Proposed Constitutional Amendment to neutralize the enemy within.

A proposed Constitutional Amendment to get anti-Constitutionalists out of power and authority, at least.

Vic Biorseth, Friday, December 21, 2012
http://www.CatholicAmericanThinker.com/

What? Another proposed Constitutional Amendment?  Elsewhere in this site I have already recommended an Amendment to repeal Amendment XVI (which established the income tax,) another Amendment to repeal Amendment XVII (which made Senators run for popular election just like Representatives) and repeal of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 (establishing the Federal Reserve.)  And, one by one, the elimination of all federal departments and bureaus not listed in Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution.  Isn’t that quite enough? 

 Well … no. 

 The longer whatever time we are allotted ticks on, the more complex we make the simple. 

 I am in the process of upgrading this site to the new BB2 release of the SBI! Website technology.  It requires going over a lot of old stuff written long ago as I convert it, and sometimes doing that stirs thought in new directions.  It is good to come back to the simple basics of a subject after it has been attacked and brutalized by enemies of the subject.  Sometimes in the adult world of responsibility the simplest details underlying what is true get lost in the complex arguments between factions.  This is particularly true when any of the factions are practicing deception and obfuscation. 

At any rate, I was converting the old Freedom's Circle page, and re-reading it returned me to the basic, fundamental nature of true freedom.  It's something I don't think about enough these days.  Because of the recent slaughter of the innocents done in the Sandy Hook elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut, and the horrible direction our whole nation seems to be taking, I was moved to put the following comment in the newly upgraded webpage:

I have written and talked about the unique ingenuity, beauty, majesty and Godly ideal of the design of America until I am blue in the face.  There is and has never been any other nation like it.  It is the first nation ever conceived and designed for the purpose of protecting the citizens from their own government.  This nation is absolutely unique in all of world history. There is no other nation, whether current or historical, in which the law stood separate from the government, and the government was not the law, but was subject to the law

We talked about our Founding Principles laid out in our Declaration of Independence.  About truths, rights and principles of natural law, written by God on the hearts of men.  Established by God, not by man, and not repeal-able or modifiable by man. Equality before the law. Life. Liberty. Pursuit of Happiness. That the very purpose of government was to protect and preserve these rights and principles.  That is the very reason we - the people - grant government the power to govern. Whenever the government violates this trust by violating these rights and principles, then we - the people - take it back and re-establish government for that purpose.   

And, we talked about our Constitutional Principles firmly fixed in our American Constitution.  The nature of a fixed legal document that represents the supreme law of the land, to which citizen and government, both, are subject.  Every man stands equal to the law; no man is above the law; no man is the law.  The Constitution is the law, and the government, and every single official of the government, and every citizen, is subject to to the same fixed law.  Here in America, for the first time in world history, the government is not the law; the Constitution is the law, and the government is subject to the law. 

Who protects the Constitution?

Every elected office holder and every appointed Justice swears an oath to protect the Constitution.  Here is the oath of office for the President of the United States:

Here is the oath of office for officers of the American armed forces:

Here is the oath of office for enlisted men in the American armed forces:

Officers and enlisted men in the service of the United States are duty bound to disobey any order that violates the Constitution of the United States.  This is not an oath to defend territory, or property, or persons; it is an oath to defend the Constitution, which is the core, foundation and cornerstone of the United States of America, as Constituted.  There is no duration or time limit specified in the oath. Once taken, it establishes a lifetime obligation. 

By now, I think you can see where this is going. All of the current enemies of the Constitution that pose the gravest threat to it are domestic enemies.  People who flat out oppose the Constitution and the Declaration are running the Democrat Party, the News Media, Academia, Education and most of Entertainment.  Marxists, Alinskyites, Moslems, Anarchists, Communists, Socialists, Statists and others who will not and cannot abide by the limitations of the Constitution are not only right here among us, but they are ruling us, or trying to.  It took a hundred years of creeping Marxism, under the guise of "Progressiveism" to establish all those gigantic un-Constitutional federal departments and bureaus that are now un-Constitutionally regulating us and spending us into oblivion. 

