so-hidden multi-nation strategy of social and national destruction? 

And what happens when Catholic union men learn that Catholicism, too, has been deceived and manipulated by Marxist ideology, as shown by CCC paragraph 2434.  Catholic "Just Wage" teaching today predominantly emphasizes the warped teaching that the purpose of business is, first, to provide jobs with pay sufficient to provide a "dignified livelihood" to worker and family, rather than to produce a product or service for a profit?  From the kid who mows your lawn to the intern, apprentice or trainee, to the paper boy and the fruit picker, all are entitled to a "dignified livelihood" through just wages. 

Taken to its logical conclusion, if rigidly enforced, this would result in no jobs for anyone. 

And that's the point.  That's the real goal.  The destruction of free market wage competition between employers for good employees, and the monopolization of all labor.  Collectivization would be a better term.  The creation of one universal Labor Collective. 

To be fair, Catechism paragraph 2434 includes "taking into account the role and productivity" of the laborer.  But how many Catholic clerics and Catholic teachers today pay any attention to that clause, or even mention it in their teaching? 

The predominant Catholic teaching may be seen to be that if you provide a job to someone, you need to pay him sufficiently to live at the same level as yourself and everyone else.  This is Marxist thinking. 

Only total social sameness = the new Marxist Social Justice. 

Welcome to the collective; welcome to the commune. 

Welcome to Globalism. 

Note well that jobs, wages, labor, labor-employer negotiations, labor arbitration, etc., are not listed among the limited and enumerated powers of government in Article One Section Eight of the Constitution.  That means that the federal government has no legitimate Constitutional business addressing labor, except as any case may relate to contract law.  That makes Labor a matter of State and lower jurisdiction attention, not federal.  As a practical matter, labor is a private sector matter, not public sector. 

Note also that organized labor contracts with the federal government are unconstitutional, in that the federal government is not the employer of laborers; the tax paying American citizens are the paying employers.  If the American citizenry are not a signatory part of the contract, they cannot be bound by it.  Government has no money to pay to labor until it collects it, through taxes, from the American citizenry.  Government is not authorized to bind the American citizenry to contracts it may make with organized labor or any other monopolistic entity. 

So what happens when a new President and/or a new Congress decides to break the relationship between the federal government and organized labor, and recognizes the sinister anti-business, anti-free market, Marxist and Globalist anti-national intentions of Organized Labor, and begins to proactively oppose it as a hostile and destructive alien ideology? 

The Good: 

1. A new President and/or a new Congress would declare all "collective bargaining" for federal employees to be unconstitutional, null and void, because the American taxpayers are not and cannot be any part of the bargaining process, short of holding national elections on all union pay and benefit changes. 
   
2. The Federal Government would cease forthwith from deducting union dues from government paychecks and forwarding them on to unions.  Since the American taxpayers were not part of any union contract they cannot be bound to pay for any part of any union agreement. 
   
3. Union members would be free to maintain their union membership, but they would have to pay their own dues out of their own pockets; no more automatic deductions.  Employees would become aware of their dues when they see their raise in pay.  If they choose to stay in the union, they are free to pay their dues. 
   
4. Any union strike against any part of federal government would result in the permanent unemployment of all participants and barring them from any future government employment, since any strike against government harms the common good of the whole nation. 
   
5. Government, through the courts and through the Attorney Genderal's office, should support private businesses who followed suit and sought to break collective agreements to withhold and pass on union member paycheck union dues.  No employer should have to help their own organized opponents to do their own collecting of dues. 
   

The Bad: 

1. Both the Marxocrat Party and the Republicrat Party, if they still exist, would join their Marxified media and their Marxified academia and their Marxified entertainment industry in loudly and publicly and politically opposing all of this.  All established professional politicians want to be seen and known as public champions of "the working man".  It's a good way to hide their own Marxism. 
   
2. The unions are not without political clout and crony-relationships with all levels of government and the whole crony donor-owner establishment Ruling Class.  Court battles could be huge, further identifying those judges and justices who lean for and against either Constitutional America or Marxist anti-Americanism.  Bottom line, it won't be settled overnight.  It could be a long, drawn out battle. 
   

The Ugly: 

1. There could arise a new "dissimilation" movement among the most corrupt unions, similar to the Soros funded Black Lives Matter Alinskyite organization.  Union thugs like the SIEU members who already bus illegals to the polls to fraudulently vote and who have already demonstrated their ability to help organize, transport and participate in Soros funded rent-a-mob riots, will have a new personal incentive to riot.  I mean demonstrate.   
   
2. There is no telling what the organized crime families who run the unions behind the scenes might do. 
   

---

Breaking Marxism:  What happens when we begin to dismantle the anti-American Marxist parts of American government and American law, and to restore America to running her government and legislating her law in strict accordance with the American Constitution, and restore the Constitution to its proper place as the Supreme Law of the Land? 

Most all of the details of how to dismantle Marxism in America may be found in the other major points in this whole webpage, because just about everything wrong in the whole American culture, from the running of her government to the living of ordinary life as a citizen, can be traced back to the social infection of Marxist thought. 

That is not to say that individual man is not without sin; but to say that every major social movement supporting sin is likely traceable to Secularism and Marxism, or other forms of anti-Christian morality, such as Islam.  Or, to mixed-allegiance rabid anti-Americans such as George Soros, who is not strictly Marxist, or strictly Islamic, or strictly secularist, although he funds and supports all Marxist, Islamic, Secularist, and many, many other movements, so long as they are all anti-American. 

Everyone knows who George Soros is, and everyone knows what he does. 

And that makes my point. 

As one of the richest men on earth, he openly speaks of his enjoyable "hobby" of directing the "managed decline" of national economies and nations, including America.  From his Soros Fund Management to a blue million other "funds", "foundations", and Organizations, every single thing he does, and everything he funds, is anti-nation, anti-American, anti-Israel and anti-order, or anti-social orderliness and normalcy.  He incites chaos, everywhere.  With malice aforethought. 

George Soros has almost single-handedly brought into being and/or guaranteed the success of such anti-American entities as the Obama Presidency and ACORN.  He funds everything from La Raza to Black Lives Matter, the Clinton campaign, National Public Radio, CNN, Planned Parenthood, the American Marxocrat Party, the Black Panthers, MoveOn.org, the Moslem Brotherhood, the Globalist Open Societies Foundations, and the list goes on, seemingly forever.  If it is anti-American, Soros will fund it; if it pre-exists his involvement in it, as soon as he discovers it, he will exploit it to the fullest.  His intent is the "managed decline" of America.  And Western Civilization, right behind it. 

In America, everything he funds is anti-American.  Subversion; indoctrination; propaganda; sedition; revolution; class warfare; race warfare; moral warfare; purposeful disorder and social chaos, and especially, the end of national sovereignty.  Everything he does and everything he funds seeks to harm the common good of man.  He is, to coin a term, a Global Seditionist. 

As I said, everyone knows who he is, and everyone knows what he does. 

So why is he not in prison?  Why are his holdings not confiscated?  Why is he somehow above the law?  The answer is crystal clear, and staring us all right in the face.

Our sitting government supports what he is doing.  Both Parties. 

All three branches. 

A veil of politically correct silence has enveloped us all.  See no evil; hear no evil; speak no evil. 

• Law is only applied against pro-Americans. 
  
• No anti-American is ever charged with any crime. 
  
• No one is ever impeached from office for anything. 
  
• No one is ever excommunicated from the Church for anything. 
  

And there we have it, and here we sit.  The whole American culture rots from the top down, not from the bottom up. 

It is out of this concentrated anti-Americanism, imposed on the citizenry by Secularism, Marxism and Globalism, that have arisen groups of native born citizens who hate America.  Black Americans who were never slaves who hate and despise white Americans who never owned slaves, present the most obvious example.  Their racist hatred is irrational and unreasonable, but real, nonetheless.  They are raised in it, for multiple generations now.  It's taught by their parents and by their teachers and by their most popular journalists. 

As a result, I feel comfortable in stating that a majority of native born black American citizens are racists.  Not all, but certainly a majority.  And those who are not racist have been conditioned by American black culture to keep it to themselves, and keep their non-racist heads down.  Black conservatives or Constitutionalists  are publicly condemned as "House Niggers", "Oreo Cookies", "Uncle Toms" or "Acting White". 

There will be no assimilation into hated white society. 

Many not-so-racist blacks commit the sin of Peter, for which Paul called him out "to his face" in Galatians 2:11.  You may have experienced this if you have black friends.  When you and your black friend are alone, everything is normal.  When another black joins the conversation, there is a slight change.  When more blacks join the group, and they are predominant in number, everything changes.  Your "friend" is more aloof from you, his dialect has changed, and there is a definite sense of being on the outside and not a real part of this supposedly "friendly" group. 

This is only true of native born American blacks.  It is not true of any black Americans who immigrated here from elsewhere.  They are no different than anyone else, no matter where they immigrated from.  In fact, they are just like us, even before they are fully assimilated.  Often, they, too are made to feel somehow ostracized and not welcome among native born black Americans.  One that I worked with before I retired was from the UK, and his clipped, precise and correct English accent and perfect diction immediately and obviously put off native black Americans, who did not want to befriend him.  The minute they heard him speak, they saw him as a white man. 

This is taught behavior; it is not natural.  How else do you explain the over 90% voting record of black America supporting the Party of slavery, secession, Jim Crow, the Klan and segregation; the  Party of Jefferson Davis, Robert E. Lee, "Axe Handle" Lester Madox, Orval Faubus, George Wallace, Bull Connor, the Clintons and Comrade Obama (peace be upon him).  They have been trained, made into government angered, agitated, racist, anti-authority, dependent, spoon-fed, and led by the nose into an entirely new kind of Marxocrat Party-dependent voter slave plantation, and they don't even see it for what it is.  Most of them will vote for Hillary, and, sure enough, if she wins, things will get worse, for them and for everybody.  As usual. 

Black America gets this extra treatment here because it represents the biggest socio-political group in America that has been almost totally subverted into anti-Americanism.  Black America dwarfs similar groups, such as La Raza, the Homo-Nazis and rent-a-mob groups like Occupy Wall Street.  While all of black America will not get out in the streets and riot on command, a whole lot of them will, and a whole lot more of them will be sympathetic to the rioters.  The ultimate goal of the Black Lives Matter rioters may be, besides full-on revolution, to make inner city black neighborhoods into "no-go zones" in emulation of what Islam is doing all over the Western world.  Police-free zones, under the total control of the rioters. 

Government, at all levels up to the White House, may be seen to be cooperating with that effort, and even causing it.  The News Media not only supports the effort, but may be seen to cause it and instigate it, incident after incident, through outright lies of commission and omission, falsely reported as "News".  There is no other real cause for any of these "incidents", or incidental race riots.  The News Media flat out lied in Miami Gardens Florida; they lied in Ferguson Missouri; they lied in Baltimore Maryland; they lied in Milwaukee Wisconsin; they lied in Charlotte North Carolina.  What they said happened did not happen.  They lie everywhere; lying is what they do, and being anti-American is why they do it.  Even after their false news stories are proved false, they never, ever correct their own lies; they just drop the subject, or keep reporting without mentioning the truth behind the story. 

The glaringly obvious pattern is repeated, over and over and over again.  The minute a black person is shot by a cop, here we go again.  It doesn't matter what the black person was doing; it doesn't even matter if he was trying to kill someone.  It doesn't matter what race or color the cop is.  None of the circumstances surrounding the incident matter at all.  Bottom line the actual incident has nothing to do with what is about to happen.  It's just an excuse.  No other type of police incident is hyped this way by the media; only when a black is shot by a cop.  (Which just happens to be a relatively rare incident.)  

The cameras will capture screaming, hyperventilating black rage, of friends and families of the "victim", and breathless reporters will hype the incident for all its worth, for days and days.  Between their horrified facial expressions and sympathy for the black victim will be expressions of hope that the always expected "demonstrations" will be peaceful, this time, unlike every single one of all the others. 

And that media "hope" is, in actuality, a call for another riot.  And they are all riots.  No exceptions.  There are always two groups of participants. 

The first group are all of the most blatantly racist members of the local black community who can always be counted on to get out in the streets on a moment's notice.  If I were a betting man I would bet that the local police already know who the worst of these characters are, because they already have a record, just like about all of the "police victims" of all of the incidents. 

The second group may take a day or so to be bused in from outside the area or even the state; they are the Soros-funded rent-a-mob members of Black Lives Matter and other groups, who will come in for violence, pure and simple. 

It may take another day or so, if they see that it's turning into something worth money, for the professional race-mongers like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton to show up with their entourages and bullhorns and hype things to a fevered pitch.  Their main deal is to blackmail city officials and local businesses for monetary damages, "contributions" to their "funds" and big public apologies to calm things down.  If it were anyone else, it would be seen for what it is, which is, extortion, pure and simple; but it's never seen to be extortion for the professional race baiters.  It's just a lucrative livelihood, for them. 

Permits will be applied for and granted, and everyone will prepare for the supposedly Constitutionally guaranteed right to "demonstrate" in favor of dead cops and emptied prisons.  And, sure enough, they will "demonstrate" calling for dead cops and emptied prisons, and, sure enough, it will become a riot, and sure enough, there will be looting and burning and destruction of property, with police cars being a favored target for destruction.  The outsider participants don't particularly care who is burned out or looted out of business, because they don't live there, and they are out for real revolution, not just another ruined area. They are, after all, paid Machiavellian Agent Provocateurs. 

Again, if I were a betting man, I would bet that the FBI knows who the worst of these outsiders are, because they, too, already have a record. 

