The Case for Treason.

Vic Biorseth, Monday, July 30, 2012
https://www.catholicamericanthinker.com

What, exactly, is Treason? From the American Constitution:

Article III Section. 3. Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

===

I submit that “levying war” on the American Constitution is, precisely, levying war against the United States. The Constitution is what Constitutes and makes up the United States. If it wasn’t for the Constitution, the United States would not exist.

The Presidential Oath of Office, again, from the Constitution:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

===

The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, no one is above it, and no law from any source may be superimposed over it or in its place. All new legislated law must conform to the Constitution and not oppose or violate it in any way. All Legislative and Judicial officeholders are required to affirm the legal supremacy of the Constitution and to solemnly promise to preserve and protect it before they assume office. From Article VI of the Constitution:

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

Again, to repeat the point: I submit that “levying war” on the American Constitution is, precisely, levying war against the United States. The Constitution is what Constitutes and makes up the United States. If it wasn’t for the Constitution, the United States would not exist. Whatever does injury to the Constitution does injury to America as founded and as Constituted.

There have been too many violations of the Constitution committed under this administration to count. It passed the point of treason long ago. The President, the Vice President, multiple members of the House and of the Senate, and five Justices of the Supreme Court have all violated their oaths to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. If their actions stand, then the Constitution itself may as well not even exist.

For my evidences, I invite you to re-read the American Constitutional Principles page, paying particular attention to all the Constitutional violations. If you ignore all but the ones involved in Obamacare, you will still see multiple radical violations of the Constitution by all participants, all of whom were sworn to defend the Constitution, and all of whom violated their oaths of office. Just right off the bat, there is nothing in Article 1 Section 8 about the federal government providing either health care or health care insurance for the population. Such radical overreaching, as has been done on a lesser scale by administrations since Woodrow Wilson, violates the Constitutional principle that the powers of the federal government are limited and enumerated by Article 1 Section 8.

We never even should have gone there. But that’s not all, if you read how it was passed in the linked article. It wasn’t even legislated Constitutionally. It wasn’t even signed into a law Constitutionally. It violated the most important Constitutional principle of all – that the Constitution itself protects the people from the government. With this abomination of a law, the federal government may now order citizens to buy something they do not wish to buy, and legally punish them if they do not buy it. The scope of this completely new and completely unconstitutional new government power is absolutely unlimited.

The Purpose for America’s Being is laid out in our Delcaration of Independence, and our national organization – our Constitution – is therein called for to protect and defend our national purpose for being. For the first time in world history, a nation was born and designed to be a nation of laws and not merely of men; a nation with guaranteed citizen rights, and with established legal protection of the people from their own government. This is what we get from our Declaration:

• That all men are created equal, meaning that we all stand equal before the law, in a land where no man is above the law. American citizens enjoy legal equality, i.e., equality of opportunity. Equal opportunity naturally flows out from equal treatment before the law. There can be no equal opportunity in the absence of equality before the law.
• That they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights – these rights are not given by man, or by government, or by any worldly authority. The rights are an endowment of God, and no man, and no government, may ever interfere with them or take them away.
• That among these rights are Life … it is an irrevocable right of all in this land to live an uninterrupted life. No innocent human is to be deprived of life, and no guilty person is to be deprived of life without due process of law, before which he stands equal to all other men.
• Liberty … here Liberty does not mean merely the freedom from being bound to any employer or any property owner or any class or order of men; it also means freedom from the American government. Here men are free so long as they adhere to the law, including especially the supreme law of the land, which is the Constitution. An American may live where he chooses, move about freely and as often as he wishes, work for any employer, change employment, and not be directed or controlled in his daily activities by government.
• Pursuit of Happiness … which means that a citizen is free to work for his own advantage, profit by his own work, and choose what that work might be. He may create his own business or hire himself out to work for others, as he and he alone sees fit. Here a man may find his own niche where he will be happiest. When men have Liberty and they enjoy the right to the Pursuit of Happiness, then and only then the Free Market – i.e., Capitalism – springs forth and automatically comes into being.
• To secure these rights – Equality before the law;Life;Liberty;The Pursuit of Happiness – the government is established, deriving it’s just powers from the consent of the governed.
• When government destroys these rights, it is the right of the People to altar or abolish it and institute new government;
• The foundational Principles and formal Organization (Constitution) of the powers of government are to be laid in such a way as to reestablish and protect these God-given rights – Equality before the law;Life;Liberty;The Pursuit of Happiness.