I submit that there is nothing in all of Marxism that is not antagonistic to if not diametrically opposed to the American Constitution.  It is not possible to be a Marxist, of any variety, and support the American Constitution.  See the Refuting Marx page. 

I submit that there is nothing in all of Islam that is not antagonistic to if not diametrically opposed to the American Constitution. It is not possible to be a Moslem, of any variety, and support the American Constitution.  See the Refuting Mohammed page. 

I submit that it is not possible to be a secularist and support the American Constitution. 

I submit that it is not possible to be an Anarchist and support the American Constitution.

To be a Globalist is to be an anti-Nationalist, which is to be an anti-American. 

If a Marxist, or a Moslem, or a Secularist, or an Anarchist, or a Globalist took an oath to protect and defend the American Constitution, he lied when he took the oath.  He swore falsely. 

The real problem may be that nobody takes it seriously any more.  An oath of office is now a mere ceremony; a photo-op and a publicity opportunity.  When the oath has no meaning any more, then, neither does the Constitution. 

Who will be left to defend it? 

=====

Sarcastic Acronym Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" it over a link without clicking just to see the simple acronym interpretation. Click any footnote link to see the acronym and a detailed explanation; "Hover" the mouse over it just to see the simple interpretation.)

SLIMC¹ Secularist Liberal Intellectual Media Complex
GESGOEAEOT² Gradually, Ever So Gradually, Over Eons And Eons Of Time
PEWAG³ Punctuated Equilibrium's Wild-Assed Guess
TTRSTF⁴ Them There Real Scientifical-Type Fellers
TTRSPTF⁵ Them There Real Smart Perfesser-Type Fellers
TTRSJTF⁶ Them There Real Smart Journalistical-Type Fellers
SNRTACBT⁷ Surely No Right Thinking Adult Could Believe Today
STNSEACPB⁸ Surely Today No Serious Educated Adult Could Possibly Believe
WDN⁹ We Don't Know
BMDFP¹⁰ Baboons, Mongrel Dogs, Filthy Pigs and ...
HBAACOTE¹¹ Human Beings Are A Cancer On The Earth
ACLU¹² Anti-Christian Litigation Union
FLORMPORIF¹³ Flagrant Liar, Or, Mindless Parrot, Or, Innocent Fool
MEJTML¹⁴ Marxist Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar
IEJTML¹⁵ Islamic Ends-Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar
MPAV¹⁶ Marxist Principles And Values
WBESSWG¹⁷ Wise, Benign, Elite, Super-Scientific World Governance
TRMITM¹⁸ The Reason Man's In This Mess
IYI¹⁹ Intellectual Yet Idiotic
TTRSCBTF²⁰ Them There Real Smart Catholic Bishop Type Fellers
IACMPVND²¹ Illegal-Alien-Criminal Marxocrat-Party-Voting Nation-Destroyers
PEJTML²² Palestinian Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar
PSYOP²³ "Psychological Operation" Mind Trick
CDC²⁴ Covid Developmentally Challenged
LGBTQ+ Every Letter Represents A Serious Psychotic sexual Identity Disorder
HEJTML²⁶ Hedonist Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar
SEJTML²⁷ Scientistic Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar

Reference Material

[All Web Pages listed in Site Map by date-of-publication;
oldest at the top, newest at the bottom of the list.]

Culture=Religion+Politics;  Who Are We?  Vic Biorseth

The Brilliantly Conceived Organization of the USA;  Vic Biorseth

Live Interviews

Return to the BLOG page

Return to the HOME PAGE

Subscribe to our Free E-Zine News Letter

---

Date: Mon Dec 24 13:26:15 2012 
From:   andye
Email:   andrewetchen.ae@gmail.com
Location:   Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Comment:  

There is no one left to defend the constitution, or any of the traditional ways of thinking.  Social, moral, political, & religious, threads that we hold on to should be taken with us and safely established elsewhere.  America is not the land, it is the people.  The people can make America anywhere.  To God is a journey, not a destination.  It is our duty to deliver ourselves to God, in a most pleasing way, where He stands.  Whenever all is lost, we must take footsteps toward God.  I like to say;  We shall ALL bend our knee before the Lord.