And the media will seek out another such incident elsewhere, and compete with each other to be the first to repeat the process.  Just as predictable as sunrise or sunset.  It is, after all, their job; it is what they are trained to do. 

Each one of these "incidents" could be stopped dead in its tracks the very first day.  That was true of all such revolutionary "incidents" that occurred back in the '60s.  But they were not stopped, and that's the problem today.  Each time lawlessness is not punished, more lawlessness is encouraged.  That's just the way it is.  It gets to the point where use of the required force to restore order will mean a whole lot of injuries and deaths, and as lawlessness grows and grows, fewer and fewer are willing to actually forcibly restore order.  The bad guys win. 

As an example of the news media's part in this, think back, if you are old enough, to the Kent State riot.  I remember it, but then, I'm your a-typical really, really old guy.  Younger people who learned about it will think it involved a bunch of National Guardsmen who fired into a peaceful crowd and killed four Kent State students.  And that's it. 

They will not know about all the bricks and bottles and rocks flying through the air.  They will not know about a campus ROTC building going up in flames.  They will not know about the howling rampaging mob in their second day of violence, smashing, pillaging and looting, first in town, then the next day on campus, with Kent State students joining in. 

Younger Americans won't know about any of that. 

That's what the ideologically Marxist media does.  They never correct their lies, even when the irrefutable truth of the matter comes out.  They might give one sentence to the truth, somewhere toward the end of a long article condemning the authorities, and then never mention it again.  Every subsequent mention will be anti-authoritarian, anti-American and pro-Marxist.  Most of the Moron Vote will not read much past the headline anyway, and the headline and leading paragraphs will never involve the truth at the root of the story. 

And that limited, falsified  "News" is what will always stick in the minds of the people.  The more things change, the more they stay the same.  Same driving ideology, different activist group.  Only the lawlessness changes, by marginally increasing, each cycle. 

Face it.  The current sitting federal government is a lawless government.  They are not stupid; they are anti-American.  They know exactly what they are doing, and they are doing it with purpose.  That goes for foreign policy as well as domestic. 

The most decent and dedicated government and law enforcement in America is found today at the lowest levels, not the highest.  The most local government (outside of major big city metropolises, which are almost all dominated by Marxocrat Party politics) are the most lawful, the most safe, the most orderly and the most American. 

And the lawless federal government is working to change that.  The sitting regime welcomes into the White House, blesses and encourages its Agent Provocateur groups like Black Lives Matter, and works to hamstring local law enforcement through the federal Attorney General's office.  Local cops alone are "investigated", given unconstitutional orders regarding re-training with anti-American indoctrination, and threatened with federal fund cut-offs, while the criminal perpetrators of local social mayhem are molly-coddled. 

The Obama Regime and the News Media are one the the same thing. 

So what happens when a new President and/or a new Congress decides to weed Marxism out of the highest levels of government, and return American government to operating very strictly as the Constitution instructs it to operate? 

There will be hell to pay. 

The Good: 

1. Cabinet level officers and heads of agencies who have in any way violated the Constitution in office would be removed from government, at least, if not charged with criminal offenses. 
   
2. Supreme Court Justices and lower court Justices and Judges who have violated the Constitution in office would be impeached from office and/or charged with criminal offenses, beginning with criminal malfeasance in office. 
   
3. Senators and Congressmen who have violated the Constitution in office would be impeached from office and/or charged with criminal offenses, beginning with criminal malfeasance in office. 
   

The Bad: 

1. Some states may have to run special elections to restore state representation in Washington. 
   
2. Senate approval of new judiciary and new top agency candidates may be done by quorum vote of an incomplete Congress, or held back until a quorum was present. 
3. No one in either Establishment Political Party and no one in the whole of the Donor-Owner Ruling Class that gives the Political Parties their marching orders, including especially George Soros, is going to sit still for this.  Chaos, not order, is their very political reason for being.  Politically pretending to quell Chaos while they actually work to build Chaos is what they do. 
   
   Go back to the very first thing recommended herein, at the top of this webpage.  If we don't first break the Parties none of this is going to happen.  Because the unconstitutional Parties, not our Constitution, run the federal government today, and what the Party system says goes. 
   

The Ugly: 

1. The "bottom" Marxist-aligned community organizations may be incited to agitate much or most of the Moron-Vote into the most violent and destructive "peaceful demonstrations" America has seen to date. 
   

---

Breaking Islam:  What happens when the American government wakes up to the simple fact the American citizenry is already painfully aware of, which is that Islam, the religion, is in a self-declared state of war with us, with Israel and with all the rest of the whole non-Islamic world?  What happens when they actually read the Koran and see what the religion of Islam orders its disciples to do to unbelievers, most particularly to Jews and to Christians? 

Our Marxified sitting federal government, their Marxified academia and their Marxified news media are lying to the American people about the "peaceful religion" of Islam.  What they are dishing out to us on the subject of Islam is a long string of serial coordinated lies.  With malice aforethought. 

Their Marxist goal is, of course, Chaos, and Islam presents just another branch of unpredictable Chaos to add to the mix.  Chaos is good, for Marxists; in fact, it is necessary for "fundamental change" and "change you can believe in" and a "fundamental transformation of America". 

Comrade Obama (peace be upon him) knows full well what Islam is all about; he studied it in his childhood.  And now he lies about it.  Every incident of Jihad brings out the flagrant lies.  "That's not Islam", or, "That's a hijacked form of Islam", or, "That's a gross misinterpretation of Islam" or some such blather.  Workplace violence.  One-of-a-kind act of terror.  Domestic terrorism.  ISIS is not Islamic.  Al Queda is not Islamic.  Islam is a religion of peace. 

Right. 

We spoke about this in the Obamunist Deception, the Ruling Class Liars and elsewhere, I'm sure, wherever we described the Islamic doctrine of Taqiyya, which allows Moslems to lie to unbelievers about what they intend, eventually, to do to them. 

Look at Comrade Obama's personally appointed "Czars" and look at his personally appointed "Advisors" and count the Marxists, and count the Moslems, and count the members of known Islamic terrorist groups such as the infamous Moslem Brotherhood, and tell me he doesn't know what he is doing here.  He is no babe in the woods.  The motto of his Moslem Brotherhood national security advisors is: 

and Comrade Obama (peace be upon him) knows it, full well.  That's why he's working overtime to get more Moslems into America, quick, while he can, by both legal and illegal means.  Organizations like the Moslem Brotherhood, ISIS, Al Queda, etc., are the Moslems who are most true to the teaching of Islam.  There is nothing "radical" about them.  Read the Koran if you don't believe me. 

"Conservatives" have been badly fooled on this topic.  They waste time and energy trying to get the President and his Media and his Academics to say the term "Radical Islamic Terrorist", when there is no such thing to begin with.  What they call "Radical Islamic Terrorists" are actually nothing more than Islamic Jihadists, pure and simple. 

External, or "Lesser" Jihad is referenced some 164 times in the Koran.  Internal or Greater Jihad relates to personal conversion; External or Lesser Jihad refers to war against all unbelievers, to bring them into submission to Islam, or kill them.  Striking terror into the hearts of unbelievers is not only allowed, but specifically called for in the Koran.  There is absolutely nothing radical about it. 

As we have said elsewhere herein, all the seemingly peaceful "be nice to the Jews and the Christians" verses originated in Mecca before the flight to Medina.  And all the "death to the Jews and death to the Christians" verses originated later, in Medina.  And whatever Mohammed said last, which contradicted anything he had said earlier, abrogated, nullified and replaced that which came earlier.  This is the doctrine of abrogation.  All the murderous verses stand; all the peaceful verses are abrogated. 

With the rearrangement of Islamic dominated lands through the world wars, the destruction of the old Ottoman Empire, which was the last Caliphate, and the birth of "secular" Islamic governments, beginning with Ataturk in Turkey, Islam settled into semi-civilized nations, mostly run by strong-man led democratic governments. 

When any such strong-man government is toppled, the default government becomes the government of the Koran, which is to say, a return of Islam in some more true to the Koran form.  Which means, the unleashing of Jihad once again.  In the world of Islam, it's either secular government, or it is Islamic government, and if it is Islamic government, that government will sooner or later pursue Jihad against the outside world. 

Comrade Obama (peace be upon him) knows that, and that is why he is bent on toppling certain Islamic strong man governments.  He knows the potential result is Global Jihad.  That's why he is doing it. 

When any "secular" Islamic government falls in any Islamic land, the natural and almost automatic replacement government will be Islam.  And that means Sharia Law as national policy and Jihad as foreign policy.  Every other form of law and government is against the Koran. 

I was wrong in what I said in comments in Limited War Doctrine and in Bush War Revisited.  And, President Bush was wrong, not in pursuing the war, but in seeking to establish a Democracy in place of an Islamic Strong-Man Government.  He likely didn't know it was nearly impossible, and neither did I, and probably most people.  Few of us ever looked closely at Islam at all until after 9/11/2001.  The stage had been set for toppling Saddam by former President Billary Clinton, who established the policy of regime change for Iraq due to Saddam's weapons of mass destruction, as we showed in the Bush Lied, People Died treatment. 

But it was the attempt to establish a Democracy in a predominantly Islamic land that presented the great, perhaps even impossible difficulty.  The people cannot be both Islamic and ready for democracy.  The two things are incompatible.  Yes, liberty and freedom is written on the hearts of men; but the Islamic culture overpowers it, and insists upon the Koran, and only the Koran.  Unless you can convert a whole nation, or a great majority of it, you cannot establish any reasonable form of citizen representative democracy in an Islamic country.  It's either brute-force tyrannical "democracy" or Islamic law.  One or the other. 

Converting a whole country cannot be done easily, perhaps not at all, and certainly not in just a few years or decades. 

Meanwhile, we, and all of Western Civilization, are being successfully attacked by Islam through the new strategy of Civilization Jihad, or Jihad through immigration.  That's not to say that old fashioned Jihad is dead, and no longer operative in the world.  But Immigration Jihad is working well, all over the world. 

Moslems form unassimilated closed enclaves within larger representative democracies or constitutional republics from which to rapidly reproduce into larger and larger enclaves.  All over the host nations, metastasizing as it were, eventually joining borders with other enclaves.  Whenever they feel strong enough in any enclave, they begin keeping non-Moslems out, by force.  They make of themselves "no-go zones" where even the local police dare not go for fear of violent reaction. 

In these stronger Moslem enclaves, Sharia Law rules, and to hell with the law of the host nation.  "Pop Up" Jihad incidents come out of these continually growing and metastasizing Jihadi-sheltering enclaves, even while other outside-the-enclave citizens are recruited into acts of Jihad by the growing Islamic culture. 

These incidents of local Jihad always cause the host country authorities to stupidly investigate and ceaselessly argue about whether or not the perpetrators were ever in contact with any known terrorist group, or acting alone, or "radicalized " or recruited by anyone, or members of some non-Islamic group, such as the Tea Party.  Because, they will all insist, "No one is blaming all of Islam", because, they are all quite certain, "Islam is a religion of peace." 

They are either fools or they are in on it. 

This has got to be stopped, whether all of our politically correct fools and all of our in-the-know traitors like it or not. 

America is not going to survive this sneaky subversive invasion unless and until America recognizes the threat that it is, and takes action against it.  To quote, from Breaking Islam: 

So what happens when a new President and/or a new Congress recognizes the mortal threat Islam poses to domestic tranquility, national security and world peace, takes Islam's 1,400 year old declaration of war against all the non-Islamic world seriously, and acts accordingly? 

And what happens when our supposedly representative government learns what We The People already know, that Islam itself opposes our American foundational Natural Law rights from our Declaration, our civil rights to Equality, Life, Liberty and Property? 

The Good:

In American Domestic Policy toward Islam:

1. Islam, like Marxism, should be formally declared to be a mortal enemy ideology to Constitutional America, as determined by its own writings and declared ideology and theology. 
   
2. All Moslems should be immediately removed from military service, government employment and from any American political office, and Moslems should be forthwith barred from American military service, government employment and holding any American political office. 
   
3. Moslems should be stripped of all American security clearances, and barred from ever attaining any American security clearances.  Moslems should be removed from and barred from employment by any private institution that is working on any government contracts. 
   
4. Moslems should be permanently barred from immigration into America and from application for any form of American visa, and from entry into America under any pretext.   Existing visas and ongoing citizenship processes for Moslems should be invalidated and canceled. 
   
5. Moslems who are American citizens should be stripped of American citizenship and all attendant Constitutional rights, and Moslems should be forever barred from US citizenship. 
   
6. Moslems who do not self-deport should be rounded up for deportation.  If that means temporary internment camps, so be it. 
   
7. Mosques should be destroyed or converted to other uses. 
   
8. Whenever criminal investigation clearly identifies anyone in America as being an Islamic Jihadist, civil authorities should turn them over to military authorities to be tried by military tribunals as enemy spies operating within our borders. 
   
9. Comrade Obama (peace be upon him), and many if not most members of his regime, should be investigated for the possibility of the finding of valid legal charges of treason against Constitutional America. 
   

In American Foreign Policy toward Islam:

1. American military forces should be proactively and aggressively waging war against all Jihadi groups and nations that have openly declared their warlike intentions toward us and our allies, in word and in action.  That includes such groups as ISIS and Boco-Haram, and nations such as Iran.  And that means taking out their identifiable leadership or sitting governments and destroying their air, naval and ground military forces by all means available. 
   
2. The only Islamic nations or forces we should ever ally with should be those opposed to and fighting against Islamic Jihad, for whatever reason and however temporarily.  We should maintain constant vigilance that they, being Islamic, may return to the Koran at some point and become our enemies, and we need to act accordingly. 
   