This, then, is the very purpose for our Constitution, and the very purpose for our American national being. It is why we exist as a nation, and how we are to proceed in securing our founding national principles and citizen rights, and in the control of our government. Thus, we are a nation of laws, and not of men. The law stands above our government, and does not subsist in the government. The government is ruled by the law, rather than the law being ruled by the government. Administrations come and go; Congresses come and go; Supreme Courts come and go; only the law remains. We the People are the sovereign citizens of the American nation. We have our three co-equal branches of government to counter-balance and hold each other in conformity with the supreme law, but there is a fourth co-equal partner to consider: We the People. We are the final check on the government.

I submit that the three branches of the American government have failed in their responsibility to keep law within the constraints of the Constitution. Obamacare presents the most recent and the most egregious example of this total failure, but certainly not the first one. As we said before, most recently in the Anti-American Americans page, in the Restoring America section, the three branches are co-equal; none has any special superiority over the other branches. There is nothing in the Constitution, for instance, granting special Constitutional interpretive authority to the Court over the other two branches. The fact that, since the 1803 Maybury v. Madison case law precedent, the Supreme Court showed that it could strike down unconstitutional law, represents a legal precedent, not a Constitutional principle. The other two branches have exactly the same ability and responsibility to keep Court findings within the constraints of the Constitution. The fact that they have never done it does not mean that it cannot or should not be done. It merely means that the other two branches have failed in their responsibility to the Constitution and to the People. Again, read the Anti-American Americans page for examples of when and how they should have acted just as the Court did in Maybury v. Madison.

Legislated law that violates the Constitution is no law.

Legal Precedent that violates the Constitution is no Legal Precedent.

Executive Order that violates the Constitution is no Executive Order.

Unlegislated Regulation that violates the Constitution is no law.

It may be argued that Unlegislated, Unrepresentative Regulation is no law.

Court Decisions that violate the Constitution have no legal standing.

Back to the Treason argument.

Violation of one’s oath of office is a “high crime or misdemeanor” at the very least, and may indeed be treason. I submit that violation of one’s oath of office is therefore, at the very least, an impeachable offense. Impeachment may be applied against any and all civil officers of the United States, and is not limited to the President and Vice President alone. Senators, Representatives and Supreme Court Justices, all, may be impeached from office. See Article 2 Section 4 of the Constitution. Anyone may be tried for treason.

But treason involves more than merely violating one’s oath of office, and it is, as it should be, a more difficult charge to make. In the case of the passage of Obamacare, or the “Affordable” Health Care Act, the oaths of office were violated by:

1. The President, in signing it into law;
2. The Senators who voted to pass it;
3. The Representatives who voted to pass it;
4. The Supreme Court Justices who voted to constitutionally sustain it.

That all of these oaths of office were violated is clear and obvious to anyone who can read. There is virtually no part of this Bill-become-Law that is Constitutional. The question regarding the treason charge revolves round whether any oath violator intended, by that act, to destroy the legal supremacy of the Constitution, and thereby destroy America as founded and constituted. I submit that the Constitution is the USA; it is how we are constituted. Therefore, any President, Senator, Representative or Justice who purposely sought to destroy the legal supremacy of the Constitution was in fact a domestic enemy of America. (Enemy of America and enemy of the Constitution are synonymous terms.)