---

Date: Wed Dec 26 05:28:04 2012 
From: Vic Biorseth 
Comment:   

Andye:

There is much truth in your words, but there are still some of us left.  I pray that younger men will learn and keep the traditions and pass them on to future generations, here and elsewhere. 

As for me, at this stage of my life, I am not going anywhere.  This is my native land; this is where I built my home, and this, right here, is where I will live free and die.  In this life I will not yield one square inch of American sovereignty.  I will keep my faith in God, I will remain true to the Church He founded, and I will keep my oath to defend the Constitution. 

Thank you for your thought provoking, soul stirring words of truth. 

Regards,

Vic

---

Date:  Sat Mar 16 16:12:49 2013
From:  Aleksei
Email:   
Location:  Moskva
Comment: 

Victor-

If you claim to be free thinking country you cannot outlaw an idea, or a religion.  Because you say Islam is not a religion does not stop it from being a religion.  Because you say the ideology of Marx is anti-American does not allow you to outlaw it.  It is an idea.  The ideas that oppose your ideas are the ones you are most supposed to protect, if your principles of free thought are true.  In proposing these things you violate your own principles in the worst way. 

"I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -Voltaire.

---

Date:  Sat Mar 16 17:41:30 2013
From:  Vic Biorseth
Comment:  

Aleksei:

These are ideas, yes, but they are ideas that intend to do violence to and destroy the existing system.  You cannot be welcoming to an ideology that intends your destruction.  That might be likened to the famous Julia Child setting the table and preparing a banquet for a tribe of cannibals.  The preparations might be nice, but the rest of the banquet might not be so pleasant from the viewpoint of Julia Child.

Marxism opposes private property, in favor of collective property, and redistribution.  This opposes our Constitutional right to private property as set forth in the fourth and  fourteenth Amendments.  Marxism opposes religion, in opposition to our Constitutional right to exercise our religion in the first Amendment, and in opposition to the foundational recognition of our religion in our Declaration of Independence.  Marxism opposes most of all our ability to prosper from our own work, which is called the God-given right to the Pursuit of Happiness in our Declaration.  Marxism is straightforward in in saying that it intends, ultimately, to use violent revolution to achieve its ends.  There is more, but those are the big points.

Islam opposes our individual liberty, totally. 

The Koran, in Sura 9:29 directs all Moslems to make war on us until every one of us is either converted to Islam, or, not converted but totally subjugated under Islamic law and paying a special tax, or, dead.

That opposes Equality before the law, Life, Liberty and the Puruit of Happiness - all the elemental rights that are foundational to America.  It violates every part of the First Amendment, let alone all the others. Forget due process; forget everything the Constitution says. 

Marx himself said that there is no reconciliation possible between Marxism and Americanism. 

Mohammed himself said that there is no reconciliation possible between Islam and non-Islam. 

It is not possible for a Marxist or a Moslem to swear an oath to protect the Constitution of the United Sates without lying. 

It is not possible for a Marxist or a Moslem to live indefinitely among a not-Marxist, non-Moslem (respectively) people without eventually working to subjugate or destroy them. 

The un-recognized enemy is the one most likely to kill you. 

Around here, it allways seems that the ones quoting Voltaire the most, smiling the most, and trying to get us all to play nice, are the Democrats.  (I mean the Marxists and Moslems.)

Regards,

Vic

---

Date:   Sun Aug 31 2014
From:  Vic Biorseth
Comment:  

Changes pursuant to changing the website URL and name from 
Thinking Catholic Strategic Center to
Catholic American Thinker.

Pulled the trigger on the 301 MOVE IT option June 1, 2014. Working my way through all the webpages.  . 

Regards,

Vic

---

Date:  Fri Oct 12 22:54:28 2018
From:  Elaine
Email:   biglanie85@gmail.com
Location:  Bonney Lake, WA USA
Comment: 

The American Constitution is anti-God because it is anti-Catholic.