3. We should especially target for destruction nuclear and other WMD sites and research facilities. 
   
4. If there are Special Operators willing to do it, it might be profitable to do a "Reverse Jihad" covert infiltration and deep penetration of command and control leadership of groups like ISIS, Moslem Brotherhood, etc., with missions of assassination, bombing and mayhem. 
   
5. Once any military mission is accomplished, American forces should leave the area.  There should be no American attempt at nation-building in any Islamic dominated lands. 
   
6. This also means seeking out for destruction the leadership and military forces of such self-declared American mortal enemies as Al Queda, Taliban and Moslem Brotherhood, among others, wherever they may be in the world. 
   
7. Formation of an American military sea-born force dedicated to hunting down and destroying piracy on the high seas, including their land bases of operation.  Making war on piracy means, essentially, making war on a branch of Islam, because probably 90% of all world piracy and human slavery is committed by Moslems. 
   
   Piracy against American ships is what caused America's first war, under President Jefferson, which was fought to end "Tribute" payments to barbarians and to end attacks on American vessels and citizens.  But the piracy and the tribute demands and the human trafficking never ended, except against American vessels and citizens.  What was going on then is going on today, with the same level of utter barbarity.  That's how many in Islam make their money. 
   
8. These things must be done, but we should never fall into the trap of depending on allied forces or waiting on any promised aid from any outside source.  If others will ally with us, that's fine; but we cannot wait on them or depend on them.  When something has to be done, you do it. 
   
9. Islamic nations not expressing open hostility toward us should be left strictly alone, until and unless that situation changes. 
   

The Bad: 

1. In all likelihood, thanks to Marxocrat Party anti-defense policies, we are not militarily prepared to do the "Foreign Policy" items listed above until we have at least begun the process of Repairing Defense.  And we may not be able to begin turning that around until after we have secured the necessary revenue to do it by Breaking Taxation, and cut our most disastrous annual deficit spending by Breaking Regulation.  Only then, with a rebounding economy, a balanced annual budget and a bountiful positive federal revenue cash flow, may we be able to properly rebuild our military to pre-Obama cut-backs, and then some.  Until then, we can only do whatever our military is confident it can do with what they've got to work with. 
   

The Ugly: 

1. Beginning the "Domestic Polcies" listed above may be the thing that rips the false mask off of the militant Islam that the Marxocrat Party has been purposely building up inside our American borders.  We may see Islamic "demonstrations" similar to those already seen in the UK and Europe, and some Soros-funded "community organization" demonstrations already seen here, as graphically illustrated at the bottom of the Democracy-Open-Society webpage. 
   
2. These easily predictable "demonstrations" will most certainly go violent, just as predictably as any un-American Black Lives Matter "demonstration".  Unassimilated Islamic enclaves such as in Dearborn Michigan will not just quietly go along with being broken up and deported as deep cover enemy alien ideologues.  All Alinskyite organized, Soros-funded and Marxocrat supported anti-American groups could rise up at once, presenting a glowing opportunity for a Machiavellian-Marxist crack down "for the good of the people" and a typical dictatorial takeover.  But I don't believe all of these groups together amount to enough to do the job here yet.  If it's going to happen sooner or later by anti-American plan, then it would be better for Constitutional America if it happens sooner than later.  The longer it grows, the harder it will be to eventually excise it all. 
   
3. It is possible that many of our most peaceful American Moslems, on being deported, may decide to just go ahead and use up all of their bombs on the way out the American door. 
   

---

Breaking Voter Fraud:  What happens when a new President and/or a new Congress recognizes the multiple avenues of voter-fraud opened up and exploited by the Marxocrat Party and decides to put a stop to it and return to an absolutely honest federal level election process throughout America? 

The Good: 

1. Legislation would result in all federal elections being held solely and exclusively on Federal Election day, the First Tuesday after the First Monday in November, with no early voting, and no voting outside of election day other than by absentee ballot. 
   
2. Legislation would require a valid picture ID, available from the local BMV, for all voters in all federal level elections. 
   
3. Legislation would result in all American voters registering to vote strictly and solely in their resident voting precincts with a valid picture ID. 
   
4. Legislation would result in all American voters voting in any federal elections being checked in at polling places on election day with a valid picture ID before being allowed to vote. 
   

The Bad: 

1. The Marxocrat Party, the criminal alien population and all others who somehow benefit from supporting voter fraud will resist this with everything they have. 
   

The Ugly: 

1. The new Legislation will be called "racist". 
   Ho hum, heavy sigh and here we go again. 
   

---

Repairing Defense:  What happens when a new President decides to undo all the purposeful damage done to American military fighting capability by all the years of virtually demoralizing and demilitarizing Marxocrat Party policies, and restore our military to pride, honor, strength, training, equipment, awesome power and reach and the full support of their own government?  What happens when all the truly stupid Leftist intellectual grand social experiments and social engineering programs are eliminated from the military, and the military's very purpose for being and sole mission returns to being, very simply, to kill people and break things? 

The Good: 

1. A Serious, Constitutionalist Commander In Chief would immediately order all Moslems to be discharged out of the military as Irreformable Ideological Enemies of our military, and restrict all recruitment of Moslems, and restrict all Moslems from access to military bases. 
   
2. A Constitutionalist Commander In Chief would order all known homosexuals out of the military and institute a "Do Ask, Do Tell" policy to uncover all other homosexuals for immediate discharge.  There is nothing I can think of more destructive of squad level military unit cohesion than a majority of normal non-pervert American fighting men being forced against their will to sleep, shower and live in extremely close company with sodomites. 
   
3. A worthy Commander In Chief would order all women out of all combat roles, off of all ships, aircraft and vehicles that have a combat mission or that even go into or very near combat areas, and out of all military units that have a combat mission or that even go into or very near live combat areas.  He would order an end to all military "co-ed" billeting and living accommodations wherever they may exist.
4. He would order the return of all American military academies to their former role as exclusively male military academies. 
   
5. He would work to establish an exclusively pro-American and pro-Constitution military by weeding out pro-Marxist or other anti-American ideologues from all ranks of military service, and by including the Constitution itself and the Declaration of Independence into early and ongoing military training.   American Fighting Men need to know something about the Supreme Law legal document they are all solemnly sworn to defend against all enemies, foreign and domestic. 
   

The Bad:

1. Every Marxocrat and other anti-American office holder who has not yet been impeached or imprisoned for violating the Constitution in office will resist this with every ounce of energy they have, as will the entire Donor-Owner Ruling Class, and their wholly owned News Media and their Entertainment Industry.
   

The Ugly: 

1. The Ameriphobes, Christaphobes, heterophobes, malephobes, militarphobes and other assorted phobia-trained herd thinkers will come out from under their rocks and show their true colors everywhere. 
   
2. The Marxocrats and all their Alinskyite organizations, including the Femi-Nazis, the Homo-Nazis, the Islamo-Fascists and their Media will label the Commander In Chief a sexist, a homophobe, an Islamophobe and a war-monger.  The feminists will fly into a blue snit, and the homos will have a shrieking, screaming hissy-fit.  But here's the thing:
   There is only one Commander In Chief, and they ain't him. 
   

---

Breaking the UN:  What happens when the American people, and a Constitutionalist President and/or a Constitutionalist Congress wakes up to the fact that all of the unscientific global-dooming frauds infecting human thought are centered in and sponsored by the UN? 

What happens when nations learn that the principle goal of the UN has become the elimination of all sovereign nations with borders? 

What happens when the people of the world finally figure out that the UN is now not only unrepresentative of anyone anywhere, unelected by anyone anywhere, unaccountable to anyone anywhere, but is now seeking to become the sole unelected, unrepresentative, unaccountable and uncontrollable dictatorial power over everyone everywhere? 

It's bad enough, from an American citizen viewpoint, that the two biggest voting blocks in the UN are Marxist and Islamic.  But the UN itself has its own Globalist ambitions, and those ambitions oppose nations with borders.  And, like Globalist Marxism and Globalist Islam, the biggest single stumbling block in front of any Globalist agenda is the continuing existence of a strong, Constitutional, United States of America. 

You need to look back as the history of the world, and how nations came to be, and the history of nations.  Nations with borders are not that old, historically speaking.  The whole history of the world, which is still the living, existing history of today, is a history of rule by brute military force.  That's the way it has always been, that's the way it is today, that's the way it will always be, until the end of time. 

The sole thing protecting American citizens from being dominated and brutalized by alien forces is: 

That's it.  If it wasn't for that, we would all be slaves of someone else, or dead.  That's the way it is.  Very simple; nothing to it. 

Super-simplistic utopian day-dreamers imagine that evil can always be conquered by love and therefore that good people can convert evil people, and to that end, we should eliminate all barriers between good and evil and seek to become one, with everyone. 

Sorry, but that does not work.  Evangelization goes both ways.  Evil evangelizes good just as effectively and often as good evangelizes evil.  Whenever both good and evil are inside the same protected borders of a "good" nation, evil has the advantage.  The original intention of the borders was to keep evil out. 

This is just simple common sense.  As it is with a sovereign nation with borders, so it is with the Body Of Christ.  How, exactly, do you clearly identify a Christian community, and even call it a Christian community, if its population is heavily intermingled with open, public, professed and practicing obstinate unrepentant sinners?  Who is evangelizing whom, within the "all inclusive" community? 

Shouldn't any community be more exclusive, for safety's sake? 

The UN has amply demonstrated its opposition to Christianity, in favor of pure Secularism and Indifference, and even worship of their invented earth goddess Gaia.   In their self-perceived wisdom they seek to get all of mankind on the same religious belief page.  By force if necessary.  But the UN's religion is just for openers. 

Every fraud and hoax of the UN's Globalist agenda is being pushed on the world through formal education infected with Cultural Marxism, which commandeered the world's formal education long ago.  And Cultural Marxist education makes heavy use of Scientism, as it must, since real Science, empiricism, peer review and the Scientific Method prove that every one of these globe-dooming theories is fraudulent. 

Every globe dooming fraud pushed by the Marxocrat Party and their News Media is another lie.  But all of these lies are believed by American school children and the Millennial Generation, because that's what they've been taught and they don't know any better.  Most of them firmly believe that life on earth will end in their lifetimes, because of the sins of their parents and grandparents in doing "unsustainable" and "climate changing" and "toxic waste producing" things all their lives.  How thoughtless of them.  

They all believe that electric cars like the Tesla are roaring success stories, and the wave of the future, if the planet survives at all.  They don't know that Tesla has never made a profit, and cannot possibly make a profit, and has only been sustained by grants and subsidies of US tax dollars, because it is, quite simply, impractical as reliable transportation, and that situation cannot be fixed. 

They all believe that "renewable" energy is the wave of the future, if the planet survives at all, and wind, solar and new battery technology could still save the day.  Again, what they don't know, because it is not reported in mainstream news or in academia, is that no wind or solar energy company has ever turned a profit or been able to stay afloat for very long without being sustained by government grants and subsidies from US tax dollars. 

It's a scam.  Solyndra typifies the working of the scam.  A "sustainable" and "renewable energy" entrepreneur presents a plan to a Marxocrat controlled US government, is given  millions or billions of US tax dollars to create the energy source, plays around for awhile, goes bankrupt because what he claimed cannot be done, and he retires as a very, very rich man, perhaps to do it all again with another "sustainable" and "renewable" plan. 

It happens again and again, and they keep getting away with it.  Wind. Solar.  Super batteries.  Electric cars.  And younger generations do not see the fraud in it, because they listen only to the mainstream media, who are in on it. 

There is no such thing as life threatening "un-sustainability". 

There is no such thing as life threatening "Climate Change". 

There is no such thing as all life ending "toxic waste". 

There is no such thing as a "fossil fuel shortage". 

Oil, coal and gas are not "evil". 

All of these big money-making, national economy-destroying frauds, and more, are "global" problems conjured into being in order to promote, in the minds of men, the "need" for global solutions.  The problems are purported to be "too big" for any nation, or even any group of nations to resolve on their own.  Therefore, the "need" for a global solution, and the "need" for global government.  For the good of the planet. 

The objective of all of the false global-threat lies is to terrify a citizenry into blessing and allowing WBESSWG¹⁷ to come to the rescue, and superimpose itself over national governments, in order to save the glorious planet from evil mankind.

Globalist Comrade Obama (peace be upon him) has told the world that refrigerators are a greater threat to world peace than Islam.  He's a liar. 

Globalist John Kerry has told the world that air conditioners are a greater threat to world peace than Islam.  He, too, is a liar. 

The whole goal is to get the American people to not see the United Nations as a foreign entity, but a perfectly benign "friend" of the planet, with nothing but the best intentions.  But, you see, the UN is indeed a foreign entity. 

The Constitution is either the Supreme Law of the Land, or it is not. 

We cannot allow any foreign entity, including the UN, to superimpose any unrepresentative and unaccountable law over the top of our Constitution, without any accountability to us, whatsoever.  It would mean the end of Constitutional America.  And that's the real intent. 

Eliminating Sovereign America is the necessary first goal of Globalism. 

So what happens when a new Constitutionalist President and/or a new Constitutionalist Congress recognizes the UN as the mortal enemy of the sovereign integrity of Constitutional America that it is? 

The Good:  A new President and/or a new Congress could: 

1. Withdraw membership from the UN and end all US funding of the UN as not being in the national interest of America nor in the best interest of the common good of human kind. 
   
2. Give the UN reasonable notice, perhaps one year, to find other accommodations elsewhere and move all of it's offices and facilities out of America. 
   