Any investigation into intent must therefore look not only into any possible conspiracy, but also at any clear adherence to alien enemy ideologies, which stand opposed to America and her Constitution. This adherence or commitment to an enemy ideology may be ascertained by the subject’s own written and spoken words, affiliations and actions. There are two major political ideologies that stand diametrically opposed to the American Constitution, and they are:

• the revolutionary, sociological, economic, political ideologies based on the writings of Karl Marx, under the broad title of Marxism;
• the religious, political, legal, theocratic ideologies based on the recorded words of Mohammed, under the broad title of Islam.

Both of these alien ideologies absolutely oppose the American Constitution, in all particulars, and they therefore pose a threat to America, and stand as enemy ideologies. Marxism seeks and intends to eventually eliminate all private property, sovereignty, borders, nations and governments, including this one. Islam seeks and intends to eventually eliminate all other religions, all other legal systems, and all other forms of government, including this one. Both of these alien enemy ideologies fully intend to use violence, both have historically used violence, and both are currently using violence, as needed, to achieve their ultimate ideological ends.

Marxist Ideological Infiltration has had huge success in America since the publication of Marx’s Communist Manifesto in 1848. After multiple humiliating revolutionary failures, and after encountering the particularly tough-nut-to-crack American system, Marxism went underground and pretended to be other than what it was. It still followed the evil dictums of Machiavelli, and it still employed the infamous Hegelian Dialectic, and it still worked toward eventual revolution; but all that was tempered and somewhat camouflaged by the educational techniques of the likes of John Dewey, newer items like the Cloward-Piven Strategy, and the sneaky stratagems of the likes of Saul Alinsky. The organizers and agent-provocateurs put on suits and ties, political smiles, and pretended to love America as they went about their evil Marxist work.

Marxist ideology today can be identified among teachers, journalists, commentators, politicians and office holders by tendencies favoring redistributionism, movement toward controlling if not collectivizing the citizenry, opposition to Christianity and Judaism, tendency toward growing government to solve problems, encouraging class envy and class warfare, demonizing the rich and the successful, opposition to border security and sovereignty in general, and support for the “perfection” of mankind, the world, society and everything.

We went over how American culture was infiltrated and at least partially taken over by Marxist Ideology in the Anti-American Americans page, and I won’t repeat all that again here. Go to the link for more details of how it came to be. Even among those of us who are not Marxist ideologues, many see Marxist ideology as harmless, which is the worst imaginable situation. Many good Americans see this alien and enemy ideology as merely another, relatively innocent, political opinion. But, you see, it is not innocent; it is evil, and malevolent. Every part of it opposes the Constitution.

I submit that today, Marxist ideology virtually owns the Democrat Party, most of the “Establishment” Republican Party, Public Education, upper academia, journalism, the SLIMC¹ , popular entertainment and celebrity. And it owns the current President. He is bred in it; he has steeped in it all his life.

Islamic ideological infiltration is a newer threat, but no less malevolent and treacherous than sneaking Marxism. Modern Islam has adopted many of Marxism’s deceptive stratagems, smiling as it works toward revolution from the inside. The Obama administration, the Democrat Party and the SLIMC¹ are working in concert to mask the Islamic threat and to project Islam as a “religion of peace.” They even go so far as to purge words like terrorism or anything violent from any linkage whatsoever with the word Islam or Islamic. Reach-across-the-aisle establishment Republicans like John McCain and John Boehner fully cooperate in this pro-Islamic public propaganda, to the detriment of the American Constitution to which Islam is so vehemently and irreconcilably opposed.

If you somehow doubt that our current President despises Christianity and Judaism, and that he treats Islam in a highly preferential way, I invite you to read the Obama the Moslem page, and also view the video there. His own words convict him.

Marxism and Islam link up again as they did in World War II, to destabilize and destroy Western Culture before considering what to do about each other. “The enemy of my enemy is my friend” is the basis of this temporary alliance of mortal enemies. Both ideologies seek global domination and subjugation of all peoples; both cannot be successful at achieving that goal. But, they can “partner up” to defeat an enemy that is stronger than either of them. The fact that these malevolent ideologies of world conquest are not widely recognized for what they really are, is what makes them so very dangerous to the world. All you have to do is read the Manifesto. All you have to do is read the Koran. It’s all right there in front of our eyes.