It has been an instrument used by anti-God, anti-Catholics to entrench into society and life the false religions of Protestantism, Judaism, and Masonry. These anti-God, anti-Catholic religions have proven that their fruit is chaos, war, division, strife, destruction of the foundations of civilization (Catholicism and the family), and death of innocent children in the womb and children "allowed" to be born.

The Protestant and French Revolts against God and His one, true Catholic Church, birthed the U.S. Thus, it is on its way to collapse as the rejection of God and His revealed Truth can lead to nothing but destruction and death.

---

Date:  Sat Oct 13 2018
From:  Vic Biorseth
Comment:  

Elaine:

You'll have to show me the clause in the American Constitution that is anti-Catholic. I can't seem to find it.

And you've got your history backwards; the French Revolution happened after the American Revolution, not before. 

Find a more Catholic-friendly nation and go live there for awhile, and let us all know how that works out for you. 

Regards,

Vic

---

Date:  Fri Jul 01 04:27:09 2022
From:  TeJa
Email:   
Location:  
Comment: 

People who don't agree with what you say can't be citizens? 

You want to stop citizens from being citizens?

This needs to be shut down. You cannot say these things.

---

Date:  Fri Jul 01 2022
From:  Vic Biorseth
Comment:  

TeJa:

Yes I can. The fact that I just said them proves that I can say them. 

It isn't that they disagree with me that the shouldn't be citizens, but that they attack our very foundation for national citizenship that they shouldn't be citizens. 

If you didn't like this page, you will hate The Case For Banishment, the Blessed Polarization and the Blessed Divisiveness pages. 

Regards,

Vic

---

Date:  Fri Jul 01 17:32:27 2022
From:  Linda
Email:   
Location:  
Comment: 

Vic, Moskva

The United States is founded on Biblical, but particularly Christian presuppositions.  Of these, the living, individual soul of man is the source of his personhood (inner person) created in the image of the living, personal Triune God.   When the Constitution speaks of "we the people" it isn't referring to our bodies but the spiritual source of our personhood.

Without the Triune God, as Marxism--a form of paganism-- posits, man is not a person but an animal.  Marxism is poison.  It denies man's inner person, hence it logically denies and destroys the purpose and meaning of the Constitution.   No one in his right mind protects poison .

As for the deity of Islam, Allah, 'he' is not Jehovah but a version of the Moon-god, 

" a pagan god in Arabia who was worshipped during pre-Islamic times. And that is why the Crescent moon is the symbol of Islam, and the month-long Ramadan fasting begins and ends with the crescent moon."

The evidence of this can be found in the extensive archeological digs in the Middle East over the last 100 years. A temple of the Moon-god was excavated in Ur by Sir Leonard Woolley. The examples of moon worship which he found can now be seen in the British Museum. In the 1950s, a temple to the Moon-god was excavated at Hazer in Palestine. Two idols of the Moon-god were found. Each was a statue of a man seated on a throne with a crescent moon carved on his chest."

"Also in the 1950s, archeologists excavated sites at Qataban, Timna, and Marib. Thousands of inscriptions from walls and rocks in Northern Arabia have also been collected. Reliefs and votive bowls used in worship of the "daughters of Allah" have also been discovered. The three daughters, al-Lat, al-Uzza, and Manat, are sometimes depicted together with Allah the Moon-god represented by a crescent moon above them. The archeological evidence demonstrates that the dominant religion of Arabia was the cult of the Moon-god."

"The oldest name of the Moon-God was Sin, of Sumerian origin. Hence, Sinai, or the wilderness of Sin. While the Arabs worshipped 360 gods at the Kabah in Mecca, the Mood-god was the chief deity. The Moon-god was also called Il or Ilah, which eventually became Allah." The Origin of Allah, Samuel Blumenfeld, Chalcedon

Allah is a pagan deity.  Thus there is an illusion,  but really no source for life, mind, or soul.   Islam is poison.