The Bad: 

1. Every Globalist, from Soros on down, and every anti-human organization, from Planned Parenthood to Al Gore to the UN itself, will come out from under the woodwork to fight this tooth and tong, because America is almost the sole source of all UN funding.  We are actually paying them to work to destroy us.  And they will all fight like hell to keep that situation going. 
   

The Ugly: 

1. This will mean that New York City and environs will take a serious economic hit, because a significant part of NYC economy depends on all the foreign big shots both living in and visiting NYC, and spending money.  Piled on top of all the massive government unemployment of bureaucrats caused by Breaking Regulation above, the Washington - NYC area could experience a near depression, temporarily.  But NYC and all the rest of the nation, of course, would see an improved economic future, because a major wasteful national budget expenditure would be eliminated, contributing to improved American economic health.    
   

---

Breaking the FED:  What happens when a new President and/or a new Congress and/or the American People wake up to the fact that the Constitutional imperative for the federal government alone, "To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin," has been partially privatized and corrupted by intermingling private savings and investments with US treasure?  That private bankers act as agents of the government while remaining private bankers, to set interest rates, print and coin US money, and more, to their own benefit?  That this Crony-Capitalist granting of government authority to a monopoly of private bankers fulfills one of the 10 pillars of Communism, to whit,

Or when they learn that the FED and other Marxocrats called the phony "emergency" prompting the Bush-bail-out of the banks in the closing days of his Presidency, so that the FED and the Government could then just go ahead and use most of that phony bail-out money for something else? 

You need to look back at real history.  Read through the Economic Catastrophe pages to see how "Progressive" Marxism in our government actually caused, deepened and prolonged the Great Depression, and how all that same Progressive Marxism is destroying our economy today, through our own government, right under our noses. 

The world economy was not about to crash and burn before the infamous Bush Bailout.  All of that was a lie.  It was a trick.  The motive was to enrich some Cronies while doing more harm to the American economy, and give some more public credit and boosted gravitas to incoming President Comrade Obama (peace be upon him). 

And most of the government, both Parties, was in on it. 

The Principles that are violated by the Federal Banking System are that,

1. Private enterprises should not be involved in government decision making, printing and coining of American currency, controlling interest rates, inflation or deflation rates, or anything else mandated to government by the Constitution. 
   
2. Government should not be involved in private credit, private holdings, private investments, or even interest rates, which should be allowed to follow the natural laws of supply and demand, like prices and cost of labor. 
   
3. Government funds and private funds should not be intermingled in banks that are both private and public.  Banks should not even be both private and public. 
   
4. Government should follow principles of Monetarism (Milton Friedman) in which all Treasury does is print new money to match natural population growth, not to exceed perhaps 2.5% to 4% per year, and leave interest rates strictly alone to float with natural free market forces.  Healthy inflation through annual money supply increase should match natural (not unnatural) population increase as closely as possible. 
   
5. The US Treasury Department should essentially be a bank.  There is nothing wrong with Treasury using such existing facilities as Fort Knox. 
   
6. Today, in my opinion, there would be nothing wrong with Treasury commandeering and nationalizing some or all of the Federal Reserve Depositories, and then working to audit and separate out privately owned assets from actuall government treasure.  The only honest way to audit the FED at this point might be to commandeer it first. 
   
7. In fact, the government should nationalize and commandeer all currency printing and coining mint operations.  That is, after all, the Constitutional responsibility of Treasury.  New money should change "Federal Reserve Note" wording to reflect the fact that it is once again "US Currency". 
   

Woodrow Wilson's Federal Reserve Act of 1913 initiated Crony Capitalism with a capital C.  The whole federal reserve system is Cronyism, pure and simple. 

The FED artificially manipulates the money supply and interest rates for the benefit of its owners, whose interest always comes first.  Currently, the FED is involved in repeated programs of "Quantitative Easing", in which it radically increases the "digital" money supply, not by printing more money but by making accounting entries on balance sheets.  It isn't even real money. 

What they do is buy bonds from banks with this "digitized" or vapor money, and they hold the bonds.  But all a bond is is a promise to pay back the purchaser for the price of the bond plus interest.  The interest rate happens, not by coincidence, to be zero. 

So the purchasing banks now hold $X from the FED, and the FED now holds $X worth of bonds from the banks.  Nothing but accounting entries on ledgers.  So what has changed? 

On paper only, the banks have more money available to lend.  But with a stagnant economy and no demand for loans, and with the interest rates at or near zero, nobody borrows any of it. 

The temptation is great for banks to use some of that money to buy their own stock, thereby increasing ownership of their own business and simultaneously causing their own stock value to rise in the market.  It makes them look good on paper, and encourages other opportunistic investors to buy their rising stock. 

The stock market is also artificially going up under this lawless administration because of all the bail-outs.  Big companies have no fear of failure, because they know that the FED will bail them out if they get in financial trouble.  Especially if they may be deemed to be "To Big To Fail".  That seems to be a Marxocrat Party mantra.  The whole American economy is practically in the dumpster, but the stock market is roaring. 

The FED, and the Government, are lying to us when they say that they are implementing controls on the economy to keep inflation under control, or deflation, or catastrophic "To Big To Fail" bankruptcies, or interest rates, or runaway prices, or wage-price spirals, or any other such absolute nonsense.  Much of this nonsense, I believe, is driven less by ignorance and poor economic theory and practice, than by evil intent, aimed at eventual American economic destruction. 

Much of the assets the FED is purchasing from banks with QE vapor-money, besides bonds, is actually Government-originated, "Toxic Paper" known as "Mortgage Backed Securities".  In a roundabout way, they are buying back (and perhaps repackaging and reselling) bad loan paper that originated with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mack "Government Backed" loans to people quite likely to default on payments. 

The Marxocrat Party created these two economic time bombs on purpose, and with malice aforethought.  There is no possible way that either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mack, as originally designed, could ever break even, let alone make a profit.  Like Obamacare, they were designed from the outset to eventually catastrophically fail, allowing unconstitutional federal government to save the day, take over and become the sole provider of all home mortgages.  For the good of the homeowners, of course.  Why, it would be heartless to do otherwise. 

So what happens when a new Congress and a new President repeals Woodrow Wilson's Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and re-institutes Constitutional control of American treasure? 

The Good: 

1. We will find out what is real. 
   
2. Pprinting dollars that say "Official US Currency" rather than "Federal Reserve Note" will begin to restore international faith in the value of our dollar.
   
3. Ending "Quantitative Easing" and vapor-money accounting entry transactions between private banks and American Treasury will add value to all real, actually existing dollars.
   
4. Final accounting of all FED assets and activities may (or may not) reveal the need for criminal action against both FED and Government personnel.  
   

The Bad: 

1. Initial reaction may involve a stock market crash and multiple bank failures.  Banks who remained autonomous free enterprises will not be affected.  Credit Unions should be perfectly safe.  The stock market will straighten itself out in due time, as in all "bubble burst" scenarios.  As in all previous crashes, most investors who do not sell will eventually be all right.  Most of those who sell will lose.  If a company is merely overvalued on the market, but still produces a valuable product or service, that company is still viable, and will survive even a catastrophic drop in stock value, as long as it is still a viable company.  The stock will come back if they just don't fold. 
   
   If you are old enough to remember "Black Monday", October 19, 1987, the worst one-day market drop since the Black Thursday of October 15, 1929, which started the Great Depression, the important thing to remember about it is this:  After Black Monday, the only people who lost money were the people who sold.  The people who did not sell, in the long run, came out OK. 
   
2. Predictions of wild inflation on the ending of Quantitative Easing may be unfounded, since there is no real printed money involved.  The banks simply do not have any real money to back up their accounting sheet entries.  It is much more likely that the banks will default, or at least be in a default situation, if the government calls for payment on the bonds it sold to the banks.  But the government can hardly do that, since the "money" the FED gave the banks for the bonds didn't exist either. 
   
   Stalemate? 
   

The Ugly: 

1. Many in the FED and many in our current lawless government may take action to exacerbate the situation and make it worse, since, obviously, this whole situation was set up with evil intent in the first place. 
   

---

Breaking the Drug Lords:  What happens when a new President and/or a new Congress finally recognizes the fact that drugs are not listed in Article One Section Eight, and does something about it?  If it is not listed in the Constitution among the limited and enumerated powers of federal government, then the federal government has no legitimate authority to address it in legislation, enforcement or adjudication of law. 

Congress should not address drugs in law, bureaucracies should not address drugs in regulation, the President should not address drugs in executive orders, and the Supreme Court should not address drugs in adjudication.  Drugs are "out of scope" for the federal government, pure and simple.  The Constitution says so. 

Repealing federal drug laws would not, in and of itself, make all drugs legal.  Under the rule of subsidiarity, and in accordance with the Tenth Amendment, drugs and drug laws would remain subject to State and lower jurisdictions.  The federal government is simply not Constitutionally authorized to make drugs either legal or illegal.  That's for state and local governments to decide. 

It should be obvious to everyone at this point in history that our extremely costly federal government war on drugs is not winning.  Not even close.  It has simply made common criminals into super rich drug lords, and created a huge, multi-billion if not multi-trillion dollar black market industry, rivaling many if not most national incomes. 

There is no valid Constitutional reason for the DEA (Drug Enforcement Agency) to exist.  The same could be said of the BATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms).  If Alcohol is not illegal, and Tobacco is not illegal, and Firearms are not illegal, then, isn't the BATF, by its very name, nothing more than a bureaucratic anachronism? 

So what happens if a new President and/or a new Congress repeals the Controlled Substance Act of 1970 and all other related federal laws and regulations, or simply declares them null, and gets federal government out of the "drug wars"? 

The Good: 

1. In states and localities where such drugs are not illegal, market forces would induce the pharmaceutical industry to produce such drugs at ever increasingly competitive prices, essentially killing the black market. 
   
2. Addicts, which we have always had and will always have, will be less inclined and less forced by circumstance to resort to crime to support their habits. 
   
3. Drug lords, foreign and domestic, will lose their biggest market, their income and their very purpose for being what they are.  Gangs may break up, or find other things to do. 
   

The Bad: 

1. Felons in prison for past drug crimes will stay in prison, for no new law, and no repeal of any old law, can be retroactive.  If they broke the law as it existed when they broke it, then they must serve the sentence they received when they received it. 
   

The Ugly: 

1. Drug addiction, like alcoholism, is an evil, and always harmful not only to the individual victims, but harmful to the common good of society.  Making drugs legal may induce some to try drugs, because "if it's legal it must be OK".  On the other hand, making it illegal may have induced many to try drugs as "forbidden fruit" temptation.  Who knows?  Was it not the same with Alcohol? 
   
   We had our share of alcoholics before, during and after Prohibition.  I think we all agree that Prohibition didn't work.  Neither is our current Drug War working.  It is a waste of treasure for no discernible return on the investment. 
   
   The Church, not the government, is best equipped to introduce the addict and the alcoholic to the true path to true freedom from any addiction to any sin.  All sin, of all forms, is addictive, and there is only one sure way out of worldly addiction, and the government ain't it. 
   

---

Breaking Globalism:  What happens when We The People wake up to the fact that Globalism is the new Communism under another name, and it's two-Party supported goal is to take Constitutional America out of existence and replace it with Global Governance?  Marxocrats are pushing it, Republicrats are cooperating with it, and "Conservative" pundits are all on-board with it.

And what happens when We The People figure out that now, in this circumstance, at this unique time in our history, only Trump, of all people, can defeat the political tidal-wave movement toward our total national demise? 

I'm not kidding here.  Read Breaking Globalism for the details. 

Our two establishment Parties and their Media are rapidly moving the American government toward its own end, in favor of establishing WBESSWG¹⁷ to save the world from all their invented global catastrophic hoaxes, but especially from mankind and the activities of "advanced" and "privileged" and "first world" mankind.

The entire unbroken political history of the world is a history of ruthless conquest and domination of people by tribes or bands of conquerors.  The whole history of the world, since the fall, is a history of repeated conquest by brute military force.  This history of conquest did not end, but was slowed by the development of "Civilization" and "Civilized" nations with borders. 

Strong civilized nations are the only thing that ever slowed ruthless conquest.  And today, the only thing that keeps ruthless conquest in check is, the existence of a Sovereign Nation with fixed protected borders, and with a military force sufficient to project awesome military power far beyond it's own borders to the mortal peril of any would be foreign enemies, epitomized by the USA. 

Communism, a "Global" political ideology aimed at global conquest through violent "revolution", did not end with the dissolution of the Soviet Union.  It just changed tactics.  It is still an anti-nation, globalist strategy of conquest. 

Gorbachev never stopped being a Communist, and neither did Putin.  Only the "nation" of the Soviet Union ended, not Communism itself. 

The Global Communist movement became even more of a parasitic "revolutionary" movement, infiltrating and getting inside target nations and making them destroy themselves.  Chief among its psychological tricks is to propagandize the evil of "nationalism" in the minds of men, and the desirability of "globalism", and the end of nations.  Thus does Marxism continue to advance evil in the world, even in the bosom of goodness. 

Nations gone over to Marxism, in whatever of the many variations of Marxism that exist, are all doomed to eventual economic failure and national collapse.  The result will be the inevitable return of Ruthless Barbarity at the expense of Human Civilization.  Evil wins. 

Despite the lies of the Left, Global Government is quite impossible, so long as evil exists, and so long as Satan rules this world.  Good cannot unite with evil, without becoming evil.  Satan will not be converted, and Satan will have his souls.  No matter what any peaceful dreamers may dream about it, there are untold millions of evil people in this world who are determinedly, decidedly, obstinately and thus even irredeemably evil. 