The Fast and Furious Program involved US government agents purposely putting the best military light weaponry into the hands of Mexican murderers so that they would commit murders with them, and then the investigating US agents would implicate American gun shows and gun dealers in a highly public condemnation of Amendment 2 of the Constitution, with the willing aid of the SLIMC¹ . It was intended to be a path to popular support for a repeal of the second amendment.

Now the second amendment was intended, like the rest of the Constitution, to protect the free citizenry from their government. The current administration intended to turn that upside down, like most other governments, so that the government was protected and more insulated from the people. We talked about this in the Gun Control page. The American notion of citizen gun rights is modeled after the Swiss example, in which every man is armed, keeps his arms at home, and even heavy, crew-served weaponry is maintained in private households. In Switzerland this was born of necessity, in a small country accessible at every point along its borders, from many nations, any one or all of which might turn hostile at any time. This principle is less important in America, but is still important; the larger intention of the American framers was to insure the American people against an eventually ruthless and domineering government. As Benjamin Franklin famously said, any government that cannot trust its people with arms cannot be trusted by its people.

I submit that once an honest investigation has been completed it will be shown that the intention of Fast and Furious was, from the beginning, a direct attack on the Constitution.

This was no ordinary drone. It employed the latest super-secret stealth technology, and it was so secret that nobody even knew it existed. It also employed new super-secret computer technology, including special control technology, communication, GPS, super-secret optics, weaponry, targeting ability and more, all unique to this highly classified weapon system. If a control failure occurred, and if a communication failure occurred, it had on-board intelligence and technical capability to search-out and find a secure place, land itself, repair itself and/or “beacon” to be picked up. It could be destroyed – blown to smithereens – by its operators, or, if it detected that it was about to be discovered by enemies, it could blow itself up, completely on its own.

But, you see, it landed, right in front of the bad guys, and it turned itself over to the Iranians and the Red Chinese who were waiting for it. How? The official story, briefly spoken of once, and then dropped by the SLIMC¹ , was that the Chinese or “someone” hacked into the code and took control of the drone, and delivered it to the Iranian officials and the Chinese agents who were waiting for it. I don’t know how this all happened, but I can tell you this with a high degree of certainty:

          No outsider hacked into that code.

First of all, how would they know it existed?

This drone employed the most effective stealth technology in the world, completely invisible to radar. So, how did the Iranians (or anyone) even know it was there?

If it simply crashed, how would they know it, and how would they find it?

If it detected some mechanical break-down and needed to land itself, in the vastness of the Iranian desert, why would it pick a place to land itself right under the noses of those who were waiting for it, and then not self-destruct?

This was an Inside Job, with special security clearances required to pull it off that point directly at the highest levels of government. We have been betrayed. Mark my words: this weapon system, or some manifestation of it, will eventually be used against us. Perhaps in Afghanistan, perhaps in New York, perhaps in Washington DC, perhaps against some navy vessel or fleet. Huge mountains of formerly secret technologies involving stealth, radars, software, GPS, communications, physical optics, weaponry and more have been handed over to our enemies.

The Stealth Drone represents the perfect delivery system for multiple nuclear warheads or any other form of WMD, and now Iran has it, and the Red Chinese have it.

God help us. God help Israel. God help the world.

Once upon a time in this country, simple Truth was of vital importance. If there is any one thing that I have been taken to task for more than any other on this Website, it is that I tend to see everything as simple, black-and-white, true-or-untrue, no-shades-of-gray, right or wrong. I submit that everything is – or everything should be – just that simple. If we pay most attention to the most important things, all lesser issues just fall into place. God comes first; everything else sorts itself out.

Our Founding Fathers and the Framers of our Constitution never anticipated this situation. They never could have believed that the highest officers of the government they designed might violate their oaths of office, or take the oath so lightly as to be a small part of a mere ceremony, little more than a photo-op. They would never believe it.