---

Date:  Sat Jul 02 2022
From:  Vic Biorseth
Comment:  

Linda:

Thank you; this validates what we wrote in Liberty versus Marxism and Islam, Refuting Mohammed and elsewhere herein. It was Mohammed's first condemning all the gods of the Kabah, then, relenting under criticism and allowing a few of them, was written about by Salmon Rushdie, earning him an Islam-wide death sentence. 

To this day all knowledgeable and proper Moslem idiots march around the Kabah, throw stones at the devil, etc., in ancient practices that all predate Islam, Mohammed, and everything Mohammed ever said. 

The crescent moon is atop all Mosques. Moslems are nuttier than the Moonies and they don't even know it. We can recognize that it's not all their fault since that's how they were raised, but that doesn't change the fact that they are nuttier than the Moonies. 

Your first two paragraphs very concisely validated what it took me so many words to say in Innies and Outies treatment of Rights versus Responsibilities.  

Your scholarship is a real blessing to the cause of Truth.

Regards,

Vic

---

Date:  Sat Jul 02 11:25:55 2022
From:  Pidlubniak
Email:   slavapidlubniak@yahoo.com.ua
Location:  Ukraine
Comment: 

Linda, Vic,

On the contrary, Muslim conception of God is not derived from their pagan roots, but from Judaism and, implicitly, Zoroastrianism (one and only God that is outside creation and that cannot have more than one person is actually a Zoroastrian teaching. This utter monotheism - which they use to "disprove" the Trinity - is called Tawhid by Muslims and the "Shema Yisrael" by the Jews. Ultimately, it is refuted because the whole conception of God as being only one is still a man-made limitation on God - as if God couldn't defy man-made logic and do other miraculous stuff like be in three persons but having one essence). Earlier pagan stuff plays a role, however - Muhammad implicitly went on the path of the Iranian Magi by trying to paint some of the pagan gods as powers worthy of worship/like angels and stuff - alas, it proved to be one of Muhammad's gaffes and so, he abrogated it when it didn't work out. Zoroastrians, however, did this more successfully - they've made pagan gods who were popular (like Mithra, Verethragna, Haoma, Anahita/Harahvaiti - despite the objections of Zarathustra himself) into yazatas/powers worthy of worship (the very concept of angelogy, in fact, derives from Zoroastrian tendency to worship yazatas - when people associate angels with seasons and other stuff in folklore, they implicitly pay homage to Zoroastrianism). The moon symbolism in Islam comes from the moon calendar which is used for calculation of the Ramadan - and the crescent was a late Middle Ages innovation, one that came from the Turks (and not from Arabs - see the legend of Osman the First). Anyway, while Islam is a false religion indeed, the whole brouhaha of the "Allah is the moon god precisely" is early 20th century scholarship that didn't even study the faith in question - the same one that produced such gems as "Elohim was the Canaanite word for "gods" and, so YHVH is a god from that polytheistic pantheon" (this hare-brained line of reasoning is still used by "historical-critical scholars") and "Zoroastrianism is pure monotheism" (that one was a product of a fella by the name of Martin Haug - whose interpretations changed Zoroastrianism in India by itself as they've had no complicated theology like the Christian one). "Allah" (earlier form "al-Ilah", meaning "THE god") was indeed a term for a top god of some pantheon that brought rain, but that could easily be some sort of freak influence of Zoroastrianism, Judaism or Christianity and almost nothing that can be connected specifically to the moon. But the wealth of what Muhammad took from the Zoroastrians cannot be understated. Islamic angels like Harut, Marut and Surush are all Zoroastrian figures - Harut is Haurvatat, the Amesha Spenta (something like an archangel, but not quite) of bodily health, Marut is Ameretat, the Amesha Spenta of immortality and Surush is Sraosha, one of the most popular Zoroastrian yazatas, a yazata of obedience. One of the most important theological plancks of Islam is the Sirat - the bridge of judgement. This is a straight copy of the Zoroastrian Chinvat bridge - every human soul will walk on these bridges to paradise. The righteous will find the way easy and wide; the sinners will find the bridge to be as thin and as sharp as a blade and, as such, will fall into hell. Another two ideas that got taken from Zoroastrianism by Islam is the idea of the scales that weign good and bad deeds and the concept of the sinners in hell being given disgusting food that does not nourish them and keeps them hungry. Some people even link the Islamic concept of the houris - a.k.a. the 72 beautiful virgins every jihadist receives in Jannah/Paradise - with the Zoroastrian concept of one's own Daena/conscience appearing as a beautiful maiden to a good person, but that link is dubious. Bottomline, Islam has a lot of pagan stuff in it, but pre-Islamic polytheism of the Arabs played only a cursory role (even the custom of completely covering a woman is of, well, Jewish origin).