That's the way it is.  And that makes Globalism detrimental to good. 

There is little wrong with Nationalism that keeps itself free of any variant of Marxism.  And there is nothing wrong, and everything right, with Nationalism that is also free of Cronyism, again, as epitomized by the American Constitution, and an American nation that actually remained strictly Constitutional.  The proper design is right there; all we have to do is follow it. 

America could be and should be freedom's beacon light for the world.  The plan for becoming that beacon is right under our noses. 

We have said that there is nothing wrong and everything right with American Nationalism and Patriotism, and most particularly with American Nationalism itself.  Our own intellectuals and educated elites disagree.  Who cares?  We stand by our own American Nationalism and Patriotism, and we put it on proud display every chance we get. 

What we need to recognize is the largely unrecognized anti-Americanism of our own SLIMC¹ , which is to say, almost all of those above us and in charge of us and running our government, which today is run almost exclusively outside of and in spite of our Constitution.

We have "conservatives" who will not pledge their allegiance to our flag.  We have "conservatives" who defend the right of anti-Americans to publicly desecrate our flag.  We have "conservative" big-shot commentators who criticize nationalism as fascism, patriotism as jingoism, Christianity as fundamentalism, morality as insensitivity and even personal preferences as racism and exclusivity.  We have millionaire professional athletes who publicly dishonor our nation.  We have Supreme Court Justices who adjudicate in direct opposition to our Constitution.  We have a Congress who legislates in direct opposition to our Constitution.  We have a President who is absolutely and completely Lawless. 

So who are the real bad guys here, between us and them? 

It is increasingly difficult to tell who, among our own elites, is the actual Marxist Revolutionary and who is the Marxist Useful Idiot. 

They use freedom of speech to legally restrict freedom of speech.  They use freedom of religion to legally restrict freedom of religion.  They use freedom of assembly to legally restrict freedom of assembly.  They misapply the American right to be armed to restrict the right to keep and bear arms.  They oppose the American right to Pursuit of Happiness to just take our private property from us.  They used conjured-into-being minority rights to suppress the rights of majorities.  They consistently suppress and repress the rights of white people, Christian people, heterosexual people, male people and chaste and moral people.  They quite literally force Christians to not live Christian lives and not run Christian businesses and not be public in their Christianity. 

Only dissidents and anti-American seditionists are ever granted local permits to legally riot.  I mean demonstrate.  Constitutionalists are not allowed to be, let alone allowed to ever speak, on the college campus.  Supporting the police on the football field is "too controversial" to be allowed, but disrespecting the national anthem is "free speech".  So we see that American institutions as wildly diverse as the University and the NFL grow more and more anti-American and seditionist over time. 

They stand the Constitution on its head.  Everything they do is against the normal, the moral, the natural, the Constitutional.  Examples abound. 

In pursuit of phony "anti-discrimination" they discriminate, but only against the majority.  In pursuit of phony "anti-profiling" they profile, but only against the majority.   Unconstitutional "hate-speech" and "hate-crime" laws are applied not only unequally, but solely and exclusively to the majority.  "Affirmative-Action" and "Equal-Opportunity" laws are blatantly racist against a whole race, ostensibly to "get even" with the anciently committed sins of history, which were not even committed by the ancestors of a whole race, but which were in fact committed by one and only one Political Party, which is today's Marxocrat Party. 

A screaming, flaming faggot with a giant chartreuse Mohawk can go prancing down the middle of Main Street, and if a Constitutionalist so much as raises an eyebrow, he will be publicly condemned for committing a "Micro-Aggression" if not legally charged with a hate crime.  Meanwhile, Christian employees may be forbidden by their employer from saying "Merry Christmas", and students may be expelled from school for saying "God bless you" when someone sneezes. 

All permitted by a guilt-ridden majority made psychologically unsound by all the advances of Cultural Marxism.  Everybody just goes along with it. 

So here we are.  Is everybody happy?  Is anybody happy? 

No.  The more the seditionists get, the angrier they get.  It's palpable. 

As we said in the Breaking Secularism treatment, we will not get back to being an obviously Christian nation until We The People get back to being an obviously Christian people.  And that means not being merely "nominal" Christians, going through the motions, doing only that which is required, but actually living fully Christian lives, full time. 

In a similar manner, we will not break Globalism, or any other form of anti-nationalism, until and unless We The People get back to being an obviously American People.  And that means not being merely "nominal" Americans, going through the motions, doing only that which is required, but actually living fully American lives, full time. 

It means expressing Americanism.  It means being American 24-7 and 365.  Being proudly and un-apologetically American everywhere you go, everything you do, in all company, in all circumstances, and being bold about it, whether anyone around you likes it or not.  And it certainly means voting American.  Learning, loving and passing on the Constitution to younger generations.  Being willing to pay the cost of being boldly American.  There may be social costs, sales costs, monetary costs, employment costs, even legal costs.  What we're talking about here is sacrificial love of country. 

Study America, objectively, as compared to any other nation existing or in history, and then choose your course.  Don't count on any of our Establishment Party system leadership; they are lost.  They have made themselves domestic enemies of the Constitution.  If this doesn't happen from the bottom up, it won't happen at all. 

If you determine that America as founded is worth the sacrifice, whatever form it may take, then join the parade, wave the flag, sing the anthem and be fiercely bold and publicly proud of your nation, Under God. 

So, what happens when a new Constitutionalist President and/or a new Constitutionalist Congress decides to put an end to Global trends and return America to being one single and singularly distinct nation of Christian people organized as a purely Constitutional Republic? 

The Good: 

1. They will break the "Political Correctness" Cultural Marxist subterfuge that is behind most if not all American unconstitutional-ism.  Hate speech, hate crime, "affirmative" racism, "Equal Opportunity" racism, whether established by legislation, regulation, executive action or court case law precedent, will be declared null and void, as direct violations of the Constitution, which is to be returned to being the Supreme Law of the Land. 
   
2. They will similarly declare null and void any and all international treaties that have been made by any previous sitting governments that in any way institute foreign laws or rules of behavior applying to America over and above her Constitution, or that in any way harm the common good, well-being and/or national security of America.  That includes harm to the American national economy, and harm to state and/or citizen economy, safety and security. 
   

The Bad: 

1. We will never get the chance to return to Constitutional America unless and until we overpower and destroy all Marxocrat Party power, at the very least, if not break the whole Political party system that brought America to this precarious point. 
   

The Ugly: 

1. If the Marxocrat Party wins in November, forget it.  It's all over. 
   

---

Even as holiness disintegrates from loss of faith,
America disintegrates from lack of love.
The two things are related.

---

Breaking Abortion:  What happens when a Constitutionalist President and/or a Constitutionalist Congress recognizes the clear and obvious unconstitutionality and thus illegality of the Rove v Wade, Doe v Bolton decisions, and many related cases since them, and then just strikes them all down? 

And how will our government seditionists - I mean office holders - react when the Principle of Constitutionality is set before their faces, and they are forced to defend their invented "Constitutional Right" by using completely outside-the-Constitution arguments? 

All a new President and/or a new Congress has to do is Declare It Null, and be done with it.  Very simple; nothing to it. 

In fact, for any existing law, executive action, regulation or court decision that is on its face unconstitutional, a President does not need the consent of a Congress, and a Congress does not need the signature of a President to declare it null, for the simple reason that it is unconstitutional.  All that is needed is the ability to read. 

The Supreme Court Justices, in their majority, violated their oaths of office to uphold the Constitution, and violated the Constitution itself in their majority decisions on Roe v Wade and Doe v Bolton.  Through these unlawful legal decisions, and their unlawful legal precedents, they established entirely new civil rights that did not previously exist in the Constitution or in natural law. 

They were unlawful, first, because Abortion itself is not listed among the limited and enumerated powers of federal government in Article One Section Eight of the Constitution, and therefore Abortion is out-of-scope for being addressed in federal law.  The Supreme Court, therefore, never even should have heard the cases.  Abortion is strictly a matter of State and lower jurisdictions. 

They were unlawful, second, because they established Supreme Court Level Legal Precedents supporting the "right" to commit abortion, thereby making New Law.  And the Supreme Court is specifically prohibited by the Constitution from making new law, for making new law is the exclusive domain of the Congress, as per Article One Section One.  The only things the Court can legitimately adjudicate is existing legitimate Constitutional law. 

In point of fact, when these unconstitutional decisions were made, they abrogated and nullified legislated, representative law as it stood at the time in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.  In direct violation of the Tenth Amendment.  The Court had no Constitutional authority to do this; in fact, the Court was Constitutionally prohibited from doing it. 

And they knew it.  And they did it anyway.  

Bottom line, speaking strictly Constitutionally, the whole political and legal question hangs on whether whatever is living and growing in the womb of a pregnant woman is a human being or not, and whether it is alive or not. 

1. If it's not a human being, or if it is not alive, then it is not a pregnancy, and there is no need for an abortion.  Case closed. 
   
2. If it is a human being, and if it is alive, then it has Constitutional rights, among them, the right to continue to live, which may not be taken away without due process of law. 
   

Now, the New Biology, like the New Math and the New Everything Else, may claim that it is not human, or, it is not alive, until some point, such as viability or some such subjective thing.  But the DNA says that it is human, from the very first instant of conception.  That's real science talking.  And, if it were not alive, it would not be cell-dividing and growing; so, it must be alive.  

Again, if its alive and its human it has Constitutional rights. 

So real science agrees with simple common sense.  And with nature.  And with God's Law.  As usual. 

To roughly paraphrase something I heard Fr. Pavone of Priests for Life say, any politician who is incapable of discerning the difference between representing the people and killing the people is unworthy of political office, and certainly unworthy of your vote. 

So, what happens after a President or a Congress actually stops all the "counter" legislation, and all the legislation-versus-adjudication political haranguing and public political posturing, and simply strikes these decisions down, for once and for all? 

The Good: 

1. Roe v Wade and Doe v Bolton would be Declared Null, Void and No Law due to clear and obvious unconstitutionality. 
   
2. The Supreme Court Justices who voted to create the new national right to commit abortion would be impeached from office for Criminal Malfeasance in Office. 
   
3. If the Justices were not impeached by Congress, a Constitutionalist President's new Constitutional Attorney General would bring criminal charges against them for Criminal Malfeasance in Office, and remove them from the bench that way.  For they all knowingly, willingly and purposely violated the one very thing they were all solemnly sworn to not violate:  the Constitution. 
   

The Bad: 

1. This would not make abortion illegal; it would only set aside the unconstitutional Court precedents.  Abortion is a matter of state and lower jurisdiction.  The federal government, all three branches, may not Constitutionally make abortion legal, or illegal.  It may not be addressed at the national level. 
   
2. The Pro-Life Movement might be tempted to celebrate, and relax.  But the battle must still go on, at the state and lower levels of government.  Pre-existing state level anti-abortion laws that were stricken down by Roe v Wade and Doe v Bolton will need to be re-legislated.  And the cultural Marxist evil that we see in our federal government also exists and grows, perhaps to a lesser degree, in many or most state governments as well.  The battle must go on.  Evil has increased in our culture at all levels since Roe v Wade and Doe v Bolton.  If anything, the Pro-Life Movement must increase its activism. 
   

The Ugly: 

1. Abortion represents Satan's greatest victory in America.  It will not go down quietly.  If and when these laws are stricken down, America will see true evil, unmasked, come right out in the open to assert itself, in high places and low, and many will drop the pretense of being "good" and decent and civilized.  Near Open War will commence between militant secularism and Christianity in America. 
   
2. The aborting people issue represents only one battle, perhaps the greatest battle, in a larger war for the soul of a nation.  So long as evil exists in the world, we will never achieve total victory, in this life.  The best we can achieve in America is to stave off evil, drive it back into the darkest corners of society, and give ample opportunity for the rise of holiness.   That is to say, to seek the common good. 
   
3. The annual Pro-Life March on Washington should continue, perhaps until the end of time.  Perhaps one day a strictly Constitutionalist President and/or a strictly Constitutionalist Congress and/or a strictly Constitutionalist Supreme Court may join in and march with us, and progress toward cultural and national and even political goodness and decency may begin to be made from the top down, for a change. 
   
4. It's up to us, first. 
   

"If my people who are called by my name humble themselves, and pray and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land." --2 Chronicles 7:14

---

Breaking Homo-Marriage:  What happens after a new Constitutionalist President and/or a new Constitutionalist Congress recognizes the clear and obvious unconstitutionality of the Obergefell v Hodges Supreme Court decision, and simply Declares it Null and Void? 

Lots of people will scream bloody murder, but there will be nothing they can do about it, legally speaking.  A law or a right is either Constitutional, or it is not.  An action by a branch of the federal government is either Constitutional, or it is not.  The Court invented right for homosexuals to marry is unconstitutional on its face, because it violated the Principle of Constitutionality. 

First, neither marriage itself, nor homosexuality itself, are listed among the limited and enumerated Constitutional powers of the federal government, in Article One Section Eight of the Constitution. Therefore, neither marriage itself, nor homosexuality itself, are fit subjects for any of the three branches of government to address at all.  Subsidiarity, and the 9th and 10th Amendments, say that matters outside the scope of the federal government are subject to State and lower government jurisprudence, and private citizen decisions.  Thus Obergefell v Hodges, legitimately, was not even a federal case. 

Second, having violated Constitutional principles in even hearing the case, the Court then violated the principle of Separation of Powers in its decision, by establishing an entirely new "right" and an entirely new "law" by way of establishing a new case-law legal Precedent at the Constitutional level.  New law is the exclusive domain of the Congress, not the Court, as per Article One Section One.  New Law must be legislated into being by a Congress, not Ordered into being by a President, not Regulated into being by an unrepresentative and unaccountable bureaucracy and not Interpreted into being or Decided into being by a Court. 