In their day, a man’s word was his bond. If he said it, that was final. Any slight insinuation that a man’s word was in question might land you on the field of honor with a dueling pistol in your hand. And to put one’s hand on Scripture and solemnly swear to something was as serious as it could ever get. How could the Constitution be protected if men’s word had become worthless? How could the Constitution remain “The Law” if no officers of the government steadfastly and assiduously protected and defended it?

A thing is either True, or it is not.

A man’s word is either trustworthy, or it is not.

The Holy Bible government officials place their hands upon during their swearing-in either means something important to us as a people, or it does not.

=====

Sarcastic Acronym Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" it over a link without clicking just to see the simple acronym interpretation. Click any footnote link to see the acronym and a detailed explanation; "Hover" the mouse over it just to see the simple interpretation.)

SLIMC¹ Secularist Liberal Intellectual Media Complex
GESGOEAEOT² Gradually, Ever So Gradually, Over Eons And Eons Of Time
PEWAG³ Punctuated Equilibrium's Wild-Assed Guess
TTRSTF⁴ Them There Real Scientifical-Type Fellers
TTRSPTF⁵ Them There Real Smart Perfesser-Type Fellers
TTRSJTF⁶ Them There Real Smart Journalistical-Type Fellers
SNRTACBT⁷ Surely No Right Thinking Adult Could Believe Today
STNSEACPB⁸ Surely Today No Serious Educated Adult Could Possibly Believe
WDN⁹ We Don't Know
BMDFP¹⁰ Baboons, Mongrel Dogs, Filthy Pigs and ...
HBAACOTE¹¹ Human Beings Are A Cancer On The Earth
ACLU¹² Anti-Christian Litigation Union
FLORMPORIF¹³ Flagrant Liar, Or, Mindless Parrot, Or, Innocent Fool
MEJTML¹⁴ Marxist Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar
IEJTML¹⁵ Islamic Ends-Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar
MPAV¹⁶ Marxist Principles And Values
WBESSWG¹⁷ Wise, Benign, Elite, Super-Scientific World Governance
TRMITM¹⁸ The Reason Man's In This Mess
IYI¹⁹ Intellectual Yet Idiotic
TTRSCBTF²⁰ Them There Real Smart Catholic Bishop Type Fellers
IACMPVND²¹ Illegal-Alien-Criminal Marxocrat-Party-Voting Nation-Destroyers
PEJTML²² Palestinian Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar
PSYOP²³ "Psychological Operation" Mind Trick
CDC²⁴ Covid Developmentally Challenged
LGBTQ+ Every Letter Represents A Serious Psychotic sexual Identity Disorder
HEJTML²⁶ Hedonist Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar
SEJTML²⁷ Scientistic Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar

Reference Material

[All Web Pages listed in Site Map by date-of-publication;
oldest at the top, newest at the bottom of the list.]

Culture=Religion+Politics;  Who Are We?  Vic Biorseth

The Brilliantly Conceived Organization of the USA;  Vic Biorseth

Live Interviews

Return to the BLOG page

Return to the HOME PAGE

Subscribe to our Free E-Zine News Letter

---

Date: Fri Aug 03 05:22:21 2012
From: Jenny
Email:
Location:
Comment:

You say that “Obamacare” as you put it is unconstitutional before you even look at the particulars because it is not named in the Constitution. Well there are a whole lot of things not named there. Would you get rid of Social Security because it is not named in the Constitution?

---

Date: Fri Aug 03 07:06:58 2012
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

Jenny:

Yes. The powers and the authority of the federal government, and the areas that may be addressed by legislation, are limited and enumerated in Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution. The whole point of my argument is that Presidents and Congresses since Woodrow Wilson have been sidestepping or overstepping the Constitution in instituting just such programs as Social Security. See the Stop the Spending page, and all the articles linked in the right hand column of that page. When it is completed, every unconstitutional bureaucracy will have been addressed there. Social Security has to end; somewhere in that mess I explain how to do it without cutting people already retired. None of those bureaucracies and none of those unrepresentative, unaccountable regulators should even exist. None of them are Constitutional.