---

Date:  Sat Jul 02 d2022
From:  Vic Biorseth
Comment:  

Linda and Pidlubniak:

I stand in pedestrian awe of the depths of your knowledge.

Regards,

Vic

---

Date:  Sat Jul 02 12:32:39 2022
From:  Pidlubniak
Email:   slavapidlubniak@yahoo.com.ua
Location:  Ukraine
Comment: 

Vic,

Thank you for your kind words. But I am no scholar - merely a dedicated hobbyist, if you will. To me, Indo-Iranian religious traditions (Hinduism, Zoroastrianism and Buddhism) are a must-study for every Christian. Things like Gnosticism, after all, came from a mix of Buddhist and Zoroastrian ideas. Judaism as a faith is even influenced by Zoroastrianism, too (I've already detailed from where exactly did they took their hardline monotheist imagining of God and Babylonian Talmud has a lot in common with Zoroastrian purification laws - Zoroastrianism even has significant roles in the Bible as it was the religion of benevolent Persian kings like Darius and Cyrus - as well as the religion of the three Magis/Wise Men, who searched for Jesus (likely mistaking Him for Astvat-Ereta, the Zoroastrian messiah)), to say nothing of Jewish folklore, which outright loaned the demon Asmodeus from Zoroastrians (there's a demon of wrath there, Aeshma-daeva). Hinduism now stands as the most culturally-significant form of paganism now on this planet ('tis be no exaggeration to say that what Greece and Rome are for us, India and China are for all those East and South-East Asian nations). And, while studying these cultures and religions is fascinating by itself, one of the main reasons to study them for a Christian is simple - know thy enemy. For example, you can utterly eviscerate Hinduism by using Zoroastrian critiques of it's practices and gods against it (for example, did you know that modern Hindu god Shiva had an earlier form - Rudra (with multiple aspects, such as Sarva and Manyu) - and Zoroastrians had such a glowing reception to it's worship and it's worshippers (marauding, nomadic, slave-raiding, cattle-killing bands of warriors) that the aspect Sarva was demonized a daeva/demon of oppression and the aspect Manyu outright became the Zoroastrian greatest demon-god, Angra Mainyu/Ahriman?). When Hindus object that they do not worship demons, you can cheerfully point them at the Zoroastrian less-then-glowing reception of their gods (so much that "daeva"/"god" became the word for "demon" in Iranian languages) - there, Indar/Hindu Indra is revealed as... A demon of fraud. The Nasatya - one of the twin horse gods of the Hindus - become Nanghaithya, a demon of discontent. Even Varuna - the Vedic god of skies and seas, watcher of Rta/justice (Zoroastrian Asha) was split in two - his positive characteristics went straight into formation of Ahura Mazda and his name became the name of the demon of homosexuality, Varun (because of the whole Varuna-Mitra pairing subtext in Vedic religion). The proper study of these cultures is also important as misinterpretations of them (like that damned Austrian who took the Iranian ethnonym ("Airya" is the ethnonym of the Persians, it comes from "Airyanem Vaejo" and is NOT a racial term!) and made it into a racial term) can actually prove catastrophic.

---

This Form cannot be submitted until the missing fields (labelled below in red) have been filled in

ADD COMMENT

Please note that all fields followed by an asterisk must be filled in.

Name / Pseudo-Name:*

E-mail Address:

City / State / Country:

Comment:*

Please enter the word that you see below.

Copyrighted Material