The Court had no Constitutional authority to do this; in fact, the Court was Constitutionally prohibited from doing it. 

And they knew it.  And they did it anyway. 

Once again, on yet another subject, the Justices who voted to set this unconstitutional precedent violated their very oaths of office to make the decision.  For in this decision, they all knowingly, willingly and purposely violated the one very thing they were all solemnly sworn to not violate:  the Constitution itself.

So, again, what happens when a new President and/or a new Congress decides to put an end to the Court's continuous legislating from the bench and simply declares the homosexual marriage decision to be null, void and no precedent, by simply Declaring It Null? 

The Good: 

1. The related "law" and the related "right" will vanish, at the federal level.  If it was unlegislated and unrepresentative it never should have existed in the first place. 
   
2. The Justices who voted to make homosexual marriage a federal "law" and a federal "right" would be impeached from office for criminal malfeasance in office. 
   
3. If the Congress for any reason failed to impeach these Justices, a new Constitutionalist President would instruct his new Constitutionalist Attorney General and Justice Department to bring criminal charges against them for criminal malfeasance in office and remove them from the bench that way.  For, again, they all knowingly, willingly and purposely violated the one very thing they were all solemnly sworn to not violate:  the Constitution itself.

The Bad: 

1. This would not make homosexuality or marriage legal, or illegal, at the federal level.  Again, subsidiarity and the 9th and 10th Amendments leave such issues to state and lower jurisdictions, and to the citizens.  They are not federal matters. 
   
2. Any preexisting state or lower level laws set aside by the Supreme Court's unconstitutional legal precedent will have to be somehow reestablished or re-legislated back into being. 
   

The Ugly: 

1. If you think you've seen some revolting and disgusting public "demonstrations", you ain't seen nothin' yet. 
   

---

Breaking Secularism:  What happens when a new President and/or a new Congress decides to finally set aside the unconstitutional 1947 Everson case Supreme Court decision, and thereby end, once and for all, Separation of Church and State at the federal level? 

The Everson case decision was so glaringly unconstitutional as to be stupid.  The framers and ratifiers of the Constitution never intended to divorce themselves, or future federal governments, from their religions, or to restrict government from supporting them, or to restrict the American people from living their lives fully in accordance with them.  As President, Thomas Jefferson himself did the very things that the Black decision in Everson said he could not legally do:  he built a Church and supplied a Priest for it using American treasure to do it.  Officially.  As President. 

That decision, described in detail at Separation of Church and State, marked a major turning point in American citizen morality, from Judaeo-Christian moral norms, to the social "Secularism" being advanced in the world by supposedly Enlightened thinking.  I'm sure Justice Black and those Justices who agreed with him thought of themselves as enlightened rather than evil.  Whether they were actually fools or evil is for God to decide; as far as we are concerned today, the decision they made was grossly and obviously unconstitutional. 

In fact, it set the precedent for future unconstitutional Court rulings. 

And, it provided the precedent for unrepresentative, unaccountable and therefore unconstitutional bureaucratic regulations further restricting the free exercise of religion and the exercise of free speech in America.  Chief among these were those anti-Christian regulations emanating from the IRS. 

If you ever wondered why your Pastor was prohibited by law from supporting or opposing a political candidate or a political issue from the pulpit, the IRS is the reason.  If you ever wondered why any so called non-profit or not-for-profit or charitable organization had to get government permission to declare itself into being, and follow certain speech-restricting rules just to stay in being, the IRS is the reason.  Kind of makes you wonder who the hell the government thinks it is. 

There is no legitimate reason for divorcing our religion from our politics. 

The only illegitimate reason is to advance anti-religion politics. 

Now, we could take apart all the individual IRS unconstitutional regulations one by one, but the most effective way to undo this whole IRS mess it to take out the whole IRS and shut it down, as we recommended herein in the Breaking Taxation treatment.  Then, there would be no need to deal with the federal government in being charitable, or being political, or setting up an organization for any purpose whatsoever, and how that organization could speak and act, so long as it remained within the law. 

After all, what business is it of the government how much income your Pastor makes, or who or what political candidates and issues he promotes or demonizes from the pulpit, or what he says in his publications, or who he stumps for on the campaign trail, or how he runs his Parish?  Is he a Constitutionally protected American citizen, or not?  Are not we all? 

So, a Constitutionalist President and/or a Constitutionalist Congress can shut down the IRS and all its religion-restricting and speech-restricting and press-restricting regulations.  That still leaves the unconstitutionally established, federal level, "principle" of Separation of Church and State.  That unlegislated, unrepresentative "principle" has been used quite successfully to steadily and increasingly pry the American citizenry away from their religious moorings. 

After Justice and National Defense, the first priority of good government is to seek the Common Good of the American citizenry.  Promoting, winking-at, allowing or unconstitutionally legalizing blatant immorality is not in the interest of the Common Good. 

Morality drives the living of life; morality drives everything in culture. 

So why in the world would anyone accept the false premise that the "Social Issues", i.e., the Moral issues, should not be considered in making political decisions, and in voting for political candidates?  And if Christian morality is no longer to be the standard by which America judges right from wrong, then, what is that standard to be?  Marxist pure utilitarianism?  Secular Humanism?  Universal Human Rights?  Satanist Evil?  Neutral amorality?  What?  Do the opponents of Christian morality even have a standard at all, and do they even know simple right from wrong? 

Note how they do not present a replacement set of rules.  Guess why. 

Christian morality is the fundamental basis for all of our civil law. 

Politicians and political candidates who declare themselves to be "personally opposed" to, pick one, abortion; homosexual marriage; etc.; but, nevertheless, "cannot impose my morality on others" is a liar, or a fool.  The true situation is exactly the reverse of his lie.  The, pick one, abortion; homosexual marriage; etc.; movement is unconstitutionally imposing its blatant immorality on the whole nation, against its will, without representation and without legislation. 

We do not impose our morality on them.  Rather, they impose their immorality on us, against our will, and against the Constitution. 

Politicians who cannot see this fallacy are too stupid for office.  Those who do see it and still say it are too evil for office. 

It's the same with the "my body, my choice" stupidity.  If someone else's body is involved, it's not your choice.  "Woman's right to choose" is another such fallacy.  Everybody knows that there is one and only one choice involved in that unconstitutional "right", and it is the woman's right to "choose" to abort someone else. 

Can any argument be any more obviously wrong than these? 

Well, maybe.  There's still the condemned "one issue voter" argument.

It doesn't hold water either, because,

1. That "one issue" always involves the sanctity of human life;
2. Anyone who holds life to be sacred is likely to be on the right side of every other issue;
3. Anyone who does not hold life to be sacred is likely to hold nothing at all to be sacred;
4. In the absence of a recognized legal right to life, every other legal civil right is abrogated and therefore nonsensical. 
   

The right to Life is in the American Declaration as one of the four natural law civil rights, the legal protection of which formed the reason for the establishment and constituting of America.  That we would all have equality, meaning, equally applied justice, and the inviolable rights to life, liberty and property.  ("Pursuit of Happiness" is interpreted to be the right to get ahead; to save money, acquire and accumulate wealth, or, properly speaking, Private Property. 

These are solidified in Amendment V in the Constitution, as it clearly states that no person may "... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; ...".  Thus, American citizens have a Constitutional right to Life. 

Again, the four Declared American foundational civil rights are solidified in the Constitution in Amendment XIV, as it clearly states, in Section One, "... nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." 

There we have it, in the Supreme Law of America, which is based on the Natural Law, and which recognizes the Divine Author of Nature. 

It may bee seen that the American Constitution, as written if not as currently enforced, is more "Catholic" than some of America's official Catholic archdioceses.  In the Church, too, it appears that the non-magisterial, or the dissident teachers, either outnumber or out-teach, or talk over the top of the Roman Magisterium itself. 

So what does the Magisterial Church say about Life, speaking as the sole protector of unchanged Revealed Truth down through the ages, and what does Protestantism mostly say about it? 

Doctrine does not change, but doctrine "develops" over time, as doctrine is challenged and defended, researched, studied and more fully understood and carefully articulated. 

Cardinal Ratzinger, who would become Pope Benedict XVI, once offered "non-negotiable" sins that no Catholic could support, by vote or anything else, and remain true to the faith.  They were, of course, sins relating to:

1. Life
2. Marriage
3. Preeminence of a Parental right to educate children. 
   

First, of course, was Life.  Human Life is so important that it is most often broken down into its constituting parts, each of which is held to be a non-negotiable issue. 

As it stands today, forming up the Catholic side of the "one issue voter" argument pertaining to Life, there are five non-negotiable points that no Catholic may ever support, because they are non-negotiable.  And they are,

1. Abortion
2. Euthanasia
3. Embryonic stem cell research
4. Human cloning
5. Homosexual marriage
   

They all pertain to Human Life.  Again, if a politician does not hold Life itself to be of value, there is likely no other issue or topic that he is likely to be on the "true" and moral side of.  He cannot recognize what is true if he cannot recognize God, Who is Truth Personified. 

The five non-negotiables are non-negotiable because the are antithetical to the culture of life; they promote instead a culture of death.  The eventual death of the whole human race.  Personally, I would add Artificial Contraception to the list, because it produces all of the death dealing sexual perversions of a culture of death. 

The non-negotiables, like artificial contraception, have been declared to be intrinsically evil.  Evil in and of their very nature.  Irredeemably evil.  Many other "evils" are not intrinsic evils, and therefore they are arguable, or negotiable.  We can argue with, or not agree with a Pope, for instance, on the evil or war, or the evil of the death penalty.  While war and the death penalty are to be avoided whenever possible, the Church would not deny the right of the state to defend itself from foreign aggression, or to insure the safety of its citizenry from capital crimes.  

Catholics should not be too proud of our unchanged and eternal doctrines, because more than half of America's practicing and regularly attending Catholics don't follow them anyway.  And that probably includes a similar percentage of Catholic clerics.  We have before us, after all, Archbishop Cupich's pro-homosexual archdiocese of Chicago, and Card. Dolan's pro-homosexual archdiocese of New York, and Card. Wuerl's pro-scandalously-sinful-politician archdiocese of Washington DC.  And more, I'm sure. 

With Catholic teachers like that, is it any wonder the Church in America has lost over 50% of its flock since the 1960s?  We can see that Bishops, too, just go along to get along.  When there is no difference between Catholic moral teaching and any other "moral" teaching, why should anyone remain or become Catholic?  Our Bishops, for the most part, do not even want to compete with the larger culture.  They act like whipped dogs.  Culture drives them.  They bow before politics.  Some of them participate in politics, on the wrong side. 

There is one more dangerously wrong but good sounding argument against Christian morality out there, and it is the argument that demonizes ideology, in and of itself.  Any ideology.  An "ideologue" is held to be a bad person.  Too rigid.  Everyone is supposed to just flow with the cultural breeze and go with the cultural current, and not be stuck in some archaic ideology that holds culture back from "progress". 

I submit that the opposite is true.  If someone does not have a well thought out personal ideology, then they cannot be responsible adults, let alone responsible citizens of a free Constitutional Republic.  Whether an ideology is good or bad depends entirely upon the ideology itself, but to not hold one at all is to be incompetent as an adult. 

While I never took any  highfalutin philosophy courses, I have read widely, and I have read the Catechism, and the Constitution, and formed an ideology - a guide for the living of my religious, political and cultural life.  It is described toward the top of the Ideologies page.  I'm telling you, if a sufficient number of us do not hold and strongly support a pro-Christian, pro-American, pro-Constitution ideology, America is not going to get out of this ever deepening Obamunist-Marxocrat Party mess.  For they do indeed have an ideology, an evil one, and they stick to it. 

That's why they keep winning. 

How do you adopt, adapt or develop an ideology for yourself that seeks to please God, and to live in this world, both, simultaneously? You begin by thinking about it. 

Read the Sidebar relationship between Religion and Politics.
Read the Sidebar on American Constitutionalism.
Read the Sidebar on Nationalism versus Globalism.
Read the Sidebar on Marxist Ideology.
Read the Sidebar on Islamic Ideology.

Just as a beginning point. 

The best authors I can recommend are Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.  The best religious library I can recommend is the whole Bible.  For Catholics, you need the Catechism of the Catholic Church.  For everyone, you need the Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution, in its entirety. 

As a Christian, and as a citizen, you need to know what you are fighting for before you begin to fight.  And you need to know who your enemy is, or you will not win. 

Begin with this:  Evil exists.  Ideologies that intend our harm exist. 

It is your duty as a Christian to counter evil. 

It is your duty as an American to counter evil ideologies. 

If it wasn't for the 1947 Everson case Supreme Court decision, written by Justice Black, America never would have sunk to this lowly situation of just plain, un-resisted, culture-rot, where Cultural Marxism has been allowed to successfully infect academia, education (including Catholic education), science, journalism and now a vast segment of the voting population.  

So what happens when a new President and/or a new Congress decides to get back to basics and strike down the evil "principle" of Separation of Church and State, and begin returning America to Christian-based morality as opposed to secular immorality and amorality in civil law and in civil rights? 

The Good: 

1. A new President and/or a new Congress could simply strike down the unconstitutional 1947 Everson legal precedent by simply Declaring it Null. 
   

The Bad: 

1. It will do no good unless Christians of all confessions begin to act like Christians.  Today, at this point, that's a tall order. 
   