If you read that article and the ones in the right hand column, you will see that we will only come back to being an economic dynamo by first increasing unemployment – among IRS agents, and all the petty bureaucrats, regulators and swat teams in HHS, Education, DHS, DOE, DOC, etc., etc., etc., ad infinitum. None of them – not one of them – is Constitutional. They will all have to find real jobs that produce real things, or real services, in a competitive market. Like the rest of us. And they will have all gotten out of our way.

Regards,

Vic

---

Date: Fri Aug 03 13:37:57 2012
From: Airmariaman of the Stealth Unit of the Yeast-Salt-Light Brigade
Email: missioimmaculatae@gmail.com
Location: Anápolis - Goias, Brazil
Comment:

Vic, this is extremely BAD news -- I'm referring to the stealth drone story. Please indicate where we can get more information. How did you find out about this?

---

Date: Fri Aug 03 16:45:48 2012
From: Airmariaman of the Stealth Air Unit of the Yeast-Salt-Light Brigade
Email: missioimmaculatae@gmail.com
Location: Anápolis - Goias, Brazil
Comment:

Vic, I did a little google-search on the downed stealth drone, and realize now that it was not such a secret, but that I am have a really big blind spot with regard especially to secular news. I'm down in Brazil, in a religious community, and about all the news I get is from LifeSiteNews newsletters, your newsletter, and RenewAmerica. I'm also getting WND notices and I think NewsMax is sending me stuff now. Anyway, religious/missionary life doesn't mix too well with intensive vigilance over the world situation, as much as it intrigues me. I do my best, but it is a real eye-opener for me that such a catastrophe as the downed drone could have got by me. I guess I'm a lot more "ignorant" than I would have guessed--at least when it comes to the particulars. I feel pretty confident that my grasp of the general situation is more secure than many newshounds, partly because of the spiritual advantage I have as a religious and priest (grace), but also because a steady scanning of headlines (high-level) information allows one to "see the forest, despite the trees." Anyway, thanks for your efforts--keep up the good work, and Christ's peace be with you.

---

Date: Fri Aug 03 20:19:39 2012
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

Fr. Airmariaman:

It’s not your fault; the mainstream news media here is almost purely Leftist and anti-American; they only print or broadcast openly whatever supports their viewpoint and they slant or do not report news such as this. See the Liars of Journalism page and the articles linked in the right hand column of that page. I first became aware of the Marxist political slant with the reporting on Cuba when Castro took over; it has gotten much worse since then. The “official” news you hear from America is false.

Here we depend on talk radio, which has become dominated by conservative Constitutionalists, the internet, and each other. The so-called Tea Party is in reality an awakening to the growing insidious threat that has been sneaking into our very national intellect since, at least, Theodore Roosevelt.

I know how you feel, Father. It isn’t easy for me to pay proper attention to the Lord with all these threats growing around us. I really love my religion, but I seem to be spending all my time lately, on this site, on the political side of the street. I just give thanks to God that there are men and women dedicated full time to the Lord to make up for what the rest of us lack in proper prayer.

Some of us fight; some of us pray; and then there are the odd weirdo’s like me who try to do both, and do neither to the best of ability.

Warmest Regards,

Vic

---

Date: Sun Aug 05 04:18:59 2012
From: Jenny
Email:
Location:
Comment:

Vic,

While you might be right in addressing the two big scandals as possible acts against the constitution, and I said might, much of the rest of this is just political opinion. You are condemning the whole Democratic Party as somehow anti-American and somehow treasonable. Do you see no need for any safety net for the unfortunate? All the opposition to your point of view is not anti-American; much of it is charitably seeking to improve the lives of the less fortunate. Your point is well made, but you go too far. Do you not see this?

---

Date: Sun Aug 05 07:38:57 2012
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

Jenny:

What can I say? Truth is not negotiable. Read the Constitution. There is nothing in there about charity or any safety net. The unfortunates turn first to family, then to Church, then to charitable organizations, then to the lowest levels of government, then to the next highest. Not to the federal government. That is not what the federal government is constituted to do. This is a truth that cannot be compromised; but, as we see, it has been compromised unto the possible death of us as a nation.