2. If you call yourself a Catholic, and if you are true to your Catholic faith, then you are called by your faith to stand up and be publicly Catholic, everywhere you go, everything you do, in all circumstances and in all company.  Live your life and lead your family with the Catechism in one hand and the Constitution in the other.  Build the "Domestic Church" in your home, and Join the Resistance.  Don't wait for your Pastor or your Bishop, if you think they may be part of the problem. 
   
3. If you call yourself Christian, of whatever denomination, and you are true to your faith, then you are called by your faith to be identifiably and unmistakably Christian, in how you live your life and raise your family and grow your Church.  So Be a Christian, everywhere you go, everything you do, in all circumstances and in all company, 24/7 and 365. 
   
4. We don't need an overwhelming majority of true believers to turn America around, but we do need an absolutely committed minority sufficient to carry the fight to the enemy if the Marxocrat Party is defeated in November.  Once the civil law begins to reflect common Christian morality, there will begin to be a turning point in the whole culture toward the good. 
   

The Ugly: 

1. If the Marxocrats prevail again in November, it's all over.  Cultural Marxism will have won what the Soviet Union could not win.  America will be destroyed from the inside. 
   

---

Breaking Gun Control:  In the closing lines of that linked page we summed up all that America needs to restore herself to her former strength and greatness:

Very simple; nothing to it. 

The reason that is true is that our sitting government is lawless.  Virtually owned by Cultural Marxism, it is in a Crony-relationship with the News Media, Academia and even the Scientific Community, all of which are also virtually owned by Cultural Marxism.  They are all one and the same thing, forming a quasi criminal enterprise.  They all live and grow by the lie.  Big, bold, public lies.  They feed and grow each other with lies. 

All that our unconstitutional gun control laws ever accomplished in America was to take guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens and leave law breakers free to arm to the teeth.  Even the first 1930s laws controlling fully automatic machine guns only took them out of the hands of those who were naturally inclined to obey all other laws, too.  Al Capone and his gang, and others like them, didn't turn in their fully automatic sub-machine guns; only the non-criminal element in America did that.  Leaving themselves unarmed and defenseless against armed brigands, highwaymen and robbers. 

And against their own ever increasingly lawless government. 

And today, we stand largely unarmed against Islamic Jihadists that our lawless government is working overtime to bring in among us, as one more element contributing to government induced general cultural disharmony and chaos.  Note well that Islamic Jihadist don't respect or obey our laws, only theirs. 

Anti-gun nuts argue that "open ownership" would result in armed gangs and armed bands roving the country.  That's a lie, of course; we have that now.  That's what gun control brought us.  Criminals don't disarm; only the law abiding disarm.  And that appears to be the real intent and goal of gun control. 

The biggest single thing that would bring safety to the public against robbery and gang crime is an armed citizenry. 

The biggest single thing that would protect private property from Black Lives Matter type government organized riots would be an armed citizenry. 

The biggest single factor in reducing death and destruction within our own borders by acts of Islamic Jihad would be an armed American citizenry. 

Nothing any level of government could ever do would do more toward restoring peace and safety to the citizenry than to arm the American citizenry. 

So what happens when a new Constitutionalist President and/or a new Constitutionalist Congress just steps up, with Constitution in hand, and begins striking down Unconstitutional gun control laws, regulations, executive orders and court established legal precedents? 

The Good: 

1. Every gun control law, regulation, edict or precedent in the nation would be nullified and struck down by a simple Declaration of Nullity.  If it violates the Constitution, its illegal.  Very simple; nothing to it.  The Constitutional right of the people to keep and bear arms is inviolate.  Either the Constitution rules, or it does not. 
   
2. All federal gun registration files would be ordered to be destroyed.  It is none of the government's business who owns guns. 
   
3. BATF would be shut down, since alcohol, tobacco and firearms are all quite legal in America.  The best and most valuable human assets and all physical assets in BATF would be absorbed into the FBI. 
   
4. A new Constitutionalist Justice Department would proactively prosecute state and local authorities and courts that in any way act to restrict any citizen his Constitutional rights under the Second Amendment.
   

The Bad: 

1. Any Marxocrat Party members of Congress still not impeached from office over their Obamacare Constitutional violations will squeal like stuck pigs.  Their whole pro-gun control argument is that gun availability causes crime, while the exact opposite is true.  And they know it.  That's why they perpetuate the lie. 
   

The Ugly: 

1. Again, if the Marxocrats win again in November, it's all over.  None of this will ever happen.  This election is our last shot. 
   

---

Breaking Chaos:  What happens when a Constitutionalist President and/or a Constitutionalist Congress decides to restore respect for Truth in government, and to encourage Truth in education, science, journalism, entertainment and all other areas of human endeavor, in so much as government can Constitutionally encourage such things in private enterprises? 

The Good: 

1. Government itself would return to using the Scientific Method and old fashioned empiricism in all All government entities, programs and contracts.  All government entities, programs and contracts not based on true science would be shut down or terminated. 
   
2. Government would identify and oppose all policy, culture and form-of-government affecting falsehoods promoted by Scientism, or by any mere democratic "consensus" of thinkers. 
   
   Especially targeted for opposition would be all the false Globalist theories promoted by the Eco-Nazi Movement, the false Population Problem and all the truly stupid "un-sustainability" educational and journalistic frauds.   And at the top of that giant list of planet-dooming, purely political false scenarios would be the Climate Change Globalist hoax, designed and intended to frighten populations into either Global Government, or idiotic dreams of colonizing Mars, or both. 
   
3. Government itself would openly challenge the lie that "Islam is a religion of peace" and clearly identify Islam as the mortal enemy to human civilization that it truly is. 
   
4. Government itself would identify Cultural Marxism for what it is, and how it operates in government and in the private sector to take America down.  Including the outright "Progressive Socialism" of the Marxocrat Party.  Including the "Bipartisan, Go Along To Get Along" Marxism of the Republicrat party.  Including the "Revolutionary Marxism" of the Obamas and the Clintons.  And especially including the Cultural Marxism in academia, formal education, journalism and entertainment.  It will take a Constitutionalist government and the people acting together to properly oppose these ideological enemies and take them out. 
   

The Bad: 

1. Unconstitutional and lawless government, academia, scientism, education establishment, journalism, entertainment, Jihadists, Globalists and Alinskyites everywhere will unite with the Moron Vote to oppose this with everything they've got. 
   
2. Jihadists, in particular, will ever more strenuously press the public lie that Islam is peace, even as they sharpen their knives, build their bombs, increase their population, build up the Ummah and take more territory. 
   

The Ugly: 

1. Again, if we lose this next election, the game is up, and we have lost America. 
   

---

Breaking Faux Civil Rights:  What happens when a new Constitutionalist President and/or a new Constitutionalist Congress recognizes the fact that fraudulent and unconstitutional "civil rights" have been conjured into being to trump legitimate, legal and Constitutional civil rights? 

Where, either in the Natural Law or in the Constitution, do we find any "right" for a man to declare himself to not be a man, or a woman's right to simply declare herself to not be a woman, and an attendant responsibility or duty for the rest of us to just accept any such personal declaration? 

Where, either in the Natural Law or in the Constitution, do we find any "civil rights" for blacks, Hispanics, sexual perverts or any other minority over and above the civil rights of anyone else, in any area of life? 

In accordance with Subsidiarity, and in accordance with Amendment X, states and lower jurisdictions may recognize such rights, but no one - not any lower jurisdictions, not any states, not any courts, not any US Congress, US President or US Supreme Court, may legally and Constitutionally establish any such new civil right Nation Wide other than by Constitutional Amendment. 

Again, if it ain't in Article One Section Eight, and there has been no Constitutional Amendment to put it there, it is not a nation-wide Constitutional Right.  Whoever "established" it by whatever means did so illegally and unconstitutionally, and it is subject to being simply declared null and void, on that basis alone.  That includes the Supreme Court, any lower court, any regulating bureaucracy, the President and the Congress. 

The same can be said for "special" rights for some that violate equal rights for all.  The same can be said for any "rights" that, in and of themselves, violate any part of the Constitution.  For example,

1. Freedom of Religion does not grant a right to a religion such as Islam whose central doctrine and driving purpose for being is the elimination of Freedom of Religion itself.  If it seeks to make itself the sole religion on earth by force, common sense indicates that it cannot enjoy the protection of Freedom of Religion in Constitutional America. 
   
2. Likewise, Freedom of Religion does not grant a right to an ideology or political movement such as Marxism whose agenda includes the elimination of all religion on earth by force of law.  The false title of "Freedom from Religion" seeks to eliminate Freedom of Religion in direct violation of the Constitution.  The Constitution is not a suicide pact. 
   
3. Any other religion, ideology or political movement that seeks to eliminate, replace or dominate any actual existing Constitutional right is not and cannot be protected by the very Constitution it seeks to violate. 
   

MLK's correctly Christian and correctly Constitutional activism brought black America into proper Constitutional equal rights and equal justice in all areas of America, but especially in those geographic areas under the political control of the segregationist Marxocrat Party.  Blacks gained no "new" rights then; they simply gained correct legal application of the civil rights already due to them through their and our Constitution, in spite of Marxocrat Party political, legal and terrorist opposition. 

But what about all these other "rights" that just keep multiplying? 

Artificial Contraception, viewed as a legal "right", nationwide: 

1. Certainly not in the Constitution or any Amendment. 
   
2. May be made legal or illegal in state or lower jurisdictions, but may not even be addressed by federal government short of a new Constitutional Amendment. 
   
3. Seen by some to be so important that government (meaning tax payers) should provide it for all users. 
   
   (Sandra Fluke testified before Congress that she couldn't afford the $3,000 a year she desperately needed for contraception alone.  Which indicated her "need" to fornicate hundreds of times a day, 365 days a year, at the going cost of any available artificial contraception at the time.  It's a wonder she had time to testify.)
   
   Government funded or mandated contraception is unconstitutional on its face. 
   

Being homosexual and free from any discrimination, simultaneously.

1. Certainly not in the Constitution or any Amendment.
2. May be made legal or illegal in state or lower jurisdictions, but may not even be addressed by federal government short of a new Constitutional Amendment.
3. Unconstitutionally forces moral society into the company of homosexuals against their will.  Any federal law, edict, regulation, court decision, etc., that forcibly disallows employers, schools, Churches, organizations or citizens to make their own decisions, i.e., to discriminate in their own moral associations is unconstitutional on its face. 
   

Declaring a self-defining imaginary "Gender" and using opposite sex restroom facilities. 

1. Certainly not in the Constitution or any Amendment.
2. May be made legal or illegal in state or lower jurisdictions, but may not even be addressed by federal government short of a Constitutional Amendment. 
   
3. Federal government funded or mandated or ordered or supported variable-gender nonsense is unconstitutional on its face. 
   

I think you can see the pattern here.  Every time a court, or a bureaucracy, or a Presidential Edict calls all of America to recognize some new "right" that is clearly out-of-scope, so-called Conservatives in Congress and the Press conjure up all sorts of countering bills or hearings or actions to undo it or oppose it, in a flurry of strictly defensive-mode activity, but none of them ever recognize that the whole subject is way outside of all of their legal jurisdiction in the first place. 

That's what happens after multiple generations of studiously ignoring the Constitution that gives them their full operating instructions. 

We are not operating under the Constitution that restricts our government and protects our rights. 

Every bit of this nonsense is publicly and politically hyped to be aimed at "bringing us all together" when in fact it is aimed at the exact opposite of solidarity.  The whole intent is to create, splinter, antagonize, agitate and factionalize ever increasingly hostile opposing groups while legally forcing them all into close company with each other against their will.  The real goal is Chaos. 

So what happens when a new President and/or a new Congress decides to reestablish the Constitution to its rightful place as the Supreme Law of the Land, and begins to dismantle all of the existing extraneous, unconstitutional nonsense and get back to basics? 

The Good: 

1. Every one of these bogus and unconstitutional federal "rights" can be simply Declared Null and shut down.  Budda-bing, budda-bang buda-boom; no muss, no fuss, over and done with. 
   
2. Whoever established it at the federal level may be impeached from office and/or indicted by the Justice Department for criminal malfeasance in office, in the violation of the Constitution and violation of the Oath of Office. 
   

The Bad: 

1. This is never going to happen without a Constitutionalist President. 
   

The Ugly: 

1. If the Marxocrat Party wins, you ain't seen nothin' yet.  OWS will likely gain the right to go ahead and kill cops. 
   

---

Breaking Heterodoxy:  The Catholic Church, as the sole keeper of original unchanged Christian doctrine, is the logical basis to which the larger Christian world turns for the "basics".  When questions arise over proper meaning and interpretation, the whole Christian world turns toward Augustine, Aquinas, the early Church Fathers, and even the Popes.  Whether they like it or not, if they want to study Christianity, they have to study Catholicism, or at least what the most important historical Catholic figures wrote.  Sooner or later, all denominations looking into Scripture history or doctrine history or Christian theology wind up studying the vast literature of the original Church that received the Revelation and authored the Bible in the first place, and unavoidably so.  You can't get away from it. 

"General Christianity" provided the moral basis for the founding and constituting of the USA, and the basis for all American civil law.  So our whole national moral foundation is built upon the immutable Christian moral law.  If that moral law is truly immutable, does it not stand to reason that the Church everyone looks to for final verification of moral law should itself be unchanging and unvarying in its moral teaching?  Should it not speak with one and only one moral voice? 

Well maybe it does, but if it does, that voice is not heard in America. 

We have spoken, some think too much, about how Western thought has been purposely disinformed, with evil intent, through the sly infiltration of Cultural Marxism.  Almost no one sees the accelerating moral decline in all of Western Culture as caused by an evil hidden political plan, but that is precisely what it is.  And it isn't merely being promoted to newer generations through Marxist-ideology dominated secular education. 

Catholic education is infected by it too.  Perhaps more. 

The evidence is heavy.  Look through the Heterodox Catholicism pages, the Cafeteria Catholicism pages, and the Papal Imperfections pages, and note how Communism, once roundly condemned by one and all Churchmen, is now not so hotly condemned all over the Church.  Not even mentioned in Vatican II documents.  Marxism has truly affected Catholic "Social Justice" teaching, to the point of hierarchical blessing of new "rights" that do not exist in the Natural Law, pertaining more to material equality and social equality than to equality in access to true justice and equality in human dignity.  To the point that some Bishops would even approve of state forced material and/or social sameness.  

It isn't just all the infamous Liturgical Wars that are dividing Catholics all over the world, although that, too, is a major factor in the breakup of the One Holy Apostolic Church.  Now, no two Catholic Churches are the same.  We almost may as well be Protestant.  Catholics now "shop" for Parishes that fit their preferences, just as Protestants "shop" for interpretations and even denominations. 

We have no choice.  We are no longer one Church. 

But American Catholicism's problems are deeper even than that; the deeper problem involves the adoption or adaptation of Marxist ideology into Catholic "theology".  Just as Marxism is no longer recognized as a mortal enemy to the American Constitution, Marxism seems to no longer be recognized as a mortal enemy to Christianity. It's just another, perhaps superior, form of "Social Justice".   

All of which explains how so many ordained Catholic clerics will always vote the Marxocrat Party ticket, even despite the Marxocrat Party Platform championing every single existing form of Church-defined non-negotiable intrinsic evil. 

And it explains why we have so many "Catholic" Parishes flying the rainbow flag of sodomy with the full blessing of their Bishops.  And it explains why ranking "Catholic" clerics and theologians are teaching us all about how we can have a "reasonable hope" that there is nobody in hell, and that nobody is ever going to hell. 

It's I'm OK, you're OK Catholicism. 

I have heard Catholic clerics on Catholic radio recommending bringing active homosexuals and other similar practicing unrepentant sinners to Mass, and welcoming them into the Parish community, in spite of 2 Thes 3:14, Rom 16:17, 2 Tim 3:5, Matt 18:17, etc.  If everyone is welcomed into full participation in the Christian community, then, what has the very definition of the Christian community become?  How, exactly, do you define it?  How, exactly, is it any different than any other community? 

Is there still actually any such a thing as a Christian community? 

I've even heard advice from talk radio Catholic clerics responding to family member and close friend questions regarding attending homosexual marriages and receptions, with the now seemingly standard answer, Mass, no, but the wedding reception, yes.  Because "we don't want to shun our close friends or relatives". 

Why not? 

The argument that we still have a chance of converting them if we are still in close contact is countered by the argument that they still have a chance of converting us if we are still in close contact.  It goes two ways.  You become who you associate with. 

Say you attend the homosexual reception of a close friend or relative.  Do you follow all the old traditions?  Do you clink your fork against your glass to encourage another public homosexual kiss?  Do you stand in line to take your turn dancing with the bride to put money in his hand?  Do you talk to the little children present about how one day they, too, may be homosexual brides and grooms? 

No?  Why not?  Are you some kind of homophobe? 

The American citizenry is not going to fully return to Christian morality without a serious conversion or re-conversion back to at least the basics of foundational Christian faith.  Greater America really needs a strong One Voice Catholicism to look to for the anchor, or the fundamental roots of Christian faith.  And that just ain't here. 

Our only path today is one of geographic dioceses and archdioceses here and there that fiercely stand up for orthodoxy and magisterial teaching, no holds barred.  If some of them will start it, perhaps others will follow, however meekly.  But if we just keep doing what we're doing, both the Church in America and America herself are cruising straight into complete disintegration. 

The Church is supposed to be leading the moral way, but the Church just ain't doing it. 

It's now gone so far that it can all come apart within one year. 

The Good: 

1. I see no good way out of this, since laymen alone cannot correct the path of the Church. 
   

The Bad: 

1. It's all bad.  Everybody is talking about evangelizing the baptized, or the "sacramentalized but not evangelized" or, more correctly, not properly catechized Catholics.  Which is the fault of the Bishops.  Fallen away or not properly catechized Catholics are the targets of the New Evangelization, but who needs to be evangelized most may be most of our Bishops. 
   
   If we Catholics can't get our act together, how are we to reassure and encourage our separated brothers when they are on the right path? 
   

The Ugly: 

1. It's all ugly.  If the Bishops and the Pope don't do it, it won't get done.  Make your goal the next foxhole. 
   

---

Breaking the Establishment Club:  What happens when a new Constitutionalist President or a new Constitutionalist Congress decides to forcibly reverse the unconstitutional course of the whole government, and especially break the unconstitutional dictatorial Court power over the other two branches of government? 

Or, what happens when a not-so-Constitutionalist new President, such as Donald Trump, decides to fire back at the whole Establishment Club that owns the Parties, and that has been doing everything in its power to destroy him? 

What happens when, as President, he discovers the power of the Constitution as a weapon with which to cut off all of their money and destroy all of their power? 

And what happens when he discovers that he doesn't necessarily need to make any big, complicated "deals" to make America great again; that if he just gets Big Government out of the way, America will make herself great again, almost automatically.  And almost immediately.  And that in so doing, he would go down in history as among the greatest of Presidents, if not the greatest. 

The strategic steps leading to the destruction of The Club are all present in the sections of this webpage, and in the Return to Constitutional America pages, which are linked to in the right column of this page. 

Destroying The Club should be easy for a big deal making tycoon like The Donald.  If he put his mind to it and decided to do it, budda-bing, budda-bang, budda-boom, America would be a Constitutional Republic again, in maybe just a couple of years. 

Lots of super rich people wouldn't be so rich, and many of them might even be in jail.  Lots of powerful organization won't have so much power, and many of them might be out of business. 

Ordinary citizens would go back to just going into business for themselves without saying a word to the government, charities likewise, and big international companies would be competing with each other to get our permission to locate or relocate here. 

What if he won, and he actually decided to do it? 

The Good: 

Regarding Income Tax, FICA Tax, Corporate Tax, etc.:

1. The first year, almost the first minute the Fair Tax was Fast-Tracked into operation, as described above in Breaking Taxation, the whole damned 70,000 + page tax code would go out the window, and the hidden, corrupt, gigantic money-flow between the Crony Capitalists and their wholly-owned politicians would be irreparable broken. 
   
2. Every paid employee and every company, both, would get an immediate significant pay raise, with the elimination of withholding tax and payroll tax and corporate tax and capital gains tax and every other form of federal tax. 
   
3. The entire government, and Social Security, would be funded, with nothing deducted from anyone's paychecks, and every American citizen would begin receiving monthly federal government Fair Tax Prebate payments. 
   
4. The resulting national economic boom, in and of itself, might generate enough Fair Tax revenue to balance the budget and end annual deficit spending.  And that national economic boom would continue to grow for some number of years.  It might dwarf the Kennedy boom and the Reagan boom combined. 
   
5. The Crony-relationship between sitting politicians and Crony Capitalists would be unfunded. 
   

Regarding the elimination of unconstitutional bureaucracies:

1. Unconstitutional "regulations" would disappear with the agencies that issued and enforced them, and individuals, farms, ranches and businesses would go back to living their lives as they did long before these overbearing agencies ever existed. 
   
2. The very first gigantic bureaucracy to be eliminated from the budget, combined with institution of the Fair Tax, would result in the ending of annual deficit spending, and would produce our first annual surplus.  Each bureaucracy cut would result in a bigger annual national budget surplus. 
   
3. The crony-relationship between heads of agencies, big-shot bureaucrats, government regulating authorities, etc., and Crony Capitalists would be unfunded. 
   

The Bad: 

1. The Washington "Beltway", the whole so-called Washington-Boson-New york Corridor, and in fact, perhaps most of the whole Liberal North East, would experience an economic recession if not depression, even as the rest of the nation experienced an unprecedented economic boom.  Millions of formerly high-payed government employees would become unemployed, perhaps chronically unemployed, and they all live, commute and spend their money in that geographic area.  The whole area depends upon them for economic health. 
   

The Ugly: 

1. The Obamunists, the Clintonistas, the Marxocrats and the Global Grand Conspirators will not just stand idly by and let all this happen.  Such things as initiating economic calamity and/or violent revolution and/or assassination are not beyond them.  They are, after all, evil. 
   

---

In Summation:

American blindness to the threat is my major concern.  It all looks like business as usual to so many.  Even so-called conservative big shots who are not necessarily favoring big-government or Cronyism or any part of Marxism do not see this election as potentially a particularly cataclysmic event.  It's just another election, to them; they think there will be others.  So they will sit it out, seeing no good candidate, and next time, they think, the voters will have learned their lesson. 

We've been down this road too many times.  There will be no next time.  This could very well be America's very last semi-valid election. 

And the American people, for the most part, don't know about the real and present threats posed by the new variants of Marxism and Islam that are not only present here, but interwoven into the very fabric of American society.  Cultural Marxism, and Civilization Jihad, both, are right here, right now, and not only not recognized as threats, but welcomed among us.  Invited. 

I can't get this off of my mind.  I started writing this way back on September 13, and just finishing it now, October 9.  With only a couple of hours available per day to work on it, it took this long; however, the threats to civilization are so great that they wake me up at 4:00 AM to put some more words down, before I have to go to work.  Continually waffling between despair and hope for the future, the anxiety grows as the election approaches.  I sense that The Donald will win, but who knows what further Marxocrat Party cheating may occur. 

The people need to know:  The Threat Is Real. 

America must win, which means, the Marxocrat Party must lose. 

May God lead us back to critical thinking and simple common sense. 

=====

Sarcastic Acronym Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" it over a link without clicking just to see the simple acronym interpretation. Click any footnote link to see the acronym and a detailed explanation; "Hover" the mouse over it just to see the simple interpretation.)

SLIMC¹ Secularist Liberal Intellectual Media Complex
GESGOEAEOT² Gradually, Ever So Gradually, Over Eons And Eons Of Time
PEWAG³ Punctuated Equilibrium's Wild-Assed Guess
TTRSTF⁴ Them There Real Scientifical-Type Fellers
TTRSPTF⁵ Them There Real Smart Perfesser-Type Fellers
TTRSJTF⁶ Them There Real Smart Journalistical-Type Fellers
SNRTACBT⁷ Surely No Right Thinking Adult Could Believe Today
STNSEACPB⁸ Surely Today No Serious Educated Adult Could Possibly Believe
WDN⁹ We Don't Know
BMDFP¹⁰ Baboons, Mongrel Dogs, Filthy Pigs and ...
HBAACOTE¹¹ Human Beings Are A Cancer On The Earth
ACLU¹² Anti-Christian Litigation Union
FLORMPORIF¹³ Flagrant Liar, Or, Mindless Parrot, Or, Innocent Fool
MEJTML¹⁴ Marxist Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar
IEJTML¹⁵ Islamic Ends-Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar
MPAV¹⁶ Marxist Principles And Values
WBESSWG¹⁷ Wise, Benign, Elite, Super-Scientific World Governance
TRMITM¹⁸ The Reason Man's In This Mess
IYI¹⁹ Intellectual Yet Idiotic
TTRSCBTF²⁰ Them There Real Smart Catholic Bishop Type Fellers
IACMPVND²¹ Illegal-Alien-Criminal Marxocrat-Party-Voting Nation-Destroyers
PEJTML²² Palestinian Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar
PSYOP²³ "Psychological Operation" Mind Trick
CDC²⁴ Covid Developmentally Challenged
LGBTQ+ Every Letter Represents A Serious Psychotic sexual Identity Disorder
HEJTML²⁶ Hedonist Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar
SEJTML²⁷ Scientistic Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar

Reference Material

[All Web Pages listed in Site Map by date-of-publication;
oldest at the top, newest at the bottom of the list.]

Culture=Religion+Politics;  Who Are We?  Vic Biorseth

The Brilliantly Conceived Organization of the USA;  Vic Biorseth

Live Interviews

Return to the BLOG page

Return to the HOME PAGE

Subscribe to our Free E-Zine News Letter

---

Date:  Thu Apr 15 14:30:15 2021
From:  René Guerra, Sr.
Email:   Guerra.Rene@att.net
Location:  Cupertino, Marxifornia (aka "California"), USA
Comment: 

Finally, someone who gets and loud says it overall, and 99.99% accurately and veridically. This is material to be read and act upon by anyone and everyone who overall adheres to and vies to overall strengthen THE way The Founders CONSTITUTED the United Sates of America (magnificent deed they narrated for contemporaneity and posterity on four sheets of parchment manuscript they appropriately titled "The Constitution of the United States of America"), as based on the "In Congress, July 4, 1976, Unanimous Declaration of the Thirteen States of America" (aka "Declaration of Independence").

---

Date:  Fri Apr 16 2021
From:  Vic Biorseth
Comment:  

René:

If you liked this big long page, you will love all the much shorter ones this one addresses as 'consequences' of doing the things that they all recommend doing. You can see them all at the BREAKING-PARTY-AGENDAS-PAGES. 

Regards,

Vic

---

This Form cannot be submitted until the missing fields (labelled below in red) have been filled in

Add Your Comment

Please note that all fields followed by an asterisk must be filled in.

Name / Pseudo-Name:*

E-mail Address:

City / State / Country:

Comment:*

Please enter the word that you see below.

Copyrighted Material