I cannot help it if you and me and many have been educated otherwise, in a federally driven education system that is corrupted by Marxist ideologies and that has no constitutional legitimacy in the first place. I cannot help it if you and me and many have been studiously propagandized by a SLIMC¹ that is dominated by anti-American Marxist ideology.

All of these programs oppose the constitutional right to private property, and to not be deprived of it without due process of law. The political “point of view” that you speak of opposes all options of the “unfortunate” save one: the federal government. It opposes the family, it opposes the Church, it opposes private charities, it even opposes lower levels of government as opponents in a “turf war” over government authority and power. It seeks to be the answer to every social problem, and the only source of support for all of us.

Truth cannot be compromised.

We are now looking at the results of that vitally important principle not being widely recognized by the citizenry. Our government is out of control.

Regards,

Vic

---

Date: Tue Aug 07 19:51:56 2012
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

The plot thickens …

It turns out that no one in the class of ’83 at Columbia ever knew, saw or ever heard of Comrade Obama, peace be upon him. And his records are sealed, at our expense. A classmate who never heard of him while attending as a pre-law political science major in the same class in which Obama was a pre-law political science major has a pretty good theory of how our man-child President might have gotten into Ivey-league schools after smoking dope and snorting coke, in a daze, all through high school.

He went to grade school in Indonesia during a time when only Indonesian citizens could go to public schools, which means, he or his father got him an Indonesian citizenship, which would require renouncing his American citizenship, if indeed he had one. After high school in America, he somehow got into Occidental, and then was able to transfer from there to Columbia on a student visa, which means that he was a foreigner.

But, you see, his passport record is sealed, at our expense, so we the voters can never look at his travel record, or where he’s from, or what his citizenship is or ever has been. And his educational records are sealed, so we the voters can never look at any application addresses, citizenship statuses, grades, transcripts or anything else – again, at our expense.

If this guy is right – and he seems to be a lot more straightforward and forthcoming than Comrade Obama, peace be upon him – then our current President is not legally qualified to vote in an American election, let alone run for any office, because he is almost certainly an illegal alien. No wonder he seems to have such an affinity to criminals as well as Marxists and Moslems.

I would like to know when and how he established, or re-established, his American citizenship, and if he did it legally, or in one or the other of the illegal ways so many criminal aliens use today, with the help of La Raza, ACORN, the Democrat Party and other criminal enterprises.

The details are on Talk Radio, Drudge and The Blaze, but not reported anywhere by the SLIMC¹ .

So what else is new?

Regards,

Vic

---

Note:

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

As part of the ongoing effort to upgrade this whole website, upgraded this webpage to the new BB 2.0 - SBI! 3.0 release and to make use of the new reusable code features.
An earlier phase of this major conversion corrupted or adversely affected some fonts, alignments, quotes and tables in the previously published webpages. Not to worry; this phase is converting them all, one by one. Eventually, every webpage on this site will have the same look and feel as this one.
LOVE this new release!

Regards,

Vic

---

Date:  Fri Mar 08 14:17:19 2013
From:  Curmudgeon
Email:   
Location:  
Comment: 

Vic,

Have you been following the un-warranted inside-the-US drone snooping on, and potential drone murdering of, uncharged American citizens, and Rand Paul's big filibuster?  I'm wondering what sort of drones might be involved.  It took so long and so much effort to get an open answer out of Attorney General Eric Holder that I wonder if the answer was honest.

Curmudgeon

---

Date:  Fri Mar 08 20:05:37 2013
From:  Vic Biorseth
Comment:  

Curmudgeon:

The only thing that surprises me about this is how many people are surprised by it.  Obama is a Marxist, and everyone who surrounds him is a Marxist.  There has never been a Marxist dictator who did not use murder, particularly political assasination, for his own purposes.  That's what Marxists do.  All you have to do is look at him and at those closest to him. 

His first personally selected Secretary of State was the Marxist-redistributionist, Madam "It Takes A Village" Hillary Clinton, who wrote her college thesis on Saul Alinsky, the Marxist-anarchist who wrote about how to politically infiltrate and destroy America using treachery from within. 

His second personally selected Secretary of State was the filthy traitor John "I served in Vietnam" Kerry, who illegally led his Communist organization Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW) in their "negotiations" with the Viet-Cong (Vietnamese Communist Party) in Paris in 1971, while the war against them was still going on, and who voted in the VVAW meeting in which they voted on whether or not to begin assassinating United States Senators yet, or to wait. 

Why would anyone with common sense be surprised if Obama began knocking off all of his political opposition, using any means whatsoever? 

It is almost certain that he, and Madam Hillary, both, were involved up to their necks in setting up the ambush that killed the Ambassador in Benghazi, spoken about in the article and the comments afterward in the The End Game page.  He was set up.  There was no other reason for him to be there at that time.  They set him up.  This was the closing event in their project using this ambassador to run guns through Turkey to Syria and elsewhere in the Middle East.  Just as soon as the Turkish representative left the compound and was safely away, the prepared attack commenced.  It was a setup. 

Of course, none of this was reported, nor will it be reported, in the thoroughly Marxist SLIMC¹ . Why would it be?

Rush, Glenn and Sean think this might be a major "revelation" stirring up the moron vote; I doubt it.  We, the choir, are the only ones paying attention.  The "dependent" part of the moron vote will vote Democrat no matter what; at least most of them will.  There is a major fraction, perhaps a majority, of the moron vote that is simply convinced of the correctness of the Democrat position(s) and are absolutely committed to blind hatred of the rest of us.  Then, of course, there are the true morons, who still don't know, and never will know, what's going on.  They're watching the Kardashians, or dancing with the stars, or American Idol. 

There is a thundering herd of moron voters out there who never listen to talk radio, never watch Fox, and only go to Leftist internet sites, or porn. 

Sorry, but I'm still not optimistic. 

Regards,

Vic

---

Date:  Wed Aug 28 08:58:03 2013
From:  Alexius
Email:   
Location:  
Comment: 

Vic,

In our exchange yesterday on your Refuting Mohammed page you said the following:

"It was Obama's and Hillary's secret gun running operation from Libya through Turkey to the revolutionaries in Syria that brought about the civil war going on in Syria right now, just as it brought about the death of the US ambassador at Benghazi.  The goal was and is destabilization, chaos and disorder."

An internet search to find this gun running operation produced nothing but conjecture here and there with no evidence, with the comments on this page among them.  Do you have any evidence to support what you said here? 

It now looks like Al-Queda is the "revolutionary" faction in Syria.  Are you saying the supposed gun running operation was running guns to Al-Queda in Syria? 

---

Date:  Wed Aug 28 20:44:42 2013
From:  Vic Biorseth
Comment:  

Alexius:

That's certainly what it looks like now.  See the Benghazi page.  It looks like a secret plan cooked up between the US government and Al Queda in Libya, to run guns through someone - Turkish government?  Moslem Brothrhood? Al Queda in Turkey? - through Turkey, to Al Queda in Syria. 

Comrade Obama and Madam Hillary, or their surrogates, were secretly dealing with America's most deadly sworn enemies. 

Nothing else makes sense.  The apparent goal was to feed more North African and Middle Eastern destabilization, chaos and war, perhaps even leading to global war. 

Regards,

Vic

---

Date:   Tue Aug 26 2014
From:  Vic Biorseth
Comment:  

Changes pursuant to changing the website URL and name from 
Thinking Catholic Strategic Center to
Catholic American Thinker.

Pulled the trigger on the 301 MOVE IT option June 1, 2014. Working my way through all the webpages.  . 

Regards,

Vic

---

This Form cannot be submitted until the missing fields (labelled below in red) have been filled in

ADD COMMENT

Please note that all fields followed by an asterisk must be filled in.

Name / Pseudo-Name:*

E-mail Address:

City / State / Country:

Comment:*

Please enter the word that you see below.

Copyrighted Material